Skip to content

GHSA-8v9p-g828-v98f CVE-2026-48009

Shopware: Admin Account Takeover via User Recovery Hash Exposure

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.8 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.65% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

A low-privilege admin user with user_recovery:read ACL can take over any admin account. The attacker triggers password recovery for the victim (unauthenticated endpoint), reads the recovery hash from the Admin API search endpoint, then uses the hash to reset the victim's password (another unauthenticated endpoint). The recovery hash — intended to be secret and delivered only via email — is fully readable through the standard entity search API.

OWASP: A01:2021 — Broken Access Control

Root Cause

The user_recovery entity exposes its hash field through the Admin API search endpoint (POST /api/search/user-recovery). The hash field lacks ApiAware(false) or ReadProtection, so any user with user_recovery:read ACL can read it.

The password recovery flow assumes the hash is delivered exclusively via email. The Admin API provides an alternative channel to obtain it, breaking this assumption.

Three endpoints combine to form the attack:

  1. POST /api/_action/user/user-recovery — triggers recovery, creates hash in DB (no auth required)
  2. POST /api/search/user-recovery — reads the hash (requires only user_recovery:read ACL)
  3. PATCH /api/_action/user/user-recovery/password — resets password using hash (no auth required)

Vulnerable code:

  • src/Core/System/User/Recovery/UserRecoveryDefinition.php — hash field is ApiAware with no ReadProtection

Impact

  • Full admin account takeover — attacker gains the highest privilege level in the system
  • All admin capabilities — user/role management, system configuration, plugin management, customer data access
  • Cascading compromise — taken-over admin account can be used to pivot to other attacks
  • Low barrier — user_recovery:read is a seemingly harmless permission that grants devastating access

Remediation

Remove the hash field from API responses:

// src/Core/System/User/Recovery/UserRecoveryDefinition.php
(new StringField('hash', 'hash'))
    ->addFlags(new Required(), new ApiAware(false)),

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
shopware/core
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/core
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18
shopware/platform
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/platform
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

shopware/core Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/core:^6.7.10.1

shopware/platform Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/platform:^6.7.10.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gq96-5pfx-f4vc
Shopware: SSRF in Media External-Link Endpoint Bypasses IP Validation
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-xvhc-gm7j-mhmc
Shopware: Stored XSS via SVG file upload — no SVG sanitization
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-9v5m-39wh-5chq
Shopware: Unauthorized Payment Trigger for Foreign Orders via /store-api/handle-payment
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-f8q6-3g5w-jjr6
Shopware: Admin API ACL Bypass in Order State Transition Endpoints
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-4x3x-869w-xx3m
Shopware SSO referer trust leading to an arbitrary redirect target
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-7w52-7jvm-m9vw
Shopware: Timing-attack on admin panel allowing enumeration of administrator usernames
Low Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-v39m-97p8-gqg7
Shopware: Privilege escalation: non-admin user with user:create ACL can create admin accounts
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-gv8p-48fr-4fxg
Shopware: Privilege Escalation via Sync API Integration Admin Flag Bypass
Medium Also affects shopware/core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor