Skip to content

GHSA-v35c-49j6-q8hq CVE-2016-9879

Security Constraint Bypass in Spring Security

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 73.48% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
—
Not classified
Fix
3.2.10.RELEASE
Upgrade org.springframework.security:spring-security-core to this version or later

Description

Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification (see below). Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed.

Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath() and getPathInfo() [1].

Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified.

Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected.

Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25015

Affected Pivotal Products and Versions

Severity is high unless otherwise noted.

  • Spring Security 3.2.0 - 3.2.9
  • Spring Security 4.0.x - 4.1.3
  • Spring Security 4.2.0
  • Older unsupported versions are also affected

Mitigation

Adopting one of the following mitigations will protect against this vulnerability.

  • Use a Servlet container known not to include path parameters in the return values for getServletPath() and getPathInfo()
  • Upgrading to Spring Security 3.2.10, 4.1.4 or 4.2.1 will reject the request with a RequestRejectedException if the presence of an encoded "/" is detected. Note: If you wish to disable this feature it can be disabled by setting the DefaultHttpFirewall.allowUrlEncodedSlash = true. However, disabling this feature will mean applications are vulnerable (in containers that return path parameters in getServletPath() or getPathInfo()).

Credit

The issue was identified by Shumpei Asahara & Yuji Ito from NTT DATA Corporation and responsibly reported to Pivotal.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
< 3.2.10.RELEASE
3.2.10.RELEASE
org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
>= 4.0.0.RELEASE, < 4.1.4.RELEASE
4.1.4.RELEASE
org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
>= 4.2.0.RELEASE, < 4.2.1.RELEASE
4.2.1.RELEASE

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.springframework.security:spring-security-core Maven → 3.2.10.RELEASE

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId><artifactId>spring-security-core</artifactId><version>3.2.10.RELEASE</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.springframework.security:spring-security-core:3.2.10.RELEASE")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.0 7.5

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vxf7-qj7q-83fh
Spring Security Vulnerable to User Attribute Enumeration when Using DaoAuthenticationProvider
Low Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-x2wq-9x2f-fhj7
Spring Security Core has a TOCTOU race condition when One-Time Token login with JdbcOneTimeTokenService is configured
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-vqxh-445g-37fc
Spring Security has a broken timing attack mitigation implemented in DaoAuthenticationProvide
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-8v5q-rhf3-jphm
Spring Security annotation detection mechanism has authorization bypass
High Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-9pp5-9c7g-4r83
Spring Security authorization bypass for method security annotations on private methods
Critical Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-hh3m-g4qj-4835
Spring Security Vulnerable to Authorization Bypass via Security Annotations
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-q3v6-hm2v-pw99
Spring Framework has Authorization Bypass for Case Sensitive Comparisons
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-hmqf-wpq9-jq83
Spring Security Missing Authorization vulnerability
High Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor