GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34 CVE-2026-60083
SiYuan: MCP file tool's blocklist is incomplete relative to the HTTP file API it claims to align with, exposing publish-mode passwords and other sensitive workspace files
- Severity
- 6.9 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.39%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.30% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
0.0.0-20260808051406-3542530c505f- Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later
Description
Summary
kernel/mcp/tools/file.go's resolvePath() includes an explicit comment stating its
sensitive-path blocklist is meant to align with the HTTP file API's established blacklist
(refuseToAccess() in kernel/api/file.go), following the remediation for GHSA-cvhv-7xhj-xjp8
("Unauthenticated Administrator takeover exfiltrated via the MCP"), which specifically
recommended restricting this tool's scope. In practice, the MCP tool implements only 1 of the
4 static blocklist entries the HTTP API enforces.
Comparison
kernel/api/file.go refuseToAccess() blocks:
conf/conf.json(API token, cookie signing key, accessAuthCode)data/snippets/conf.json- the entire
data/templatesdirectory data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json- (dynamic, per-request) any path the current publish-mode session isn't authorized for
kernel/mcp/tools/file.go resolvePath() blocks only:
confPath := filepath.Join(util.ConfDir, "conf.json")
if abs == confPath {
return "", fmt.Errorf("access to conf.json is forbidden")
}
Items 2, 3, and 4 are absent. The tool's own list/read/grep/find actions remain fully
functional against them.
Impact
An MCP client with access to the file tool (post-fix for GHSA-cvhv-7xhj-xjp8, i.e. a properly
authenticated Administrator-level caller) can read data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json directly:
type PublishAccessItem struct {
ID string `json:"id"`
Visible bool `json:"visible"`
Password string `json:"password"` // plaintext; empty string = no password
Disable bool `json:"disable"`
}
This exposes the plaintext access password for every publish-mode-shared notebook/document, letting the reader bypass password protection on any publish-mode share. This is a serious sibling issue given the volume of publish-mode access-control bugs already reported against this codebase — the passwords protecting exactly that feature are directly readable through a tool whose own description says "never use for workspace data."
data/templates and data/snippets/conf.json are lower-severity but still inconsistent with
the HTTP API's own precedent for what counts as sensitive.
Why this is a distinct finding, not a duplicate
GHSA-cvhv-7xhj-xjp8 was about reachability an unauthenticated Reader-tier JWT being forwarded
to admin-scoped paths including /mcp. That has been fixed. This report is about the tool's own
scope once reached by a legitimate, properly-authenticated caller, the remediation notes for
that same advisory explicitly called for restricting resolvePath to
WorkspaceDir/temp/siyuan/*.log, which was not implemented; instead the tool retains
workspace-wide scope with only a single-file blocklist addition.
Suggested fix
Either replicate the full refuseToAccess() blocklist in resolvePath() (minimum fix, keeps
parity with the HTTP API going forward by extracting refuseToAccess's path list into a shared
helper both call), or implement the originally-recommended allowlist restricting the tool to
WorkspaceDir/temp/siyuan/*.log for read and disabling write/delete/rename/copy entirely unless
the caller is Administrator, matching the tool's own advertised "debugging/log reading only"
scope.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | < 0.0.0-20260808051406-3542530c505f |
0.0.0-20260808051406-3542530c505f |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260808051406-3542530c505f
- go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260808051406-3542530c505f && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 6.9
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 4.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45 SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4 SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5 SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/* | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8 SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass) | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor