Skip to content

GHSA-f8q6-3g5w-jjr6 CVE-2026-48014

Shopware: Admin API ACL Bypass in Order State Transition Endpoints

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.39%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 32.98% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

This is a vertical authorization bypass in the Admin API affecting order state transition features (/api/_action/order/{orderId}/state/{transition} and similar transaction/delivery transition routes). The root cause is that the transition action routes do not declare required server-side ACL privileges, allowing low-privileged users to pass the authorization boundary. As a result, authenticated users without order:update can still change order states, causing real security impact such as operational integrity loss, automation workflow misuse, and fulfillment/settlement/support process disruption.

Description

Shopware’s permission model requires server-side enforcement independent of UI guards. However, the dedicated order-state transition action endpoints are missing ACL metadata, so accounts without regular order update privileges can still submit transition requests that are processed by the backend. In real reproduction, the same low-privileged account receives 403 on the normal order update API, while the transition action API succeeds with 200 and updates order state in the database. The key point is that reproduction is possible through direct API calls regardless of UI access restrictions or hidden buttons. This is not a functional edge case; it is an implementation gap in authorization boundaries that enables privilege escalation behavior where a “read/limited-edit” user can control order lifecycle states.

Expected Behavior

  • Order, order-transaction, and order-delivery transition endpoints must perform explicit server-side ACL checks.
  • Requests should be rejected unless the caller has the proper entity update privileges, such as order:update, order_transaction:update, or order_delivery:update.
  • If an account gets 403 on the normal order update API, transition actions on the same protected resource should also be blocked by equivalent policy.
  • Even if transition internals use SYSTEM_SCOPE, caller authorization must be validated before entering the transition execution path.

Root Cause

File: src/Core/Checkout/Order/Api/OrderActionController.php

#[Route(
    path: '/api/_action/order/{orderId}/state/{transition}',
    name: 'api.action.order.state_machine.order.transition_state',
    methods: [Request::METHOD_POST]
)]
public function orderStateTransition(
    string $orderId,
    string $transition,
    Request $request,
    Context $context
): JsonResponse {
    $toPlace = $this->orderService->orderStateTransition(
        $orderId,
        $transition,
        $request->request,
        $context
    );

    return new JsonResponse($toPlace->jsonSerialize());
}

This route exposes state transitions but forwards user-controlled inputs (orderId, transition) into the service layer without PlatformRequest::ATTRIBUTE_ACL and without an explicit context->isAllowed(...) privilege check. An untrusted caller can directly control the transition target.

File: src/Core/Framework/Api/Acl/AclAnnotationValidator.php

$privileges = $request->attributes->get(PlatformRequest::ATTRIBUTE_ACL);

if (!$privileges) {
    return;
}

If route ACL metadata is absent, ACL validation exits immediately. Therefore these action routes skip authorization validation entirely.

File: src/Core/System/StateMachine/StateMachineRegistry.php

public function transition(Transition $transition, Context $context): StateMachineStateCollection
{
    return $context->scope(Context::SYSTEM_SCOPE, function (Context $context) use ($transition): StateMachineStateCollection {
        // ...
        $this->stateMachineHistoryRepository->create([$stateMachineHistoryEntity], $context);
        $repository->upsert($data, $context);
        // ...
    });
}

Transitions run in SYSTEM_SCOPE and persist state/history with system context. This requires strict pre-authorization at the route/controller boundary, but that pre-check is missing, so low-privileged calls still lead to real state changes.

Impact

The precondition is a remotely reachable authenticated low-privileged Admin API user (for example, operator/support account, or a compromised restricted account). The attacker only needs a valid order identifier, then calls transition action endpoints to cancel/reopen/advance order states without intended update privileges. This attack remains feasible even when UI access is restricted, because direct API calls still work. As a result, business workflows can be manipulated: order lifecycle integrity is broken, payment/shipping/document/notification/automation flows can be triggered incorrectly, and operational disruption can follow. In realistic scenarios, an attacker with a restricted account can mass-cancel or selectively alter orders, causing customer-support spikes, settlement inconsistencies, fulfillment mistakes, and practical availability degradation of day-to-day operations.

Patch Recommendation

  • Add explicit ACL requirements to order/order-transaction/order-delivery transition routes in OrderActionController, aligned with entity update privileges.
  • Centralize server-side privilege checks at transition entry points so transition paths and normal update paths follow consistent authorization policy.
  • Keep SYSTEM_SCOPE writes strictly behind authorization gates; ensure caller privilege decisions are completed in pre-check logic before transition execution.
  • Review transition-related APIs to guarantee privilege model mapping (order:*, order_transaction:*, order_delivery:*) is consistently enforced and no unprotected route remains.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
shopware/core
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/core
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18
shopware/platform
>= 6.7.0.0, < 6.7.10.1
6.7.10.1
shopware/platform
< 6.6.10.18
6.6.10.18

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

shopware/core Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/core:^6.7.10.1

shopware/platform Packagist → 6.7.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/platform:^6.7.10.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gq96-5pfx-f4vc
Shopware: SSRF in Media External-Link Endpoint Bypasses IP Validation
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-xvhc-gm7j-mhmc
Shopware: Stored XSS via SVG file upload — no SVG sanitization
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-9v5m-39wh-5chq
Shopware: Unauthorized Payment Trigger for Foreign Orders via /store-api/handle-payment
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-4x3x-869w-xx3m
Shopware SSO referer trust leading to an arbitrary redirect target
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-7w52-7jvm-m9vw
Shopware: Timing-attack on admin panel allowing enumeration of administrator usernames
Low Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-v39m-97p8-gqg7
Shopware: Privilege escalation: non-admin user with user:create ACL can create admin accounts
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-8v9p-g828-v98f
Shopware: Admin Account Takeover via User Recovery Hash Exposure
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-gv8p-48fr-4fxg
Shopware: Privilege Escalation via Sync API Integration Admin Flag Bypass
Medium Also affects shopware/core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor