GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp CVE-2026-13149
brace-expansion: DoS via exponential-time expansion of consecutive non-expanding {} groups
- Severity
- 7.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.36%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 30.25% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
5.0.7- Upgrade brace-expansion to this version or later
Description
Summary
brace-expansion's expand() exhibits exponential-time - O(2ⁿ) - behavior in the number of consecutive non-expanding {} groups. A short, all-ASCII input (~90 bytes/30 groups) blocks the calling thread for minutes; a slightly longer input hangs it effectively indefinitely. Because the dominant consumers run on Node's single-threaded event loop, one small input can fully stall a worker/process.
In expand_, post is computed unconditionally at the top of the function, before the early-return branches that don't use it:
const post = m.post.length ? expand_(m.post, max, false) : ['']; // always recurses
...
if (!isSequence && !isOptions) {
if (m.post.match(/,(?!,).*\}/)) {
str = m.pre + '{' + m.body + escClose + m.post;
return expand_(str, max, true); // restart — `post` discarded
}
return [str];
}
For input like a{},{},…, the first {} is non-expanding, so control reaches the {a},b} rewrite branch - but expand_ has already recursed into post over the entire remaining tail, only to throw the result away.
Each level therefore spawns two recursive expansions over essentially the same remaining work: T(n) = 2·T(n−1) ⇒ O(2ⁿ).
The max option does not mitigate this: max only bounds the output-building loops; neither the post recursion nor the rewrite recursion consults it.
Measured on 5.0.6:
| groups (n) | input bytes | time |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 60 | 130 ms |
| 24 | 72 | 1.9 s |
| 26 | 78 | 7.8 s |
| 30 (PoC) | 90 | ~2 min |
Proof of concept
const { expand } = require('brace-expansion');
// 30 non-expanding groups, ~90 bytes — blocks for minutes:
expand('a{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{}');
Impact
Any application that passes attacker-influenced strings to brace-expansion.expand() - directly or transitively via minimatch/glob brace patterns - can be driven into a multi-minute-to-indefinite CPU hang by a tiny request, denying service on that thread/process.
Remediation
Upgrade to a patched release. The fix:
- Defers computing post until after the early-return branches (and computes it locally in the $-suffix branch), so post is only expanded when a brace set actually expands and the value is used. This alone removes the exponential.
- Converts the {a},b} rewrite from recursion to an in-function loop, so a long run of rewrites cannot grow the call stack.
Verified: the PoC drops from ~2 min to 0.55 ms, 5,000 groups complete in ~344 ms, and output is identical to 5.0.6 across a behavioral-equivalence suite (sequences, padding, $-prefix, a{},b}c, {},a}b, x{{a,b}}y, etc.). Post-fix complexity is ~O(n²) on this input class - acceptable for the security fix; a linear rewrite can be a non-urgent follow-up.
If immediate upgrade isn't possible, avoid passing untrusted input to expand() / glob brace patterns, or run such expansion under a timeout/worker.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| brace-expansion | >= 3.0.0, < 5.0.7 |
5.0.7 |
| brace-expansion | < 1.1.16 |
1.1.16 |
| brace-expansion | >= 2.0.0, < 2.1.2 |
2.1.2 |
| brace-expansion | >= 3.0.0, < 5.0.7 |
5.0.7 |
| brace-expansion | < 1.1.16 |
1.1.16 |
| brace-expansion | >= 2.0.0, < 2.1.2 |
2.1.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
brace-expansion npm → 5.0.7
- npm
npm install brace-expansion@5.0.7- yarn
yarn add brace-expansion@5.0.7- pnpm
pnpm add brace-expansion@5.0.7
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 7.7
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Proof of concept
- Scope
- N
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached.
References
Advisories
Fixes and patches
- github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/122
- github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/123
- github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/835d6be91201122d9adffb0c0c8c0941…
- github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/c7e33ec13ac1a684c116720843ce24e2…
- github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/d74e63030c012e3b7ae81657b8d66561…
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7 brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion on nested brace groups causing stack exhaustion | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr brace-expansion: Quadratic-time expansion of the `{a},b}` rewrite causes CPU denial of service | Medium | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion in parseCommaParts causing stack exhaustion | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895 brace-expansion: DoS via unbounded intermediate arrays, bypassing the CVE-2026-14257 mitigation | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg brace-expansion: DoS via unbounded expansion length causing an out-of-memory process crash | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-jxxr-4gwj-5jf2 brace-expansion: Large numeric range defeats documented `max` DoS protection | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v brace-expansion: Zero-step sequence causes process hang and memory exhaustion | High | Also affects brace-expansion |
| GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw brace-expansion Regular Expression Denial of Service vulnerability | Low | Also affects brace-expansion |
Credits: bnbdr, juliangruber, ljharb
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor