Skip to content

GHSA-jrq7-xrjx-pcfw CVE-2026-84320 GO-2026-6788

Nginx UI: Auto backup name allows path traversal outside validated storage path

Medium Go
Severity
6.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.17%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 5.99% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Fix
1.9.10-0.20260715121709-f92218e01054
Upgrade github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI to this version or later

Description

Summary

Nginx UI validates backup_path and storage_path against the administrator-defined backup.GrantedAccessPath boundary, but the final auto-backup output filename is built from the user-controlled auto-backup name without stripping path separators or .. components.

An authenticated user who can create or modify an auto-backup task can set a name such as task/../../../escaped. The configured storage_path still passes validation because it is inside GrantedAccessPath, but the generated backup path escapes that storage directory when filepath.Join(storage_path, filename) resolves the embedded traversal sequence.

This bypasses the documented backup path boundary and allows backup archives, and for encrypted configuration backups the adjacent .key file, to be written outside the intended storage directory with the Nginx UI process privileges.

Affected Versions

  • Current dev branch commit checked: 4948fba8744e82c3d7003f68ee164e9f49421066
  • Latest release checked: v2.3.10, published 2026-04-28
  • The vulnerable filename construction is present in both current dev and v2.3.10.

Security Boundary

The project documentation describes backup.GrantedAccessPath as the critical security boundary for backup operations. It says the setting:

  • restricts backup operations to explicitly authorized directories,
  • prevents unauthorized access to sensitive system directories,
  • enforces administrator-defined boundaries,
  • normalizes paths to prevent traversal attempts.

That boundary is enforced for the configured storage_path, but not for the final path after the backup name is appended.

Root Cause

model.AutoBackup.GetName() only trims whitespace and replaces spaces:

func (a *AutoBackup) GetName() string {
    return strings.ReplaceAll(strings.TrimSpace(a.Name), " ", "_")
}

The result is then embedded directly into filenames:

filename := fmt.Sprintf("%s_%d.zip", autoBackup.GetName(), time.Now().Unix())
outputPath = filepath.Join(autoBackup.StoragePath, filename)

and for custom directory backups:

filename := fmt.Sprintf("custom_dir_%s_%d.zip", autoBackup.GetName(), time.Now().Unix())
outputPath = filepath.Join(autoBackup.StoragePath, filename)

The API validation rules require name, backup_type, storage_type, storage_path, and cron_expression, but do not reject /, \, or .. in name. ValidateAutoBackupConfig validates backup_path and storage_path, but it does not validate the final outputPath after appending the generated filename.

Relevant paths:

  • model/auto_backup.go
  • api/backup/auto_backup.go
  • internal/backup/auto_backup.go
  • internal/backup/utils.go

Proof of Concept

The following local-only reproducer mirrors the relevant code path without contacting any external system:

name := "task/../../../escaped"
filename := fmt.Sprintf("custom_dir_%s_%d.zip", getName(name), int64(1715555555))
outputPath := filepath.Join(storageDir, filename)

Setup:

  1. Create a temporary granted directory.
  2. Set sourceDir and storageDir under that granted directory.
  3. Treat only granted as the allowed path boundary.
  4. Use the auto-backup name task/../../../escaped.
  5. Create the custom-directory backup using the same filename pattern and zip creation behavior.

Observed output:

granted_root=/Users/jagadeshachanta/.cache/tmp/nginx-ui-autobackup-poc-1538710430/granted
validated_storage_path=/Users/jagadeshachanta/.cache/tmp/nginx-ui-autobackup-poc-1538710430/granted/storage
auto_backup_name="task/../../../escaped"
constructed_filename="custom_dir_task/../../../escaped_1715555555.zip"
created_file=/Users/jagadeshachanta/.cache/tmp/nginx-ui-autobackup-poc-1538710430/escaped_1715555555.zip
escaped_validated_storage_path=true
created_file_exists=true

The configured storage path is inside the granted directory, but the created backup file is outside both the storage directory and the granted directory.

A repo-local regression test was also prepared at:

internal/backup/auto_backup_path_traversal_poc_test.go

The test cannot currently be executed cleanly in this checkout because unrelated build prerequisites fail before the package test runs:

app/app.go: pattern all:dist: no matching files found
model/cert.go: no required module provides package github.com/go-acme/lego/v5/certificate
internal/helper/key_type.go: no required module provides package github.com/go-acme/lego/v5/certcrypto

The standalone reproducer output above was therefore used as the executable proof for this report.

Impact

An authenticated user with access to the auto-backup API can bypass the administrator-configured backup storage boundary. Depending on filesystem permissions and deployment layout, this can:

  • write backup archives outside the intended storage_path,
  • write encrypted configuration backup key files outside the intended storage_path,
  • place sensitive backup material in directories that administrators did not authorize for backup storage,
  • create or overwrite timestamp-suffixed files outside the validated backup directory using the Nginx UI process privileges.

This is especially relevant because backup archives may contain Nginx UI configuration, database files, Nginx configuration, and for encrypted config backups the adjacent key file required to decrypt the archive.

Suggested Fix

Recommended defense in depth:

  1. Treat auto-backup name as a display label only, not as a filesystem path component.
  2. Sanitize generated filenames with filepath.Base or a strict allowlist such as [A-Za-z0-9._-].
  3. Reject path separators, drive separators, NUL bytes, and .. segments in name.
  4. After constructing outputPath, clean it and validate that the final path remains inside the already-validated storage_path.
  5. Add regression tests for both local and S3 temporary-file paths.

Example invariant:

cleanOutput := filepath.Clean(outputPath)
cleanStorage := filepath.Clean(autoBackup.StoragePath) + string(filepath.Separator)
if !strings.HasPrefix(cleanOutput, cleanStorage) {
    return ErrPathNotInGrantedAccess
}

Disclosure Notes

This was tested only in a local isolated environment against source code and temporary directories. No online demo systems or production systems were tested.

AI assistance was used to inspect the open-source code, prepare the local reproducer, and draft this report. The issue and PoC output were verified locally before submission.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
< 1.9.10-0.20260715121709-f92218e01054
1.9.10-0.20260715121709-f92218e01054

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI Go → 1.9.10-0.20260715121709-f92218e01054

go
go get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260715121709-f92218e01054 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GO-2026-6773
Nginx UI: Casdoor SSO callback uses a constant `state` parameter (login CSRF)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-vc32-4gwf-77xp
Nginx UI: OTP secure-session step-up can be bypassed via MCP configuration tools
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-wq4w-vwvq-q3x9
Nginx UI: Standalone short tokens survive administrative revocation in cache and authenticate again after account re-enable
Medium Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-5r62-gj48-897x
Nginx UI: MCP configuration tools bypass restricted directive validation and allow secondary authenticated users to execute NJS in Nginx worker context
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-9jww-cxg5-rj9m
Nginx UI: MCP `nginx_config_add` Bypasses Directive Validation — Authenticated RCE
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-76pm-mq2q-9gcr
Nginx UI: MCP nginx_config_add skips config directive validation → authenticated nginx directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-cf23-7qxj-xmhr
Nginx UI: nginx config directive denylist (ValidateConfigFile) is bypassable via same-line ";" separation → authenticated directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-5v7c-xpfp-p65m
Nginx UI OTP secure-session step-up is missing on sensitive mutation routes
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor