Skip to content

GHSA-8v5q-rhf3-jphm CVE-2025-41248

Spring Security annotation detection mechanism has authorization bypass

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.45%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-289 Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
6.4.10
Upgrade org.springframework.security:spring-security-core to this version or later

Description

The Spring Security annotation detection mechanism may not correctly resolve annotations on methods within type hierarchies with a parameterized super type with unbounded generics. This can be an issue when using @PreAuthorize and other method security annotations, resulting in an authorization bypass.

Your application may be affected by this if you are using Spring Security's @EnableMethodSecurity feature.

You are not affected by this if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity or if you do not use security annotations on methods in generic superclasses or generic interfaces.

This CVE is published in conjunction with CVE-2025-41249 https://spring.io/security/cve-2025-41249 .

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.10
6.4.10
org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
>= 6.5.0, < 6.5.4
6.5.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.springframework.security:spring-security-core Maven → 6.4.10

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId><artifactId>spring-security-core</artifactId><version>6.4.10</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.springframework.security:spring-security-core:6.4.10")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-289: Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name

The product performs authentication based on the name of a resource being accessed, or the name of the actor performing the access, but it does not properly check all possible names for that resource or actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vxf7-qj7q-83fh
Spring Security Vulnerable to User Attribute Enumeration when Using DaoAuthenticationProvider
Low Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-x2wq-9x2f-fhj7
Spring Security Core has a TOCTOU race condition when One-Time Token login with JdbcOneTimeTokenService is configured
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-vqxh-445g-37fc
Spring Security has a broken timing attack mitigation implemented in DaoAuthenticationProvide
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-9pp5-9c7g-4r83
Spring Security authorization bypass for method security annotations on private methods
Critical Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-hh3m-g4qj-4835
Spring Security Vulnerable to Authorization Bypass via Security Annotations
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-q3v6-hm2v-pw99
Spring Framework has Authorization Bypass for Case Sensitive Comparisons
Medium Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-hmqf-wpq9-jq83
Spring Security Missing Authorization vulnerability
High Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
GHSA-f3jh-qvm4-mg39
Erroneous authentication pass in Spring Security
High Also affects org.springframework.security:spring-security-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor