GHSA-94rc-8x27-4472 CVE-2026-54270
protobufjs: Memory amplification from preserved unknown fields in binary decode
- Severity
- 5.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.40%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.49% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- Fix
8.5.0- Upgrade protobufjs to this version or later
Description
Summary
protobufjs 8.2.0 added support for preserving unknown fields encountered during binary decode. Affected versions preserved unknown wire elements in message.$unknowns and did not provide a decode-time option to discard unknown fields before retaining them.
A crafted protobuf payload containing many unknown fields could therefore cause a decoded message to retain substantially more memory than the input size would suggest, even when unknown-field round-tripping is not needed. protobufjs 8.5.0 added the relevant decode-time options, allowing applications that decode untrusted protobuf data to disable unknown-field retention during decode. protobufjs 8.6.2 flips the default so unknown fields are discarded unless explicitly opted into.
Impact
An attacker who can provide protobuf binary data decoded by an application using affected protobufjs versions may be able to increase memory pressure by sending messages with many unknown fields. This can degrade availability or contribute to process termination in services that decode and retain attacker-controlled messages.
This issue affects applications that decode untrusted protobuf binary input and do not need unknown-field round-tripping. Applications that only decode trusted protobuf data, already enforce input-size/concurrency limits, or do not retain decoded messages beyond immediate processing are less directly affected.
Preconditions
- The application must decode protobuf binary data influenced by an attacker.
- The decoded schema must not define the attacker-selected field numbers, causing those fields to be treated as unknown.
- The application must use a protobufjs version that preserves unknown fields but does not provide a decode-time discard option.
- The decoded message, or enough decoded messages concurrently, must remain live long enough for retained unknown-field data to affect memory usage.
Workarounds
Upgrade to protobufjs 8.5.0 or newer and disable unknown-field preservation if not needed: Create a Reader, set reader.discardUnknown = true, and decode from that reader, or make this the default for subsequently created readers by setting Reader.discardUnknown = true. When upgrading to protobufjs 8.6.2 or newer, unknown fields are discarded by default unless opted into by setting discardUnknown = false.
Applications should also continue to enforce input-size, request concurrency, and request timeout limits at their transport or application boundary.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| protobufjs | >= 8.2.0, < 8.5.0 |
8.5.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
protobufjs npm → 8.5.0
- npm
npm install protobufjs@8.5.0- yarn
yarn add protobufjs@8.5.0- pnpm
pnpm add protobufjs@8.5.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
- Architecture and Design: Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery. Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
- Operation, Architecture and Design: Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems. When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users. Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-j3f2-48v5-ccww protobufjs: Denial of Service via infinite loop in .proto option parsing | High | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-jfj6-75fj-8934 protobufjs: Text Format string map parsing can mutate returned map object prototype | Medium | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-wcpc-wj8m-hjx6 protobufjs: Denial of service through unbounded Any expansion during JSON conversion | High | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-f38q-mgvj-vph7 protobufjs : Schema-derived names can shadow runtime-significant properties | Medium | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-jggg-4jg4-v7c6 protobufjs: Denial of Service via unbounded recursive JSON descriptor expansion | High | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-2pr8-phx7-x9h3 protobuf.js: Denial of service from crafted field names in generated code | Medium | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-66ff-xgx4-vchm protobuf.js: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code | High | Also affects protobufjs |
| GHSA-fx83-v9x8-x52w protobuf.js: Prototype injection in generated message constructors | Medium | Also affects protobufjs |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor