Skip to content

GHSA-wc7j-g8wx-m2qx CVE-2026-45260

Pimcore: Missing Authorization in WebDAV MOVE via unchecked asset move handling

High Packagist
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.64%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 50.50% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
12.3.7
Upgrade pimcore/pimcore to this version or later

Description

Summary

Pimcore's WebDAV asset endpoint exposes a MOVE operation through /asset/webdav{path} without adding an authentication plugin in the WebDAV controller. The Tree::move() implementation then performs asset mutation and deletion before checking a current Pimcore user or any asset permissions.

An unauthenticated remote attacker who knows two existing asset paths in the same directory can send a WebDAV MOVE request that deletes the source asset. Authenticated low-privileged users may also be able to perform unauthorized asset move or overwrite operations because the move path does not enforce rename, delete, create, or publish permissions.

Details

The route for WebDAV is globally registered and accepts arbitrary trailing paths:

# bundles/CoreBundle/config/routing.yaml
pimcore_webdav:
    path: /asset/webdav{path}
    defaults: { _controller: Pimcore\Bundle\CoreBundle\Controller\WebDavController::webdavAction }
    requirements:
        path: '.*'

The controller constructs a SabreDAV server but only attaches lock and browser plugins. It does not attach an authentication plugin or perform an explicit user/session check before starting the server:

# bundles/CoreBundle/src/Controller/WebDavController.php
$publicDir = new Asset\WebDAV\Folder($homeDir);
$objectTree = new Asset\WebDAV\Tree($publicDir);
$server = new \Sabre\DAV\Server($objectTree);
$server->setBaseUri($this->generateUrl('pimcore_webdav', ['path' => '/']));
$server->addPlugin($lockPlugin);
$server->addPlugin(new \Sabre\DAV\Browser\Plugin());
$server->start();

Most WebDAV file and folder operations perform permission checks through isAllowed(), but Tree::move() does not. In the overwrite path for a same-directory move, it deletes the source asset before resolving the current user:

# models/Asset/WebDAV/Tree.php
if (dirname($sourcePath) == dirname($destinationPath)) {
    if ($asset = Asset::getByPath('/' . $destinationPath)) {
        $sourceAsset = Asset::getByPath('/' . $sourcePath);
        $asset->setData($sourceAsset->getData());
        $sourceAsset->delete();
    }
    ...
}

$user = \Pimcore\Tool\Admin::getCurrentUser();
$asset->setUserModification($user->getId());
$asset->save();

Asset::delete() removes the asset without an internal permission gate:

# models/Asset.php
public function delete(bool $isNested = false): void
{
    ...
    $this->getDao()->delete();
    ...
    $this->deletePhysicalFile();
}

Because the source asset deletion happens before $user->getId(), an unauthenticated request can still cause a deletion even if later execution fails when no current user is present.

PoC

Prerequisites:

  • Pimcore 2026.1.0 with the built-in WebDAV route enabled.
  • Two existing asset paths in the same directory, for example /products/source.jpg and /products/existing.jpg.
  • No valid session is required for the unauthenticated deletion path.

PoC request:

MOVE /asset/webdav/products/source.jpg HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Destination: http://target.example/asset/webdav/products/existing.jpg
Overwrite: T

Result:

The server will return an error after the deletion because Tree::move() later attempts to call $user->getId() when no current user exists. However, the source asset at /products/source.jpg has already been deleted by $sourceAsset->delete() before that failure point.

For an authenticated low-privileged backend user without sufficient asset permissions, the same request can also reach the unchecked move path and may overwrite the destination asset or move an asset without the expected per-asset permission checks.

Impact

This issue allows remote unauthorized destruction of assets when paths are known or guessable. In Pimcore deployments where assets represent product images, documents, media, or DAM-managed business content, deletion or unauthorized overwrite can cause data loss, content integrity loss, and service disruption.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pimcore/pimcore
>= 12.0.0-RC1, < 12.3.7
12.3.7
pimcore/pimcore
>= 2026.1.0, < 2026.1.3
2026.1.3
pimcore/pimcore
< 11.5.17
11.5.17

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pimcore/pimcore Packagist → 12.3.7

composer
composer require pimcore/pimcore:^12.3.7

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-23rh-xw42-fq82
Pimcore: SQL Injection in Custom Reports via Malicious Report Configuration
High Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-9x44-4gxf-8c25
Pimcore Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via DataObject Class-Definition Field Name
Critical Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-w23p-wrp7-ch38
Pimcore Hotspotimage getDataFromResource() unrestricted Serialize::unserialize over object-store column (PHP Object Injection, CWE-502)
Critical Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-2mhj-fhvg-v428
Pimcore: ClassDefinition UID regex missing end anchor allows SQL injection via Block.php unquoted table name
High Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-7p36-fq2r-4h7r
Pimcore CMS Twig Sandbox Bypass via SecurityPolicy checkMethodAllowed
High Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-jwcc-gv4m-93x6
Pimcore has a CustomReports Share Bypass
High Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-332x-r494-54fq
Pimcore has a WordExport Authorization Bypass for Unauthorized Document Export
Medium Also affects pimcore/pimcore
GHSA-36fc-7wjg-mfvj
Pimcore has Unsafe PHP Deserialization in Multiple Locations Without allowed_classes Restriction
High Also affects pimcore/pimcore
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor