GHSA-rw74-vc9h-534j CVE-2026-41663
Admidio has CSRF on Admin Preferences that Triggers Unauthorized Backup, .htaccess Write, and Email Send
- Severity
- 3.5 / 10
- Low · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.12%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 1.63% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Fix
5.0.9- Upgrade admidio/admidio to this version or later
Description
Summary
Several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page.
Details
In modules/preferences.php, the backup, test_email, and htaccess modes accept GET parameters with no CSRF token check:
// modules/preferences.php - backup mode
case 'backup':
// Creates full database dump and serves as download
// No CSRF token validation
$backupFile = $gDb->backup();
// ... sends file to client
break;
case 'test_email':
// Sends test email from the server
// No CSRF token validation
break;
case 'htaccess':
// Writes .htaccess file to disk
// No CSRF token validation
break;
The save mode in the same file validates CSRF via getFormObject(), confirming the developers intended CSRF protection but did not apply it to these other modes.
Because these are GET requests, SameSite=Lax browsers include session cookies on top-level cross-origin navigations, making CSRF exploitation trivial.
Proof of Concept
Simplified attacker page (csrf.html hosted on attacker origin):
<html>
<body>
<h1>Loading...</h1>
<!-- Trigger backup creation on victim's browser -->
<script>window.location = 'https://target-admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/preferences.php?mode=backup';</script>
</body>
</html>
When an administrator visits this page, the browser navigates to the Admidio backup URL with full session cookies. The server generates a database dump and serves it as a download to the victim's browser. Note: the backup downloads to the victim's machine, not to the attacker. The attacker cannot read the response cross-origin.
For htaccess mode, the CSRF overwrites the .htaccess file on the server, disrupting the application. For test_email mode, it triggers email sends from the server, which an attacker can abuse for spam or to probe internal email infrastructure.
Impact
An attacker tricks an Admidio administrator into visiting a malicious page that triggers state-changing operations on the server:
- Backup creation: forces the server to generate a full database dump. The backup downloads to the victim's browser, not to the attacker. However, repeated backup triggers can cause disk I/O and storage pressure on the server.
- htaccess modification: overwrites the server's
.htaccessfile, breaking URL routing or disabling security headers. - Test email: fires email sends from the server, usable as a spam relay or to probe internal mail configuration.
The core issue is that state-changing operations run via unprotected GET requests. The victim only needs to visit a single attacker-controlled page while logged in.
Recommended Fix
- Change
backup,test_email, andhtaccessoperations to require POST requests. - Add CSRF token validation using the existing
getFormObject()mechanism. - As defense in depth, set
SameSite=Stricton session cookies or add a confirmation step for destructive operations like database backup.
Found by aisafe.io
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| admidio/admidio | < 5.0.9 |
5.0.9 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
admidio/admidio Packagist → 5.0.9
- composer
composer require admidio/admidio:^5.0.9
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
- Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
- Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
- Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
- Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
- Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
- Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f Admidio: CSRF on Plugin Install, Uninstall, and Update via Unprotected GET Requests | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3 Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` — incomplete fix of #2024 | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mch8-wf3h-6x88 Admidio writes session IDs and auto-login cookie values to application logs | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-4rgq-38mh-9xqg Admidio PKCS#12 private key export action lacks CSRF protection | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-x628-457g-2pw9 Admidio has IDOR in `documents-files.php` `mode=move_save` that lets any folder-uploader exfiltrate files from private folders | High | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-q6w3-hpfv-rg36 Admidio: IDOR in documents-files.php allows cross-folder file rename and description changes by unauthorized uploaders | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-xg76-5qj2-2hhv Admidio: CSRF in SSO client `enable` action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mx25-j3rc-6w2w Admidio's CSRF in registration `send_login` mode resets arbitrary user passwords | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor