Skip to content

GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q CVE-2026-80202

Kimai has Missing Voter Check that Allows Cross-Team Timesheet Manipulation

High Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.39%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.37% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
2.56.0
Upgrade kimai/kimai to this version or later

Description

Summary

Any ROLE_TEAMLEAD user can enumerate, read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any other user in the system — regardless of team membership. This enables data destruction (deleted billable hours), data tampering (forged timesheet durations), and full authorization bypass on timesheet resources. Verified against Kimai 2.52.0.

Details

TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute() maps permissions to own_timesheet or other_timesheet without checking team membership. The voter's own comment confirms this is a known gap:

// extend me for "team" support later on
if ($subject->getUser()?->getId() === $user->getId()) {
    $permission .= 'own';
} else {
    $permission .= 'other';
}

PoC

Tested against Kimai 2.52.0 Docker instance.

Setup:

  • User A (usera, ROLE_TEAMLEAD) owns timesheet ID 2 with description "Private timesheet - UserA only"
  • User B (userb, ROLE_TEAMLEAD) is NOT on any team with User A

User B reads User A's timesheet data:

GET /api/timesheets/2 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>

Response: HTTP 200 — returns full timesheet record including description "Private timesheet - UserA only".

User B deletes User A's timesheet:

DELETE /api/timesheets/3 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>

Response: HTTP 204 No Content — timesheet permanently deleted.

User B tampers User A's timesheet:

PATCH /api/timesheets/6 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>
Content-Type: application/json

{"begin":"2026-03-24T08:00:00","end":"2026-03-24T18:00:00","project":1,"activity":1,"description":"TAMPERED","exported":false,"billable":false}

Response: HTTP 200 OK — duration inflated from 3600s to 36000s, description overwritten.

Note: ROLE_USER (userc) is correctly blocked — DELETE returns 403 and the actions endpoint returns an empty array. The vulnerability only affects ROLE_TEAMLEAD and above. Timesheet IDs are sequential integers, trivially enumerable.

Impact

Any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD or above can:

  1. Permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide — destroying billable hours, payroll data, and project billing history
  2. Silently alter timesheet descriptions, hours, and billing flags — forging hours up or down, directly affecting invoicing and payroll
  3. Enumerate all timesheet IDs (sequential integers) and access action metadata for arbitrary records

No user interaction required. ROLE_USER accounts are correctly restricted; the vulnerability is specific to ROLE_TEAMLEAD receiving global scope instead of team-scoped access.

Maintainers answer: why this is not eligible for a CVE

The behavior described matches the documented permission model. Per the Kimai documentation, the relevant permissions granted to ROLE_TEAMLEAD are:

  • edit_other_timesheet — Edit existing records of other users
  • delete_other_timesheet — Delete existing records of other users

These permissions were global by design, not team-scoped. The UI surfaces only the teamlead's own team timesheets, but the API has historically honored these permissions as documented: a role holding *_other_timesheet can act on any other user's timesheet. The inline comment // extend me for "team" support later on reflects this accurately — team-scoped enforcement was a planned enhancement, not a security control that existed and failed.

The report frames this as authorization bypass, but no authorization boundary is being crossed: ROLE_TEAMLEAD is operating within its documented permissions.

Kimai acknowledges that this behavior might not be expected, so while it will be treated as a feature request for team-scoped permission enforcement and not a vulnerability, it still track it as having security implications.

Solution

Team-scoped timesheet permission checks were added in 2.56.0.

Operators of Kimai <= 2.55 who need stricter isolation between teamleads should not grant ROLE_TEAMLEAD to users who must not act on other teams' timesheets.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
kimai/kimai
< 2.56.0
2.56.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

kimai/kimai Packagist → 2.56.0

composer
composer require kimai/kimai:^2.56.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rw46-qg69-vg6h
Kimai: ExportTemplate CRUD Missing Authorization Check Allows Unauthorized TEAMLEAD Access
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-v8hx-4vx8-wc96
Kimai: Pre-2FA KIMAI_SESSION cookie grants full authenticated REST API access, bypassing TOTP
High Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-2xgg-2x8h-8xw4
Kimai: Improper Authorization in Project, Customer, and Activity Rate Edit Endpoints Allows Cross-Scope Rate Manipulation
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-xv4r-4885-gwpg
Kimai has Improper Authorization in Team Member and Team Activity Assignment APIs Which Allows Expansion of Team Scope Beyond Authorized Visibility
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-jr9p-4h4j-6c58
Kimai: Default APP_SECRET in Docker Image Enables Cookie Forgery and Account Takeover
Critical Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-r8vr-m544-qh4h
Kimai: Login CSRF in the Timesheet Stop and Restart API Endpoints Allows Unauthorized State Changes
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh
Improper Authorization in Kimai Timesheet Restart and Duplicate Allows New Timesheets After Project Access Revocation
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
GHSA-3q6q-26vg-v97x
Kimai: Improper Authorization Through Activity Creation with Preset Project Allows Creation Under Unauthorized Projects
Medium Also affects kimai/kimai
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor