Skip to content

GHSA-qr3p-2xj2-q7hq BIT-solr-2026-22022 CVE-2026-22022

Apache Solr: Unauthorized bypass of certain "predefined permission" rules in the RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin

High Maven
Severity
8.2 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.58%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.69% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-285 Improper Authorization
Fix
9.10.1
Upgrade org.apache.solr:solr-core to this version or later

Description

Deployments of Apache Solr 5.3.0 through 9.10.0 that rely on Solr's "Rule Based Authorization Plugin" are vulnerable to allowing unauthorized access to certain Solr APIs, due to insufficiently strict input validation in those components.  Only deployments that meet all of the following criteria are impacted by this vulnerability:

  • Use of Solr's "RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin"
  • A RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin config (see security.json) that specifies multiple "roles"
  • A RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin permission list (see security.json) that uses one or more of the following pre-defined permission rules: "config-read", "config-edit", "schema-read", "metrics-read", or "security-read".
  • A RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin permission list that doesn't define the "all" pre-defined permission
  • A networking setup that allows clients to make unfiltered network requests to Solr. (i.e. user-submitted HTTP/HTTPS requests reach Solr as-is, unmodified or restricted by any intervening proxy or gateway)

Users can mitigate this vulnerability by ensuring that their RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin configuration specifies the "all" pre-defined permission and associates the permission with an "admin" or other privileged role.  Users can also upgrade to a Solr version outside of the impacted range, such as the recently released Solr 9.10.1.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.solr:solr-core
>= 5.3.0, < 9.10.1
9.10.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.solr:solr-core Maven → 9.10.1

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId><artifactId>solr-core</artifactId><version>9.10.1</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.solr:solr-core:9.10.1")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-285: Improper Authorization

The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
CVE-2019-17558
Improper Input Validation in Apache Solr
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
CVE-2019-0193
XML External Entity (XXE) Injection in Apache Solr
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-qhr7-h655-pw6r
Apache Solr has hardcoded credentials in the Basic Authentication setup tool
Critical Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-vc2w-4v3p-2mqw
Apache Solr: Insufficient file-access checking in standalone core-creation requests
High Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-68r2-fwcg-qpm8
Apache Solr vulnerable to Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Medium Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-4p5m-gvpf-f3x5
Apache Solr Relative Path Traversal vulnerability
Medium Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-37vr-vmg4-jwpw
Apache Solr: Backup/Restore APIs allow for deployment of executables in malicious ConfigSets
High Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
GHSA-4wxw-42wx-2wfx
Apache Solr Schema Designer blindly "trusts" all configsets
High Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor