Skip to content

GHSA-78g4-xqwv-q3g8

Pillow: Bundled libopenjp2 2.5.4 in all wheels since 11.1.0 carries OSV-2025-219 heap-buffer-overflow write reachable from Image.open().load()

High PyPI
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
—
No score published
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1395 Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
Fix
13.0.0
Upgrade pillow to this version or later

Description

Summary

Every Pillow wheel from 11.1.0 onward bundles a libopenjp2 containing a heap-buffer-overflow write that is fixed upstream on master but has never appeared in an OpenJPEG release. See https://osv.dev/vulnerability/OSV-2025-219

Because the wheel bundles its own copy, a patched host OS does not help. It is reachable from Image.open(fp); im.load() with default settings.

I am reporting it here rather than only upstream because Pillow is where the vulnerable binary actually reaches users.

Note the inversion that makes this easy to miss: OpenJPEG 2.5.2 and earlier are safe. The bug was introduced in 954c6e3c (2024-06-25), so keeping the dependency current is what creates the exposure.

Details

Affected wheels

From .github/dependencies.json (openjpeg) at each tag:

Pillow bundled OpenJPEG status
10.4.0 2.5.2 safe
11.0.0 2.5.2 safe
11.1.0, 11.2.1, 11.3.0 2.5.3 affected
12.0.0 … 12.3.0 2.5.4 affected

Confirmed on an installed wheel: PIL.features.version_codec('jpg_2000') → 2.5.4, bundled file pillow.libs/libopenjp2-*.so.2.5.4. main still pins 2.5.4 as of 2026-10-06.

The defect

src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c, in opj_j2k_read_sod:

OPJ_UINT32 l_current_tile_part =
    l_cstr_index->tile_index[p_j2k->m_current_tile_number].current_tpsno;
l_cstr_index->tile_index[...].tp_index[l_current_tile_part].end_header = l_current_pos;
l_cstr_index->tile_index[...].tp_index[l_current_tile_part].end_pos   =
    l_current_pos + p_j2k->m_specific_param.m_decoder.m_sot_length + 2;

tp_index is neither null-checked nor bounds-checked, and l_current_tile_part comes directly from the one-byte TPsot field of the SOT marker.

The correct guard already exists a few lines later in opj_j2k_add_tlmarker (j2k.c:8459), writing the same array at the same index behind if (tp_index && l_current_tile_part < nb_tps). One writer checked, its sibling not.

Reached by giving the codestream a valid TLM marker — so tp_index is allocated once by opj_j2k_build_tp_index_from_tlm, sized to the TLM entry count, and opj_j2k_read_sot then skips all resizing — while setting TNsot = 0 in every SOT, which keeps the TLM "valid" and lets TPsot walk past the allocation.

Patch status

Fixed upstream in 91d08b11 ("Fix heap buffer overlfow in opj_j2k_read_sod", 2026-02-10).

The newest OpenJPEG tag is v2.5.4 (2025-09-20), and compare/v2.5.4...91d08b11 reports ahead 6, behind 0 — the fix is in no release, 8 months on.

Suggested remediation

  1. Carry 91d08b11 as a patch in the wheel build until an OpenJPEG release includes it — three lines, identical to a guard already present in the same file.
  2. Consider asking OpenJPEG to cut a release; they have had an unreleased memory-corruption fix on master since February 2026, and every distro is shipping the vulnerable code.
  3. Your security handbook already tells applications to block EPS at the application layer. A similarly explicit note that Image.open() ignores filename/Content-Type and will reach any compiled-in codec unless formats= is passed would help downstream apps a lot.

Not a Pillow bug, but relevant: the extension allowlist most apps rely on does not apply

Image.open() sniffs magic bytes, so a JPEG 2000 codestream in a file named avatar.png declared Content-Type: image/png reaches the JP2 decoder anyway.

I verified this against a production service documenting PNG/JPEG-only uploads: it accepted and fully decoded a JP2 through exactly that path, with 16 formats reachable from one upload endpoint against 43 registered openers. That service has since fixed it by passing formats= and validating on the detected format rather than the client's Content-Type.

That is the reason a decoder-level issue like this one has much wider reach than downstream maintainers tend to assume.

Proof of concept

ASan build of OpenJPEG 2.5.4 interposed under a stock Pillow 12.3.0, running Image.open(p); im.load():

==766332==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
WRITE of size 8
    #0 opj_j2k_read_sod          j2k.c:5086
    #1 opj_j2k_read_tile_header  j2k.c:9912
    #2 opj_read_tile_header      openjpeg.c:575
    #3 j2k_decode_entry          src/libImaging/Jpeg2KDecode.c:793
    #4 ImagingJpeg2KDecode       src/libImaging/Jpeg2KDecode.c:949
    #5 _decode                   src/decode.c:132
located 8 bytes to the right of a 24-byte region allocated by
    opj_j2k_build_tp_index_from_tlm j2k.c:8939

Frames 3–5 are Pillow's own decoder, not a synthetic harness. No non-default decoder options are involved; strict mode is on, which is Pillow's behaviour since Pillow never calls opj_decoder_set_strict_mode. A benign twin image runs the same path cleanly and returns a valid image, so this is the payload and not a parse failure.

I have deliberately not attached the PoC file to this initial report. I'm happy to attach the PoC, the builder script and the RIP-control harness here on request, or hold everything until a fix is ready.

No disclosure deadline from me; I will not publish anything while this is being worked on.

Impact

Any application that calls Image.open() / im.load() on an image it did not produce — the overwhelmingly common case for upload handlers, thumbnailers and preview pipelines — can be made to perform an out-of-bounds heap write by supplying one crafted file.

Floor, already certain. On a stock non-sanitised wheel the overflow performs 245 writes walking to +5856 bytes past a 24-byte allocation, and glibc's own heap-metadata checker aborts the process (corrupted size vs. prev_size, corrupted double-linked list, SIGABRT). One file reliably kills a long-lived worker.

Ceiling, demonstrated as a primitive but not as a finished exploit. With same-size-class objects alive on both sides — an ordinary busy heap — the walk crosses opj_event_mgr_t, which holds three opj_msg_callback function pointers, and opj_event_msg then calls one (event.c:136):

rip  0x4000    <- value chosen by the attacker's file layout
rsi  0x3ff2    <- m_error_data, written by the same walk

Shifting the codestream with a COM marker moves rip with it (0x16ce → 0x4000), so the instruction pointer is attacker-chosen rather than incidentally invalid. A benign control image leaves the same groomed heap untouched.

To be explicit about what I did not do: I have not built a working exploit. That additionally needs remote heap grooming and an ASLR defeat, and I attempted neither. I am reporting a controlled control-flow primitive, not a finished chain. The CVSS AC:H reflects that.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pillow
>= 11.1.0, < 13.0.0
13.0.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pillow PyPI → 13.0.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "pillow>=13.0.0"
poetry
poetry add "pillow>=13.0.0"
uv
uv add "pillow>=13.0.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1395: Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component

The product has a dependency on a third-party component that contains one or more known vulnerabilities.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements, Policy: In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed.
  • Requirements: Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, require a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) [REF-1247] [REF-1311].
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation, Integration, Manufacturing: Maintain a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). According to [REF-1247], "An SBOM is a formal, machine-readable inventory of software components and dependencies, information about those components, and their hierarchical relationships."
  • Operation, Patching and Maintenance: Actively monitor when a third-party component vendor announces vulnerability patches; fix the third-party component as soon as possible; and make it easy for operators/customers to obtain and apply the patch.
  • Operation, Patching and Maintenance: Continuously monitor changes in each of the product's components, especially when the changes indicate new vulnerabilities, end-of-life (EOL) plans, etc.

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Implementation: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space. If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
  • Operation, Build and Compilation: Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking. For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
  • Operation: Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment. For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
  • Implementation: Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
PYSEC-2023-175
Pillow versions before v10.0.1 bundled libwebp binaries in wheels that are vulnerable to CVE-2023-5129 (previously CVE-2023-4863).
High Known exploited Also affects pillow
GHSA-j7hp-h8jx-5ppr
libwebp: OOB write in BuildHuffmanTable
High Known exploited Also affects pillow
GHSA-654x-cwwv-5j9c
Pillow: Arrow export leaks stale heap memory when PILLOW_ALIGNMENT > 1
Medium Also affects pillow
GHSA-xvh5-g6gv-559v
Pillow: Memory disclosure and segfault in libtiff encoder via crafted TIFF tags
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-g7cr-3p24-7wf7
Pillow: Heap buffer overflow writing JPEG comment after ICC profile fills buffer
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-9v9v-9qvf-h2hj
Pillow: Heap over-read in WMF/EMF rendering via 16-bit dimension truncation (Windows builds)
High Also affects pillow
GHSA-g4qv-2jxx-769h
Pillow: PNG eXIf chunk makes EXIF parsing run in quadratic time
Medium Also affects pillow
GHSA-3j72-p6qg-6xp7
Pillow: TarIO negative size field causes infinite CPU-spin loop
Medium Also affects pillow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor