Skip to content

GHSA-q6x5-8v7m-xcrf CVE-2026-44288

protobufjs has overlong UTF-8 decoding

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.84% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-176 Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

protobufjs includes a minimal UTF-8 decoder used in non-Node and fallback decoding paths. The affected decoder accepted overlong UTF-8 byte sequences and decoded them to their canonical characters instead of replacing them.

The issue concerns overlong encodings and code points outside the Unicode range. protobufjs may still accept some non-strict UTF-8 input for compatibility, so applications should not rely on protobufjs as a general-purpose strict UTF-8 validator.

Impact

An attacker who can provide protobuf binary data decoded through the affected UTF-8 path may be able to bypass application-level checks that inspect raw bytes before protobuf string decoding. For example, bytes that do not contain certain ASCII characters could decode to strings containing those characters.

The practical impact depends on downstream application validation and how decoded strings are used. Node.js Buffer-backed decoding paths are not directly affected when they use Node's native UTF-8 decoding.

Preconditions

  • The application must decode protobuf binary data influenced by an attacker.
  • The affected protobuf string field must be decoded through protobufjs's minimal UTF-8 decoder rather than a native UTF-8 decoder.
  • The application must rely on byte-level filtering or validation before protobuf string decoding.
  • The decoded string must then be used in a security-sensitive context.

Workarounds

Avoid relying only on byte-level filtering before protobuf string decoding with affected versions. Validate decoded strings at the point where they are used, and prefer runtime paths that use native UTF-8 decoding where necessary.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@protobufjs/utf8
< 1.1.1
1.1.1
protobufjs
< 7.5.6
7.5.6
protobufjs
>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2
8.0.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@protobufjs/utf8 npm → 1.1.1

npm
npm install @protobufjs/utf8@1.1.1
yarn
yarn add @protobufjs/utf8@1.1.1
pnpm
pnpm add @protobufjs/utf8@1.1.1

protobufjs npm → 7.5.6

npm
npm install protobufjs@7.5.6
yarn
yarn add protobufjs@7.5.6
pnpm
pnpm add protobufjs@7.5.6

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-176: Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding

The product does not properly handle when an input contains Unicode encoding.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j3f2-48v5-ccww
protobufjs: Denial of Service via infinite loop in .proto option parsing
High Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-jfj6-75fj-8934
protobufjs: Text Format string map parsing can mutate returned map object prototype
Medium Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-94rc-8x27-4472
protobufjs: Memory amplification from preserved unknown fields in binary decode
Medium Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-wcpc-wj8m-hjx6
protobufjs: Denial of service through unbounded Any expansion during JSON conversion
High Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-f38q-mgvj-vph7
protobufjs : Schema-derived names can shadow runtime-significant properties
Medium Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-jggg-4jg4-v7c6
protobufjs: Denial of Service via unbounded recursive JSON descriptor expansion
High Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-2pr8-phx7-x9h3
protobuf.js: Denial of service from crafted field names in generated code
Medium Also affects protobufjs
GHSA-66ff-xgx4-vchm
protobuf.js: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code
High Also affects protobufjs
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor