Skip to content

GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v CVE-2026-72802 GO-2026-6398

SiYuan: Absolute filesystem path and OS username disclosure via resolveAssetPath

Medium Go
Severity
6.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.31% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
0.0.0-20260724095509-eee3410aa131
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72802.

Summary

POST /api/asset/resolveAssetPath returns the resolved absolute filesystem path of an asset, unmodified. The route is CheckAuth-only, so it is reachable by the publish RoleReader token and by the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false. An anonymous reader who knows any asset's relative path trivially harvested from an <img src="assets/…"> in any published document receives the server's absolute workspace path, disclosing the operating-system username and the installation layout.

Details

// kernel/api/asset.go: resolveAssetPath
p, err := model.GetAssetAbsPathInBox(path, "")   // boxID="" → absolute workspace path
...
ret.Data = p                                     // returned raw, no stripping

GetAssetAbsPathInBox(path, "") resolves under util.DataDir / util.WorkspaceDir, producing a full host path such as C:\Users\<username>\SiYuan\data\assets\foo.png or /home/<user>/…. The handler returns it directly with no redaction and no publish-scope check.

This is data the project already treats as sensitive. getConf explicitly zeroes System.WorkspaceDir, AppDir, ConfDir, DataDir, and HomeDir when util.IsBrowserRequest(c), a change made specifically to avoid leaking the username (issue #17410). resolveAssetPath performs no equivalent stripping, so it re-exposes precisely the values getConf was patched to hide.

Related unfiltered siblings in the same file, also CheckAuth-only with no publish scoping:

  • getMissingAssets: workspace-wide list of missing asset references
  • getUnusedAssets: every unused asset filename in the assets directory

Both return asset inventory spanning all documents, including publish-forbidden ones.

Verified at origin/master: resolveAssetPath returns the absolute path with no redaction, getConf contains the IsBrowserRequest stripping; all three routes are registered CheckAuth without CheckAdminRole.

Proof of Concept

Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account.

1. Harvest an asset path: open any published document and read a relative asset path from its markup, e.g. assets/foo-20260101120000-abcdefg.png.

2. Resolve it as an anonymous reader:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/asset/resolveAssetPath
{"path":"assets/foo-20260101120000-abcdefg.png"}

3. Result: the response returns the absolute host path, e.g. C:\Users\<username>\SiYuan\data\assets\foo-...png disclosing the OS username and the full workspace/installation layout.

Control: getConf from the same anonymous session returns WorkspaceDir/DataDir/HomeDir blanked, confirming the project intends these values to be withheld from browser requests.

Related:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/asset/getUnusedAssets   {}
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/asset/getMissingAssets  {}

Return workspace-wide asset inventory with no publish scoping.

Impact

An anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish RoleReader obtains the server's absolute workspace path, which typically embeds the OS username, plus the installation directory layout. This is useful for targeting subsequent attacks (path construction, user enumeration, social engineering) and directly contradicts the redaction the project applies in getConf. The related endpoints additionally disclose workspace-wide asset inventory, including assets referenced only by publish-forbidden documents. Confidentiality-only.

Suggested fix

Apply the same redaction getConf uses: for browser/reader requests, return the asset path relative to the workspace root rather than the absolute host path (or omit it entirely). Add publish-access scoping to getUnusedAssets and getMissingAssets so their results are limited to documents the caller may see.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260724095509-eee3410aa131
0.0.0-20260724095509-eee3410aa131

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260724095509-eee3410aa131

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260724095509-eee3410aa131 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 6.9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor