Skip to content

GHSA-gqvf-892r-vjm5 CVE-2020-7942

Improper Certificate Validation in Puppet

Medium RubyGems
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.80%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 56.62% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Fix
6.13.0
Upgrade puppet to this version or later

Description

Previously, Puppet operated on the model that a node with a valid certificate was entitled to all information in the system and that a compromised certificate allowed access to everything in the infrastructure. When a node's catalog falls back to the default node, the catalog can be retrieved for a different node by modifying facts for the Puppet run. This issue can be mitigated by setting strict_hostname_checking = true in puppet.conf on your Puppet master. Puppet 6.13.0 changes the default behavior for strict_hostname_checking from false to true. It is recommended that Puppet Open Source and Puppet Enterprise users that are not upgrading still set strict_hostname_checking to true to ensure secure behavior.

Affected versions

RubyGems

PackageVulnerableFixed in
puppet
>= 6.0.0, < 6.13.0
6.13.0
puppet
< 5.5.19
5.5.19

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

puppet RubyGems → 6.13.0

bundler
bundle update puppet # Gemfile: gem "puppet", ">= 6.13.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
  • Implementation: If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-mpmx-gm5v-q789
Puppet uses predictable filenames, allowing arbitrary file overwrite
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-9pvx-fwwh-w289
Puppet does not properly restrict access to node resources
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-qh3g-27jf-3j54
Puppet allows local users to modify the permissions of arbitrary files
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-8c56-v25w-f89c
Puppet arbitrary file overwrite
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-v58w-6xc2-w799
Puppet Denial of Service and Arbitrary File Write
Low Also affects puppet
GHSA-c4mc-49hq-q275
Puppet uses predictable filenames, allowing arbitrary file overwrite
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-6xxq-j39w-g3f6
Puppet Arbitrary Command Execution
Medium Also affects puppet
GHSA-77hg-g8cc-5r37
Puppet Privilege Escallation
Medium Also affects puppet
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor