GHSA-qhr7-h655-pw6r BIT-solr-2026-44825 CVE-2026-44825
Apache Solr has hardcoded credentials in the Basic Authentication setup tool
Critical
Maven
- Severity
- 8.1 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 3.92%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 90.34% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Hardcoded credentials in the Basic Authentication setup tool (bin/solr auth enable) in Apache Solr versions 9.4.0 through 9.10.1 and 10.0.0 allows a remote attacker to gain full administrative access to the cluster via publicly known default credentials installed silently alongside the user-specified account.
As an immediate workaround without upgrading, delete the template users (superadmin, admin, search, index) from security.json or change their passwords. The future, not yet released, versions 9.11.0 and 10.1.0 will not be vulnerable, and it will be enough to upgrade to solve the issue.
Not affected:
- Clusters where bin/solr auth enable was not used to bootstrap BasicAuth
- Clusters where template users have been assigned strong passwords after bootstrap
Affected versions
Maven
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| org.apache.solr:solr-core | >= 9.4.0, <= 9.10.1 |
No fix yet |
| org.apache.solr:solr-core | 1 listed versions | No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials
The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible [REF-7]. In Windows environments, the Encrypted File System (EFS) may provide some protection.
- Architecture and Design: For inbound authentication: Rather than hard-code a default username and password, key, or other authentication credentials for first time logins, utilize a "first login" mode that requires the user to enter a unique strong password or key.
- Architecture and Design: If the product must contain hard-coded credentials or they cannot be removed, perform access control checks and limit which entities can access the feature that requires the hard-coded credentials. For example, a feature might only be enabled through the system console instead of through a network connection.
- Architecture and Design: For inbound authentication using passwords: apply strong one-way hashes to passwords and store those hashes in a configuration file or database with appropriate access control. That way, theft of the file/database still requires the attacker to try to crack the password. When handling an incoming password during authentication, take the hash of the password and compare it to the saved hash. Use randomly assigned salts for each separate hash that is generated. This increases the amount of computation that an attacker needs to conduct a brute-force attack, possibly limiting the effectiveness of the rainbow table method.
- Architecture and Design: For front-end to back-end connections: Three solutions are possible, although none are complete. The first suggestion involves the use of generated passwords or keys that are changed automatically and must be entered at given time intervals by a system administrator. These passwords will be held in memory and only be valid for the time intervals. Next, the passwords or keys should be limited at the back end to only performing actions valid for the front end, as opposed to having full access. Finally, the messages sent should be tagged and checksummed with time sensitive values so as to prevent replay-style attacks.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-17558 Improper Input Validation in Apache Solr | High Known exploited | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| CVE-2019-0193 XML External Entity (XXE) Injection in Apache Solr | High Known exploited | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-vc2w-4v3p-2mqw Apache Solr: Insufficient file-access checking in standalone core-creation requests | High | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-qr3p-2xj2-q7hq Apache Solr: Unauthorized bypass of certain "predefined permission" rules in the RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin | High | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-68r2-fwcg-qpm8 Apache Solr vulnerable to Execution with Unnecessary Privileges | Medium | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-4p5m-gvpf-f3x5 Apache Solr Relative Path Traversal vulnerability | Medium | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-37vr-vmg4-jwpw Apache Solr: Backup/Restore APIs allow for deployment of executables in malicious ConfigSets | High | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
| GHSA-4wxw-42wx-2wfx Apache Solr Schema Designer blindly "trusts" all configsets | High | Also affects org.apache.solr:solr-core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor