GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq CVE-2026-45617
LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.46%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.75% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
- Fix
10.26.0- Upgrade liquidjs to this version or later
Description
Summary
The built-in strip_html filter in liquidjs uses a regex containing four lazy-quantified alternatives. When the input contains many <script, <style, or <!-- opener tokens without matching closers, the V8 regex engine performs O(N²) backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop. A single ~350 KB request ('<script'.repeat(50000)) stalls the process for ~10 seconds; cost grows quadratically with input size. The default memoryLimit: Infinity does not bound regex CPU, and even when configured strip_html only charges str.length to the limit — the regex itself runs unbounded.
Details
The vulnerable filter is at src/filters/html.ts:45-49:
export function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {
const str = stringify(v)
this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)
return str.replace(/<script[\s\S]*?<\/script>|<style[\s\S]*?<\/style>|<.*?>|<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '')
}
The regex contains four lazy patterns:
<script[\s\S]*?<\/script><style[\s\S]*?<\/style><.*?><!--[\s\S]*?-->
For an input like '<script'.repeat(N), the engine encounters N starting < positions. At each one it must lazily expand [\s\S]*? (and .*?) all the way to end-of-input searching for a closer that never appears, then fail and backtrack. Because each of the O(N) starts performs O(N) lazy-expansion work, total work is O(N²).
Reachability:
strip_htmlis a default-registered filter (exported fromsrc/filters/html.ts, wired up viasrc/filters/index.ts), invocable from any template via{{ x | strip_html }}.- The filter calls
String.prototype.replacewith the vulnerable regex directly on the caller-supplied string, with no length cap and no timeout. - The default
memoryLimitisInfinity(src/liquid-options.ts:198); the filter only chargesstr.lengthagainst memory (line 47), which does not bound CPU work for regex backtracking.
This is distinct from GHSA-45rm-2893-5f49 (prototype property leak, CWE-200) and from any prior replace/strip_html issues — the mechanism here is regex backtracking CPU consumption on a different filter.
PoC
Empirical scaling confirmed against a freshly built liquidjs@10.25.7 bundle on Node 22 / Linux:
node -e "
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');
const e = new Liquid();
(async () => {
for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) {
const payload = '<script'.repeat(n);
const t0 = Date.now();
await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });
console.log('n=' + n + ' inputLen=' + payload.length + ' ms=' + (Date.now() - t0));
}
})();
"
Verified output:
n=1000 inputLen=7000 ms=5
n=2000 inputLen=14000 ms=12 (2.4x for 2x size)
n=4000 inputLen=28000 ms=46 (3.8x for 2x size)
n=8000 inputLen=56000 ms=187 (4.0x for 2x size)
n=16000 inputLen=112000 ms=737 (3.9x for 2x size)
A larger payload extrapolates straightforwardly:
node -e "
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');
const e = new Liquid();
(async () => {
const payload = '<script'.repeat(50000); // 350 KB
const t0 = Date.now();
await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });
console.log('elapsed ms:', Date.now() - t0);
})();
"
# elapsed ms: ~10000+ (Node single-threaded event loop fully blocked)
The same pathology applies to <style and <!-- openers.
Impact
- Single-request DoS: A 350 KB request body stalls the Node.js event loop for ~10 seconds; 700 KB takes ~40 s; 1.4 MB takes ~160 s. All other requests on the process queue behind the regex.
- Trivial amplification: Quadratic scaling means small attacker bandwidth produces large server CPU consumption. A handful of concurrent requests fully saturates the worker.
- No authentication required: The typical use case for
strip_htmlis sanitizing untrusted input (comments, posts, profile bios, product descriptions). Any endpoint that renders user content throughstrip_htmlis exposed. - memoryLimit doesn't help: Even applications that opt into
memoryLimitare not protected, because (a) the regex CPU runs to completion before any output is produced, and (b) onlystr.lengthis charged, not the cost of the regex traversal.
Recommended Fix
Replace the backtracking regex with an atomic / non-overlapping pattern, and/or perform a single linear pass.
Option 1 — anchor each alternative so lazy expansion fails fast on chunked content (no [\s\S]*? over the full tail):
return str.replace(
/<script\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\/script>)[^<]*)*<\/script>|<style\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\/style>)[^<]*)*<\/style>|<!--[^-]*(?:-(?!->)[^-]*)*-->|<[^>]*>/g,
''
)
This unrolls each lazy quantifier so each < is visited at most a constant number of times overall — linear total work.
Option 2 — single-pass tokenizer in plain code; iterate over the string once, tracking whether you are inside <script>, <style>, comment, or generic tag, and emit nothing for those ranges.
Either fix should be combined with charging the regex output cost honestly to memoryLimit and (defensively) capping input length up front:
export function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {
const str = stringify(v)
this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)
// ... linear-time strip implementation here
}
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| liquidjs | < 10.26.0 |
10.26.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
liquidjs npm → 10.26.0
- npm
npm install liquidjs@10.26.0- yarn
yarn add liquidjs@10.26.0- pnpm
pnpm add liquidjs@10.26.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
- System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
- Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
- Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration | Medium | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-4r6h-5v86-94p3 LiquidJS: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in `join` filter allows template authors to bypass `memoryLimit` and crash the process | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-m7fp-h3p4-hr49 LiquidJS has an infinite loop vulnerability in its `strip_html` filter | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-g357-x5c3-c72p LiquidJS: `pop` filter bypasses `memoryLimit` accounting that its array-filter siblings enforce | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-gf2q-c269-pqgc LiquidJS is Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution | Critical | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q LiquidJS has a memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width padding in `date` filter (strftime) | High | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-9x9p-qf8f-mvjg LiquidJS's `{% render %}` tag silently bypasses per-render `ownPropertyOnly:true` via `Context.spawn()` | Medium | Also affects liquidjs |
| GHSA-8xx9-69p8-7jp3 LiquidJS has a renderLimit DoS guard bypass via empty `{% for %}` body | Medium | Also affects liquidjs |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor