GHSA-jmp9-x22r-554x CVE-2025-41249
Spring Framework annotation detection mechanism may result in improper authorization
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.48%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.27% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
6.2.11- Upgrade org.springframework:spring-core to this version or later
Description
The Spring Framework annotation detection mechanism may not correctly resolve annotations on methods within type hierarchies with a parameterized super type with unbounded generics. This can be an issue if such annotations are used for authorization decisions.
Your application may be affected by this if you are using Spring Security's @EnableMethodSecurity feature.
You are not affected by this if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity or if you do not use security annotations on methods in generic superclasses or generic interfaces.
This CVE is published in conjunction with CVE-2025-41248 https://spring.io/security/cve-2025-41248 .
Affected versions
Maven
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| org.springframework:spring-core | >= 5.3.0, <= 5.3.44 |
No fix yet |
| org.springframework:spring-core | >= 6.0.0, <= 6.1.22 |
No fix yet |
| org.springframework:spring-core | >= 6.2.0, < 6.2.11 |
6.2.11 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
org.springframework:spring-core Maven → 6.2.11
- maven
<dependency><groupId>org.springframework</groupId><artifactId>spring-core</artifactId><version>6.2.11</version></dependency>- gradle
implementation("org.springframework:spring-core:6.2.11")
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-285: Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-659m-px2c-25wj Spring Framework Denial of Service via AntPathMatcher | High | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-r4q3-7g4q-x89m Spring Framework server Web DoS Vulnerability | High | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-rfmp-97jj-h8m6 Improper Output Neutralization for Logs in Spring Framework | Medium | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-wv88-pf73-x22p Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code in Spring Framework | High | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-f866-m9mv-2xr3 Spring Framework and Spring Security vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data | Medium | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-rhcg-rwhx-qj3j Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory in Spring Framework | Medium | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-wjjr-h4wh-w6vv Spring Framework Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity | Medium | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
| GHSA-6gf2-pvqw-37ph Log entry injection in Spring Framework | Medium | Also affects org.springframework:spring-core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor