Skip to content

GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr CVE-2026-102277

brace-expansion: Quadratic-time expansion of the `{a},b}` rewrite causes CPU denial of service

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.43%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.12% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE-407 Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Fix
5.0.12
Upgrade brace-expansion to this version or later

Description

Summary

Expanding {a},b}-shaped input takes time quadratic in the number of literal } characters, blocking the event loop.

Bash preserves a quirk where a brace group followed by a comma set still expands ({a},b}). The parser implements this by rewriting the string and restarting the scan. Each pass absorbs exactly one } and re-scans from the beginning, so n trailing braces cost n full passes.

Reproduction

const build = n => '{a}' + '}'.repeat(n) + ',z}'

for (const n of [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) {
  const t = Date.now()
  expand(build(n))
  console.log(n, Date.now() - t + 'ms')
}
n input time results
8,000 8 KB 110 ms 2
16,000 16 KB 446 ms 2
32,000 32 KB 1.7 s 2
64,000 64 KB 6.9 s 2
128,000 128 KB 27.7 s 2

ms/n^2 is flat at ~1.7 and each doubling of n costs exactly 4.0x - quadratic. 128 KB of input blocks the event loop for nearly half a minute to produce two results.

Mechanism

Instrumenting the rewrite branch confirms it runs exactly n + 1 times, once per literal }, each re-scanning the whole string.

There is a second multiplier. The rewrite replaces the group's closing } with the internal escClose sentinel, which is '\0CLOSE' + Math.random() + '\0' - about 25 characters. The working string therefore grows by ~25 characters on every pass:

n input length final string length
1,000 1,006 26,006
8,000 8,006 208,006

So the input is inflated roughly 26x, and that factor multiplies both the quadratic constant and peak memory. This makes it partly a memory-pressure issue as well as a CPU one.

Why max and maxLength do not help

The cost is in parsing, before the result set exists. The payload yields 2 results regardless of size, so neither bound is ever reached.

Impact

An application passing an untrusted pattern to expand(), directly or through minimatch / glob, can have its event loop blocked for tens of seconds by a payload well under minimatch's 65,536-character cap. For a single-threaded Node server that is a full stall, not just a slow request.

Degraded availability rather than a crash - the process recovers once the expansion completes.

Affected versions

Verified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, all within a few percent of each other (~460-490 ms at n=16,000).

Patch

The rewrite loop gets an iteration bound. Past the cap the remaining string is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, consistent with the existing max / maxLength caps, which truncate rather than throw.

Note this bounds the number of passes, not the cost of each: worst-case work remains proportional to cap x input length. The cap is set low enough that the residual is bounded in practice, and far above what any realistic {a},b} input needs.

Severity note

Scored 5.3 Medium (A:L) for consistency with GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp, the other algorithmic-complexity advisory on this package (CWE-407), which uses the same vector. The stack-exhaustion advisories on this package score A:H because they crash the process outright; this one stalls it.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
brace-expansion
>= 4.0.0, < 5.0.12
5.0.12
brace-expansion
>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.9
3.0.9
brace-expansion
>= 2.0.0, < 2.1.7
2.1.7
brace-expansion
< 1.1.21
1.1.21
brace-expansion
>= 4.0.0, < 5.0.12
5.0.12
brace-expansion
>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.9
3.0.9
brace-expansion
>= 2.0.0, < 2.1.7
2.1.7
brace-expansion
< 1.1.21
1.1.21

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

brace-expansion npm → 5.0.12

npm
npm install brace-expansion@5.0.12
yarn
yarn add brace-expansion@5.0.12
pnpm
pnpm add brace-expansion@5.0.12

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity

An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7
brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion on nested brace groups causing stack exhaustion
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p
brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion in parseCommaParts causing stack exhaustion
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
brace-expansion: DoS via unbounded intermediate arrays, bypassing the CVE-2026-14257 mitigation
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg
brace-expansion: DoS via unbounded expansion length causing an out-of-memory process crash
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
brace-expansion: DoS via exponential-time expansion of consecutive non-expanding {} groups
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-jxxr-4gwj-5jf2
brace-expansion: Large numeric range defeats documented `max` DoS protection
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v
brace-expansion: Zero-step sequence causes process hang and memory exhaustion
High Also affects brace-expansion
GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw
brace-expansion Regular Expression Denial of Service vulnerability
Low Also affects brace-expansion

Credits: G-Rath, katzj

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor