Skip to content

GHSA-gv8p-48fr-4fxg CVE-2026-48008

Shopware: Privilege Escalation via Sync API Integration Admin Flag Bypass

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.47%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 40.83% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

A non-admin API user with integration:create ACL privilege can escalate to full administrator by creating an integration with admin: true through the Sync API (POST /api/_action/sync). The regular integration endpoint (POST /api/integration) correctly blocks this, but the Sync API bypasses the controller-level check by writing directly through the DAL EntityWriter. The integration entity definition lacks WriteProtection, and the admin field has no field-level restriction flag.

OWASP: A01:2021 — Broken Access Control

Root Cause

IntegrationController::upsertIntegration() checks $source->isAdmin() before allowing the admin field to be set. However, SyncController::sync() routes writes through SyncService → EntityWriter, which only applies:

  1. AclWriteValidator — checks entity-level ACL (integration:create is sufficient)
  2. EntityProtectionValidator — checks WriteProtection on entity definitions, but IntegrationDefinition has none

The admin field in IntegrationDefinition is a plain BoolField with no WriteProtection or special flag. The Sync API writes it without restriction.

Vulnerable code path:

  • src/Core/Framework/Api/Controller/SyncController.php → SyncService → EntityWriter::upsert()
  • Missing protection: src/Core/Framework/Integration/IntegrationDefinition.php — admin field has no WriteProtection(Context::SYSTEM_SCOPE)

Working protection (bypassed):

  • src/Core/Framework/Integration/IntegrationController.php:46-56 — isAdmin() check only applies to the dedicated controller endpoint

Impact

  • Complete admin API access — the escalated integration has full read/write on every entity: users, customers, orders, system configuration, integrations, plugins
  • PII exfiltration — read all customer records (names, emails, addresses, order history)
  • Persistent backdoor — the admin integration survives password changes and user deactivation

Remediation

Add WriteProtection(Context::SYSTEM_SCOPE) to IntegrationDefinition, matching how UserDefinition and AclRoleDefinition are already protected:

// src/Core/Framework/Integration/IntegrationDefinition.php
(new BoolField('admin', 'admin'))
    ->addFlags(new WriteProtection(Context::SYSTEM_SCOPE)),

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
shopware/core
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/core
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18
shopware/platform
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/platform
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

shopware/core Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/core:^6.7.10.1

shopware/platform Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/platform:^6.7.10.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gq96-5pfx-f4vc
Shopware: SSRF in Media External-Link Endpoint Bypasses IP Validation
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-xvhc-gm7j-mhmc
Shopware: Stored XSS via SVG file upload — no SVG sanitization
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-9v5m-39wh-5chq
Shopware: Unauthorized Payment Trigger for Foreign Orders via /store-api/handle-payment
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-f8q6-3g5w-jjr6
Shopware: Admin API ACL Bypass in Order State Transition Endpoints
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-4x3x-869w-xx3m
Shopware SSO referer trust leading to an arbitrary redirect target
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-7w52-7jvm-m9vw
Shopware: Timing-attack on admin panel allowing enumeration of administrator usernames
Low Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-v39m-97p8-gqg7
Shopware: Privilege escalation: non-admin user with user:create ACL can create admin accounts
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-8v9p-g828-v98f
Shopware: Admin Account Takeover via User Recovery Hash Exposure
Medium Also affects shopware/core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor