Skip to content

GHSA-9wrv-g75h-8ccc CVE-2022-24872

Improper Access Control in Shopware

High Packagist
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.05%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 64.36% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Shopware 6 is an open commerce platform based on Symfony Framework and Vue and supported by a worldwide community and more than 1.500 community extensions. Permissions set to sales channel context by admin-api are still useable within normal user session. We recommend updating to the current version 6.4.10.1. You can get the update to 6.4.10.1 regularly via the Auto-Updater or directly via the download overview. For older versions of 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3, corresponding security measures are also available via a plugin. For the full range of functions, we recommend updating to the latest Shopware version.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
shopware/core
< 6.4.10.1
6.4.10.1
shopware/platform
< 6.4.10.1
6.4.10.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

shopware/core Packagist → 6.4.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/core:^6.4.10.1

shopware/platform Packagist → 6.4.10.1

composer
composer require shopware/platform:^6.4.10.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource

The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: When using a critical resource such as a configuration file, check to see if the resource has insecure permissions (such as being modifiable by any regular user) [REF-62], and generate an error or even exit the software if there is a possibility that the resource could have been modified by an unauthorized party.
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully defining distinct user groups, privileges, and/or roles. Map these against data, functionality, and the related resources. Then set the permissions accordingly. This will allow you to maintain more fine-grained control over your resources. [REF-207]
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Implementation, Installation: During program startup, explicitly set the default permissions or umask to the most restrictive setting possible. Also set the appropriate permissions during program installation. This will prevent you from inheriting insecure permissions from any user who installs or runs the program.
  • System Configuration: For all configuration files, executables, and libraries, make sure that they are only readable and writable by the software's administrator.
  • Documentation: Do not suggest insecure configuration changes in documentation, especially if those configurations can extend to resources and other programs that are outside the scope of the application.
  • Installation: Do not assume that a system administrator will manually change the configuration to the settings that are recommended in the software's manual.
  • Operation, System Configuration: Ensure that the software runs properly under the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) [REF-199] or an equivalent hardening configuration guide, which many organizations use to limit the attack surface and potential risk of deployed software.
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to disable public access.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gq96-5pfx-f4vc
Shopware: SSRF in Media External-Link Endpoint Bypasses IP Validation
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-xvhc-gm7j-mhmc
Shopware: Stored XSS via SVG file upload — no SVG sanitization
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-9v5m-39wh-5chq
Shopware: Unauthorized Payment Trigger for Foreign Orders via /store-api/handle-payment
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-f8q6-3g5w-jjr6
Shopware: Admin API ACL Bypass in Order State Transition Endpoints
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-4x3x-869w-xx3m
Shopware SSO referer trust leading to an arbitrary redirect target
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-7w52-7jvm-m9vw
Shopware: Timing-attack on admin panel allowing enumeration of administrator usernames
Low Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-v39m-97p8-gqg7
Shopware: Privilege escalation: non-admin user with user:create ACL can create admin accounts
Medium Also affects shopware/core
GHSA-8v9p-g828-v98f
Shopware: Admin Account Takeover via User Recovery Hash Exposure
Medium Also affects shopware/core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor