Skip to content

RUSTSEC-2026-0388 CVE-2026-105298 GHSA-mgg9-6xw2-jfgp

Pingora HTTP/2 :authority and Host header mismatch enables cache poisoning and host-based access control bypass

Not rated yet crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
Unknown · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.56%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 46.51% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Fix
0.9.0
Upgrade pingora-core to this version or later

Description

Pingora versions prior to 0.9.0 accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and logs that read the request URI (session.req_header().uri) saw the :authority value, but the upstream received the client-supplied Host value. Pingora also accepted :authority values containing userinfo (for example, user@example.com). This violates RFC 9113 Section 8.3.1, which requires an intermediary to use the :authority value for Host and replace any existing Host field.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a single HTTP/2 request that the application sees as one host and the upstream receives as another. Where request filters, access controls, or cache keys use the URI authority and the upstream routes by Host, this can lead to cache poisoning, where a response from another virtual host is stored under the victim host's cache key and served to other users, or host-based access control bypass, where a request approved for one host is served by a different virtual host on the upstream. Deployments that do not accept HTTP/2 from clients, or that do not use the request authority for security or caching decisions, are not affected.

This flaw was corrected in commits 915590a91811877795531f6ba0927a3138b5cb4b and ffab8302d08d4292d1924eb8fe84647fd5cb8e76. Pingora now returns 400 Bad Request for HTTP/2 requests whose Host differs from :authority, that contain more than one Host, or whose authority contains userinfo, and keeps the upstream Host or :authority consistent with the request authority. Users should upgrade to Pingora >= 0.9.0.

Note: Cloudflare CDN customers were unaffected, as internal Pingora services at Cloudflare do not have HTTP/2 clients.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pingora-core
>= 0.0.0-0, < 0.9.0
0.9.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pingora-core crates.io → 0.9.0

cargo
cargo update -p pingora-core --precise 0.9.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
Low
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache [REF-433].
  • Implementation: Use only SSL communication.
  • Implementation: Terminate the client session after each request.
  • System Configuration: Turn all pages to non-cacheable.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
RUSTSEC-2026-0389
Pingora HTTP/2 server memory exhaustion through unbounded default header-list and concurrent-stream limits
High Also affects pingora-core
GHSA-xq2h-p299-vjwv
Pingora vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling via Premature Upgrade
Critical Also affects pingora-core
GHSA-hj7x-879w-vrp7
Pingora has HTTP Request Smuggling via HTTP/1.0 and Transfer-Encoding Misparsing
Critical Also affects pingora-core
GHSA-393w-9x6h-8gc7
Pingora update for MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability
High Also affects pingora-core
RUSTSEC-2025-0070
Pingora MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability
High Also affects pingora-core
GHSA-93c7-7xqw-w357
Pingora has a Request Smuggling Vulnerability
Medium Also affects pingora-core
EEF-CVE-2026-114216
Chunk extensions accept bare LF and CR, enabling request smuggling in Bandit
Not rated yet Same weakness, CWE-444
GHSA-pqxq-w44r-73xw
AIOHTTP: Pure-Python parser request smuggling
Medium Same weakness, CWE-444
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor