Skip to content

GHSA-f3pg-qwvg-p99c CVE-2021-32715 RUSTSEC-2021-0078

Lenient Parsing of Content-Length Header When Prefixed with Plus Sign

Low crates.io
Severity
3.1 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.13%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 66.31% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Fix
0.14.10
Upgrade hyper to this version or later

Description

Summary

hyper's HTTP/1 server code had a flaw that incorrectly parses and accepts requests with a Content-Length header with a prefixed plus sign, when it should have been rejected as illegal. This combined with an upstream HTTP proxy that doesn't parse such Content-Length headers, but forwards them, can result in "request smuggling" or "desync attacks".

Vulnerability

The flaw exists in all prior versions of hyper, if built with rustc v1.5.0 or newer.

Example:

GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Content-Length: +3

abc

This request gets accepted and hyper reads the body as abc. The request should be rejected, according to RFC 7230, since the ABNF for Content-Length only allows for DIGITs. This is due to using the FromStr implementation for u64 in the standard library. By differing from the spec, it is possible to send requests like these to endpoints that have different HTTP implementations, with different interpretations of the payload semantics, and cause "desync attacks".

In this particular case, an upstream proxy would need to error when parsing the Content-Length, but not reject the request (swallowing its own error), and forwarding the request as-is with the Content-Length still included. Then the upstream proxy and hyper would disagree on the length of the request body. The combination of these factors would be extremely rare.

Read more about desync attacks: https://portswigger.net/research/http-desync-attacks-request-smuggling-reborn

Impact

To determine if vulnerable, all these things must be true:

  • Using hyper as an HTTP server. While the lenient decoder also exists in the client, a vulnerability does not exist around responses.
  • Using HTTP/1. The HTTP/2 code uses a stricter parser.
  • Using a vulnerable HTTP proxy upstream to hyper. If an upstream proxy correctly rejects the illegal Content-Length header, OR can parse the length with the plus sign, the desync attack cannot succeed.

Patches

We have released the following patch versions:

  • v0.14.10 (to be released when this advisor is published)

Workarounds

Besides upgrading hyper, you can take the following options:

  • Reject requests manually that contain a plus sign prefix in the Content-Length header.
  • Ensure any upstream proxy handles Content-Length headers with a plus sign prefix.

Credits

This issue was initially reported by Mattias Grenfeldt and Asta Olofsson.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
hyper
< 0.14.10
0.14.10
hyper
>= 0.0.0-0, < 0.14.10
0.14.10

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

hyper crates.io → 0.14.10

cargo
cargo update -p hyper --precise 0.14.10

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 3.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache [REF-433].
  • Implementation: Use only SSL communication.
  • Implementation: Terminate the client session after each request.
  • System Configuration: Turn all pages to non-cacheable.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-f67m-9j94-qv9j
Parser creates invalid uninitialized value
High Also affects hyper
GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9
Integer Overflow in Chunked Transfer-Encoding
Medium Also affects hyper
GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf
HTTP Request Smuggling in hyper
Medium Also affects hyper
GHSA-h3qr-rq2j-74w4
HTTP Request Smuggling in hyper
Critical Also affects hyper
GHSA-q89x-f52w-6hj2
Headers containing newline characters can split messages in hyper
Medium Also affects hyper
GHSA-9xjr-m6f3-v5wm
HTTPS MitM vulnerability due to lack of hostname verification
Medium Also affects hyper
EEF-CVE-2026-114216
Chunk extensions accept bare LF and CR, enabling request smuggling in Bandit
Not rated yet Same weakness, CWE-444
RUSTSEC-2026-0388
Pingora HTTP/2 :authority and Host header mismatch enables cache poisoning and host-based access control bypass
Not rated yet Same weakness, CWE-444
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor