Skip to content

GHSA-c5cp-vx83-jhqx CVE-2026-21445 PYSEC-2026-1524 PYSEC-2026-2571

Langflow Missing Authentication on Critical API Endpoints

Critical PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
33.29%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 98.37% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

Multiple critical API endpoints in Langflow are missing authentication controls, allowing any unauthenticated user to access sensitive user conversation data, transaction histories, and perform destructive operations including message deletion. This affects endpoints handling personal data and system operations that should require proper authorization.

Details

The vulnerability exists in three API endpoints within src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/monitor.py that are missing the required dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)] authentication dependency:

Affected Endpoints:

  1. GET /api/v1/monitor/messages (Line 61)

    @router.get("/messages")  # ❌ Missing authentication
    async def get_messages(
        session: DbSession,
        flow_id: Annotated[UUID | None, Query()] = None,
        session_id: Annotated[str | None, Query()] = None,
        # ... other parameters
    ) -> list[MessageResponse]:
    
  2. GET /api/v1/monitor/transactions (Line 183)

    @router.get("/transactions")  # ❌ Missing authentication
    async def get_transactions(
        flow_id: Annotated[UUID, Query()],
        session: DbSession,
        params: Annotated[Params | None, Depends(custom_params)],
    ) -> Page[TransactionTable]:
    
  3. DELETE /api/v1/monitor/messages/session/{session_id} (Line 165)

    @router.delete("/messages/session/{session_id}", status_code=204)  # ❌ Missing authentication
    async def delete_messages_session(
        session_id: str,
        session: DbSession,
    ):
    

Inconsistency Evidence: Other endpoints in the same file properly implement authentication:

@router.get("/messages/sessions", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])  # ✅ Properly secured
@router.delete("/messages", status_code=204, dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])  # ✅ Properly secured

PoC

Complete reproduction steps to demonstrate the vulnerability:

Prerequisites:

  1. Start a Langflow server instance
  2. Ensure no authentication headers or API keys are provided

Reproduction Commands:

# 1. Access all user conversations without authentication
curl http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages

# 2. Access transaction history without authentication
curl "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/transactions?flow_id=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"

# 3. Delete user messages by session without authentication
curl -X DELETE http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages/session/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000

Expected vs Actual Behavior:

  • Expected: All requests should return 401 Unauthorized
  • Actual: All requests return successful responses with sensitive data or perform destructive operations

Impact

Vulnerability Type: Broken Authentication and Authorization (OWASP Top 10 - A01:2021)

Severity: High

Who is Impacted:

  • All Langflow users: Personal conversation data exposed to unauthorized access
  • System administrators: Transaction logs disclosed

Specific Impacts:

  1. Data Breach: Unauthorized access to user conversations containing potentially sensitive personal information
  2. Privacy Violation: Transaction histories and user activity patterns exposed without consent
  3. Data Destruction: Malicious actors can delete user conversation histories without authorization
  4. Compliance Risk: Potential violations of data protection regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)
  5. System Intelligence: Attackers can gather information about system usage patterns and user behavior

Attack Scenarios:

  • Malicious users accessing proprietary conversation data
  • Malicious users deleting other users' conversation histories
  • Automated scraping of all user conversations for data harvesting
  • Reconnaissance attacks to understand system architecture and usage patterns

Recommended Fix: Add authentication dependencies to all affected endpoints:

@router.get("/messages", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])
@router.get("/transactions", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])
@router.delete("/messages/session/{session_id}", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])

Environment:

  • Langflow Version: Current main branch
  • Affected Components: API v1 monitoring endpoints
  • Authentication System: FastAPI dependency injection with get_current_active_user

<img width="1908" height="1029" alt="25-090901" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44bd03b4-6ada-45b7-b81b-9cb83747172b" />

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
langflow
< 1.7.1
1.7.1
langflow-base
< 0.7.1
0.7.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

langflow PyPI → 1.7.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "langflow>=1.7.1"
poetry
poetry add "langflow>=1.7.1"
uv
uv add "langflow>=1.7.1"

langflow-base PyPI → 0.7.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "langflow-base>=0.7.1"
poetry
poetry add "langflow-base>=0.7.1"
uv
uv add "langflow-base>=0.7.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 9.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's Flow
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-g22f-v6f7-2hrh
Langflow affected by Remote Code Execution via validate_code() exec()
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-577h-p2hh-v4mv
Langflow CORS misconfiguration enables Account Takeover and RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
Langflow Unauth RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-j8f7-x8jm-wmm4
Langflow: SSRF in URL-taking components (protection disabled by default / warn-only, not applied to RSS, SearXNG, Web Search, Home Assistant, Glean, Docling)
Medium Also affects langflow
GHSA-4f6c-2vvp-gw82
Langflow: IP Spoofing Bypass via `X-Forwarded-For` Allowing Remote Configuration Write
High Also affects langflow
GHSA-4hmc-cfm3-w43c
Langflow has Authenticated Cross-Project File Disclosure via Unscoped MCP Resource Handlers
High Also affects langflow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor