GHSA-vf6j-6739-78m8 CVE-2023-22648
Rancher's Azure AD permission changes are not reflected on active sessions
- Severity
- 8.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.45%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.43% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management
- CWE-271 Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors
- CWE-384 Session Fixation
- Fix
2.6.13- Upgrade github.com/rancher/rancher to this version or later
Description
A bug has been identified in which permission changes in Azure AD are not reflected to users while they are logged in the Rancher UI. This would cause the users to retain their previous permissions in Rancher, even if they change groups on Azure AD, for example, to a lower privileged group, or are removed from a group, thus retaining their access to Rancher instead of losing it.
Impact
This issue only affects Rancher instances with Azure AD integration enabled, regardless of the automatically refreshing settings which are enabled by default. The users that obtained a token (or kubeconfig) to access Rancher through the following sessions are affected by this issue:
- Users using the Rancher UI.
- Users using
kubectlbased on akubeconfigdownloaded through the Rancher UI. - Tokens created via the Rancher UI Create API Key feature.
Note that the permission caching is persisted even when the Rancher Manager pod is restarted. The only way for a user to get the new permissions is to logout and login again.
Patches
Patched versions include releases 2.6.13, 2.7.4 and later versions.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Reach out to the SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries.
- Open an issue in the Rancher repository.
- Verify with our support matrix and product support lifecycle.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/rancher/rancher | >= 2.6.7, < 2.6.13 |
2.6.13 |
| github.com/rancher/rancher | >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.4 |
2.7.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/rancher/rancher Go → 2.6.13
- go
go get github.com/rancher/rancher@v2.6.13 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
- Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
CWE-271: Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors
The product does not drop privileges before passing control of a resource to an actor that does not have those privileges.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
CWE-384: Session Fixation
Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Invalidate any existing session identifiers prior to authorizing a new user session.
- Architecture and Design: For platforms such as ASP that do not generate new values for sessionid cookies, utilize a secondary cookie. In this approach, set a secondary cookie on the user's browser to a random value and set a session variable to the same value. If the session variable and the cookie value ever don't match, invalidate the session, and force the user to log on again.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-4j6x-2764-m8gh Rancher has over-inclusive team membership expansion in GitHub App authentication provider | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-vx8h-4prv-g744 Rancher has Privilege Escalation from Project Owner to Host | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mhc6-2gfq-xx62 Rancher vulnerable to command injection through unsanitized YAML parameter | Critical | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-5v3h-x4wf-5c35 Rancher Extensions have arbitrary file access via path traversal | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-gqf8-rvrh-g7w6 Rancher cloud credentials can be used through proxy API by users without access | Critical | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-hwm2-4ph6-w6m5 Rancher's restricted PodSecurityPolicy does not prevent containers from running as a privileged user | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mc24-7m59-4q5p Rancher CLI skips TLS verification on Rancher CLI login command | Medium | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mw39-9qc2-f7mg Rancher exposes sensitive information through audit logs | Medium | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor