Skip to content

GHSA-h6w7-xxcf-w2mq CVE-2026-72795 GO-2026-6425

SiYuan: Embedded (transclusion) block content is returned without publish-access filtering, leaking private and password-protected document content to anonymous readers

Critical Go
Severity
9.2 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.31% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
0.0.0-20260725125659-1ca1c3c9d94b
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72795.

Summary

/api/block/getBlockDOMWithEmbed and /api/block/getBlockDOMsWithEmbed gate only the requested block against publish access. The blocks pulled in by that block's embed (transclusion) query are inlined into the returned DOM with no publish-access check at all, so a reader who requests a legitimately-published block containing an embed query receives the content of every block that query matched including blocks in hidden, forbidden and password-protected documents.

The dedicated embed endpoint getEmbedBlock filters these same results for reader roles. The DOM-with-embed path does not.

Details

Item Detail
Routes kernel/api/router.go:226 POST /api/block/getBlockDOMWithEmbed → model.CheckAuth → getBlockDOMWithEmbed; :227 POST /api/block/getBlockDOMsWithEmbed → model.CheckAuth → getBlockDOMsWithEmbed
Middleware CheckAuth only — no CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole → reachable by the publish RoleReader token, and anonymously when Publish.Auth.Enable is false
Guard present Top-level requested block only. Singular: password + disable checks on the requested id. Plural: filterBlockDOMsByPublishAccess over the requested ids.
Guard absent The embedded blocks resolved from the query
Exposed Content HTML of every block matched by the embed query, regardless of that block's publish visibility or password tier

The leak path. getBlockDOMWithEmbed → GetBlockDOMsWithEmbedInBox → resolveEmbedContentInBox (kernel/model/block.go:976). That function walks the tree for NodeBlockQueryEmbed, extracts the embed SQL, executes sql.SelectBlocksRawStmtInBox(stmt, ...), builds embedContents from each matched block's content HTML, and inlines the result via SetIALAttr("embed-content", ...).

resolveEmbedContentInBox takes no publishAccess parameter and contains no filtering: FilterEmbedBlocks, CheckBlockIdAccessableByPublishAccess, CheckPathAccessable, publishAccess and IsReadOnlyRoleContext all return zero matches in that function and its call path. The top-level gate therefore passes on the requested block, and the response body carries content the reader has no access to.

Embed queries in published documents routinely span the entire workspace by design, dashboard documents, "all my TODOs" aggregations, tag or attribute rollups. The reader does not need to construct anything: requesting an already-published document that contains such an embed is sufficient. If the publish frontend renders embedded blocks through this endpoint, the disclosure occurs passively during normal viewing of any published document containing an embed block.

Guarded sibling. getEmbedBlock (kernel/api/router.go:212), which is also reader-reachable and returns embed query results, applies model.FilterEmbedBlocksByPublishAccess(c, publishAccess, blocks) for reader roles (kernel/model/search.go:38). The same class of data is filtered there and unfiltered here.

Scope note. A prior review of getBlockDOMsWithEmbed confirmed that the per-id publish gate is correctly applied to the requested ids. That observation is accurate and is not in dispute, this report concerns the embedded blocks resolved downstream in resolveEmbedContentInBox, which are not covered by that gate.

Proof of Concept

Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account. A published document containing an embed query whose results include at least one block in a non-published or password-protected document.

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/block/getBlockDOMWithEmbed
{"id":"<id of a published block containing an embed query>"}

→ 200
   The returned DOM contains embed-content attributes carrying the
   content HTML of blocks in documents the reader has no publish
   access to.

Differential check against the filtered sibling, using the same reader session and the same underlying query:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/search/getEmbedBlock
{"stmt":"<the same embed query>"}

→ 200, results filtered by FilterEmbedBlocksByPublishAccess

The filtered endpoint withholds the private blocks; the DOM endpoint returns their content.

The plural route behaves identically for each requested id:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/block/getBlockDOMsWithEmbed
{"ids":["<published block containing an embed query>"]}

Impact

An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish RoleReader can read the content of blocks in documents that are not published, are marked hidden or forbidden, or are protected by a publish password, by requesting a published block that transcludes them. Because embed queries in aggregation-style published documents commonly match across the whole workspace, the volume of exposed content is bounded only by what the author's embed queries happen to match, not by anything under the reader's control being unusual. Confidentiality-only; no integrity or availability impact.

Suggested fix

Thread the request's publishAccess context into resolveEmbedContentInBox and, when IsReadOnlyRoleContext holds, drop any matched block failing CheckBlockIdAccessableByPublishAccess and the password-tier check before its content is written into embed-content mirroring the treatment getEmbedBlock already gives the same data via FilterEmbedBlocksByPublishAccess.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260725125659-1ca1c3c9d94b
0.0.0-20260725125659-1ca1c3c9d94b

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260725125659-1ca1c3c9d94b

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260725125659-1ca1c3c9d94b && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 9.2

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 8.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor