GHSA-vrr2-g9gh-c3jc CVE-2026-52820
Kimai: Timesheet PATCH/POST allows assigning to project outside user's team via query_builder OR-bypass
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.45%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.03% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
- Fix
2.57.0- Upgrade kimai/kimai to this version or later
Description
Summary
The Timesheet API PATCH /api/timesheets/{id} and POST /api/timesheets endpoints accept a user-supplied project ID and resolve it through a Symfony EntityType whose query_builder allows the submitted ID to satisfy the access predicate via an unconditional OR branch. As a result, any authenticated user can re-assign their own timesheet to any project in the database — including projects that belong to teams or customers they have no membership in and cannot otherwise see. The user can then read serialized project/customer details via GET /api/timesheets/{id}?full=true, leaking metadata (name, currency, customer hierarchy) that would otherwise be filtered out by the team ACL.
Details
Entry point — only ownership is checked in src/API/TimesheetController.php:317-355
#[IsGranted('edit', 'timesheet')]
#[Route(methods: ['PATCH'], path: '/{id}', name: 'patch_timesheet', requirements: ['id' => '\d+'])]
public function patchAction(Request $request, Timesheet $timesheet): Response
{
...
$form = $this->createForm(TimesheetApiEditForm::class, $timesheet, [...]);
$form->setData($timesheet);
$form->submit($request->request->all(), false);
if (false === $form->isValid()) { ... }
$this->service->saveTimesheet($timesheet);
...
}
src/Voter/TimesheetVoter.php:134-142:
if ($subject->getUser()?->getId() === $user->getId()) {
return $this->permissionManager->hasRolePermission($user, $permission . '_own_timesheet');
}
if (!$this->permissionManager->checkTeamAccessTimesheet($subject, $user)) {
return false;
}
For an own-timesheet, only edit_own_timesheet is required. The voter does not look at the new project being submitted; it only validates the existing record's ownership.
Form replays user-controlled project ID into the access query
src/Form/TimesheetEditForm.php:60-71:
$isNew = true;
if (isset($options['data']) && $options['data'] instanceof Timesheet) {
...
if (null !== $entry->getId()) {
$isNew = false;
}
...
}
$this->addProject($builder, $isNew, $project, $customer);
src/Form/FormTrait.php:59-100:
$builder->addEventListener(
FormEvents::PRE_SUBMIT,
function (FormEvent $event) use ($builder, $project, $customer, $isNew, $options): void {
$data = $event->getData();
$customer = \array_key_exists('customer', $data) && $data['customer'] !== '' ? $data['customer'] : null;
$project = \array_key_exists('project', $data) && $data['project'] !== '' ? $data['project'] : $project;
$event->getForm()->add('project', ProjectType::class, array_merge($options, [
'group_by' => null,
'query_builder' => function (ProjectRepository $repo) use ($builder, $project, $customer, $isNew) {
$project = \is_string($project) ? (int) $project : $project;
...
if ($isNew && \is_int($project)) {
$project = $repo->find($project);
if ($project !== null) {
if (!$project->getCustomer()->isVisible()) { ... $project = null; }
elseif (!$project->isVisible()) { $project = null; }
}
}
...
$query = new ProjectFormTypeQuery($project, $customer);
$query->setUser($builder->getOption('user'));
$query->setWithCustomer(true);
return $repo->getQueryBuilderForFormType($query);
},
]));
}
);
Two problems compound:
- The visibility re-check on line 73 is gated on
$isNew. For PATCH,$isNew = false, so the closure passes the attacker-supplied ID straight through. - Even when
$isNew = true(POST), the re-check only validatesisVisible()— it does not validate team membership.
The query-builder unconditionally accepts the submitted ID
src/Repository/ProjectRepository.php:150-208:
public function getQueryBuilderForFormType(ProjectFormTypeQuery $query): QueryBuilder
{
...
$mainQuery = $qb->expr()->andX();
$mainQuery->add($qb->expr()->eq('p.visible', ':visible'));
$mainQuery->add($qb->expr()->eq('c.visible', ':customer_visible'));
if (!$query->isIgnoreDate()) { ... }
if ($query->hasCustomers()) { ... }
$permissions = $this->getPermissionCriteria($qb, $query->getUser(), $query->getTeams());
if ($permissions->count() > 0) {
$mainQuery->add($permissions);
}
$outerQuery = $qb->expr()->orX();
if ($query->hasProjects()) {
$outerQuery->add($qb->expr()->in('p.id', ':project')); // <-- unconditional
$qb->setParameter('project', $query->getProjects());
}
...
$outerQuery->add($mainQuery);
$qb->andWhere($outerQuery);
return $qb;
}
The final WHERE clause is roughly:
WHERE (p.id IN (:project)) OR (p.visible AND c.visible AND <date> AND <team-ACL>)
Because :project is the submitted ID itself, the first branch matches unconditionally, completely bypassing the team-ACL applied by getPermissionCriteria. Symfony's EntityType happily resolves the foreign Project entity, the form passes validation, and the timesheet is persisted with the new project_id.
No downstream validation closes the gap
TimesheetService::saveTimesheet→updateTimesheet(src/Timesheet/TimesheetService.php:154-177) is explicitly documented as not validating.TimesheetBasicValidatoronly validates begin/end and project/activity coherence.TimesheetDeactivatedValidator::validateActivityAndProject(src/Validator/Constraints/TimesheetDeactivatedValidator.php:36-42) returns early for non-running existing timesheets.- No validator anywhere in the timesheet pipeline checks that the project's team membership intersects the acting user's teams.
A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.
Impact
- Integrity: any authenticated user can attribute their own tracked time to any project ID in the database — including projects belonging to teams/customers they cannot see. This pollutes per-project budgets, billing exports and reports for other teams. There is no in-app warning that records belonging to outsiders have been added.
- Confidentiality: by reading the timesheet back via
?full=true, the attacker obtains serialized project and customer details (name, currency, start/end dates, customer hierarchy) which would normally be filtered by the team ACL. - Privilege model: the
edit_own_timesheetpermission is part of the default ROLE_USER, so the bypass is reachable by every regular user without any administrator action.
The blast radius is bounded by what an attacker can persist (their own timesheet rows) and what the ?full=true serializer exposes — there is no direct ability to modify other teams' existing data.
Solution
- The FormTrait was updated to only pass the project forward for new timesheets
- A new
TimesheetTeamAccessValidatorwas added, which checks ifprojectoractivitywere changed. If that is the case, the team access permission is checked first
Find out more at https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-vrr2-g9gh-c3jc
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| kimai/kimai | < 2.57.0 |
2.57.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
kimai/kimai Packagist → 2.57.0
- composer
composer require kimai/kimai:^2.57.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
- Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rw46-qg69-vg6h Kimai: ExportTemplate CRUD Missing Authorization Check Allows Unauthorized TEAMLEAD Access | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-v8hx-4vx8-wc96 Kimai: Pre-2FA KIMAI_SESSION cookie grants full authenticated REST API access, bypassing TOTP | High | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-2xgg-2x8h-8xw4 Kimai: Improper Authorization in Project, Customer, and Activity Rate Edit Endpoints Allows Cross-Scope Rate Manipulation | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-xv4r-4885-gwpg Kimai has Improper Authorization in Team Member and Team Activity Assignment APIs Which Allows Expansion of Team Scope Beyond Authorized Visibility | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-jr9p-4h4j-6c58 Kimai: Default APP_SECRET in Docker Image Enables Cookie Forgery and Account Takeover | Critical | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-r8vr-m544-qh4h Kimai: Login CSRF in the Timesheet Stop and Restart API Endpoints Allows Unauthorized State Changes | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh Improper Authorization in Kimai Timesheet Restart and Duplicate Allows New Timesheets After Project Access Revocation | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
| GHSA-3q6q-26vg-v97x Kimai: Improper Authorization Through Activity Creation with Preset Project Allows Creation Under Unauthorized Projects | Medium | Also affects kimai/kimai |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor