Skip to content

GHSA-jj36-r9w3-3pfh CVE-2026-50136

Budibase: Unauthenticated S3 signed upload URL generation allows arbitrary writes with stored datasource credentials

Medium npm
Severity
7.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.29%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 21.63% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
3.39.2
Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later

Description

The application server exposes an unauthenticated endpoint that generates S3 PutObject presigned URLs using credentials stored in a workspace datasource. The route is protected only by the recaptcha middleware and does not require authentication, table permission, datasource permission, or builder access. A public caller who knows a workspace ID and S3 datasource ID can request a signed upload URL for attacker-controlled bucket and key values.

Details

The static route registers the signed upload URL endpoint with only recaptcha before the controller:

  • packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts:44-48
44:  .post(
45:    "/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url",
46:    recaptcha,
47:    controller.getSignedUploadURL
48:  )

The controller loads the datasource by datasourceId with enriched secret values:

  • packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:590-598
590:export const getSignedUploadURL = async function (
591:  ctx: Ctx<GetSignedUploadUrlRequest, GetSignedUploadUrlResponse>
592:) {
593:  // Ensure datasource is valid
594:  let datasource
595:  try {
596:    const { datasourceId } = ctx.params
597:    datasource = await sdk.datasources.get(datasourceId, { enriched: true })
598:    if (!datasource) {

The request body controls bucket and key, and the server signs a PUT URL using the stored datasource credentials:

  • packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:609-629
609:  if (datasource?.source === "S3") {
610:    const { bucket, key } = ctx.request.body || {}
611:    if (!bucket || !key) {
612:      ctx.throw(400, "bucket and key values are required")
613:    }
614:    try {
615:      let endpoint = datasource?.config?.endpoint
616:      if (endpoint && !utils.urlHasProtocol(endpoint)) {
617:        endpoint = `https://${endpoint}`
618:      }
619:      const s3 = new S3({
620:        region: awsRegion,
621:        endpoint: endpoint,
622:        credentials: {
623:          accessKeyId: datasource?.config?.accessKeyId as string,
624:          secretAccessKey: datasource?.config?.secretAccessKey as string,
625:        },
626:      })
627:      const params = { Bucket: bucket, Key: key }
628:      signedUrl = await getSignedUrl(s3, new PutObjectCommand(params))
629:      if (endpoint) {

The endpoint returns the signed URL and public URL to the caller:

  • packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:630-639
630:        publicUrl = `${endpoint}/${bucket}/${key}`
631:      } else {
632:        publicUrl = `https://${bucket}.s3.${awsRegion}.amazonaws.com/${key}`
633:      }
634:    } catch (error: any) {
635:      ctx.throw(400, error)
636:    }
637:  }
638:
639:  ctx.body = { signedUrl, publicUrl }

Because no authorization middleware is applied, the API trusts public input to choose where the stored S3 credentials will write.

PoC

Non-destructive validation approach:

  1. Create or identify a workspace with an S3 datasource.
  2. Obtain the production workspace ID and S3 datasource ID.
  3. Send an unauthenticated request with the workspace ID header and attacker-controlled bucket/key:
POST /api/attachments/<datasourceId>/url HTTP/1.1
x-budibase-app-id: app_<workspace-id>
content-type: application/json

{"bucket":"attacker-controlled-or-permitted-bucket","key":"poc/budibase.txt"}
  1. Observe that the response contains a signed PUT URL.
  2. Upload harmless content to the returned signedUrl and confirm the object is created using the datasource's stored S3 credentials.

Impact

This allows unauthenticated arbitrary object writes wherever the stored S3 datasource credentials have PutObject access. Depending on the datasource permissions, this can corrupt application data, overwrite public assets, place attacker-controlled objects in trusted buckets, consume storage, or abuse an organization's cloud credentials.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@budibase/server
< 3.39.2
3.39.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@budibase/server npm → 3.39.2

npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.2
yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.2
pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx
Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url`
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7
Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7
Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435
Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr
Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm
Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr
Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF)
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2
Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector
High Also affects @budibase/server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor