Skip to content

GHSA-hf8h-97gm-4x2p CVE-2026-73605 GO-2026-6626

SiYuan: getUniqueFilename passes an unvalidated client-supplied path to the filesystem, giving anonymous readers an existence oracle over the entire host filesystem

Medium Go
Severity
6.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.33%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 25.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
0.0.0-20260812083335-251596fc0de2
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

Summary

/api/file/getUniqueFilename takes a path from the request body and passes it to a filesystem existence check with no validation, confinement or authorization. The response distinguishes paths that exist from paths that do not, so an anonymous reader in publish mode can probe arbitrary locations on the host, one request per probe. Files and directories both work.

Every neighbouring file route either requires an administrator or confines the path first.

Details

Route. kernel/api/router.go:289 on master, :292 on the development branch, CheckAuth only.

Handler, kernel/api/file.go:84, in full:

util.ParseJsonArgs(arg, ret, util.BindJsonArg("path", &filePath, true, true))
ret.Data = map[string]any{"path": util.GetUniqueFilename(filePath)}

The argument binder does no path handling. util.BindJsonArg (kernel/util/net.go:365) takes two booleans, required (the key must be present) and rejectEmpty (the value must be non-empty). That is its entire contract. There is no filepath.Clean, no workspace join, no traversal check. An absolute path outside the workspace reaches gulu.File.IsExist unmodified.

The oracle. util/file.go:67:

if !gulu.File.IsExist(filePath) {
    return filePath
}
// otherwise loop, returning the first non-existent dir/base (i).ext

Input echoed back means the path does not exist. A (1) suffix means it does.

The asymmetry.

Route Middleware
putFile, copyFile, globalCopyFiles, workspaceCopyFiles, removeFile, renameFile CheckAuth, CheckAdminRole, CheckReadonly
readDir (directory enumeration) CheckAuth, CheckAdminRole
getFile CheckAuth, but GetAbsPathInWorkspace returns 403 on escape, plus rejectEncryptedBoxPath and a publish-access check
getUniqueFilename CheckAuth, nothing else

getFile binds the identical BindJsonArg("path", &filePath, true, true) and confines it as its first action.

Proof of Concept

Kernel 3.7.2, publish mode on port 6808, Publish.Auth.Enable false, anonymous client. Reader context confirmed by getChildBlocks returning HTTP 403 on the same session.

{"path":"/etc/passwd"}
→ {"code":0,"msg":"","data":{"path":"/etc/passwd (1)"}}

{"path":"/etc/shadow"}
→ {"code":0,"msg":"","data":{"path":"/etc/shadow (1)"}}

{"path":"/etc/definitely-not-here"}
→ {"code":0,"msg":"","data":{"path":"/etc/definitely-not-here"}}

Directories behave the same way:

{"path":"/root"}      → {"path":"/root (1)"}
{"path":"/rootnope"}  → {"path":"/rootnope"}

And within the workspace, confirming whether a specific document file exists:

{"path":"<workspace>/data/<boxID>/<docID>.sy"}  → "<...> (1).sy"
{"path":"<workspace>/data/nope-no-such.sy"}     → echoed unchanged

Impact

An anonymous reader in publish mode, or any publish RoleReader, determines whether arbitrary paths exist on the host. Because directories respond the same way as files, the filesystem can be walked rather than only guessed at. This supports identifying the operating-system user's home directory, detecting installed software, backup and synchronisation directories, mapping the workspace layout, and confirming the existence of specific documents by probing their storage paths.

It also composes with the absolute workspace path returned elsewhere, which supplies a concrete prefix rather than requiring guesswork, and it recovers the operating-system username that the browser-request path strip added under issue #17410 was introduced to conceal.

Scoped precisely: nothing is read and nothing is written. This is an existence and layout disclosure, valuable primarily as a reconnaissance step.

Suggested fix

Confine the path as the adjacent getFile route does, by routing filePath through util.GetAbsPathInWorkspace and returning 403 on escape, or add CheckAdminRole and CheckReadonly to match readDir. The frontend uses this endpoint only for naming uploads and assets inside the workspace, so neither change affects legitimate use.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260812083335-251596fc0de2
0.0.0-20260812083335-251596fc0de2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260812083335-251596fc0de2

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260812083335-251596fc0de2 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 6.9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 5.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor