GHSA-7m72-mh5r-6j3r CVE-2022-43759
Privilege escalation in project role template binding (PRTB) and -promoted roles
- Severity
- 7.2 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.68%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 52.28% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
2.5.17- Upgrade github.com/rancher/rancher to this version or later
Description
Impact
An issue was discovered in Rancher versions from 2.5.0 up to and including 2.5.16 and from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.9, where an authorization logic flaw allows privilege escalation via project role template binding (PRTB) and -promoted roles. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.7 releases.
Note: Consult Rancher documentation for more information about cluster and project roles and KB 000020097 for information about -promoted roles.
This privilege escalation is possible for users with access to the escalate verb on PRTBs (projectroletemplatebindings.management.cattle.io), including users with * verbs on PRTBs (see notes below for more information). These users can escalate permissions for any -promoted resource (see the table below for a full enumeration) in any cluster where they have a PRTB granting such permissions in at least one project in the cluster.
On a default Rancher setup, only the following roles have such permissions:
- Project Owner
- Manage Project Members
These roles have permissions to affect the following resources:
| Resource | API Group | Affected Rancher version |
|---|---|---|
| navlinks | ui.cattle.io | 2.6 |
| nodes | "" | 2.6 |
| persistentvolumes | "" | 2.5, 2.6 |
| persistentvolumes | core | 2.5, 2.6 |
| storageclasses | storage.k8s.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
| apiservices | apiregistration.k8s.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
| clusterrepos | catalog.cattle.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
clusters (local only) |
management.cattle.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
Notes:
- During the calculation of the CVSS score,
privileges requiredwas considered ashighbecause, by default,standard useranduser-baseusers in Rancher do not havecreate,patchandupdatepermissions onroletemplates. - If a role template with access to those objects was already created by another user in the cluster, then this issue can be exploited by users without the mentioned permissions from point 1.
Workarounds
If updating Rancher to a patched version is not possible, then the following workarounds must be observed to mitigate this issue:
- Only grant Project Owner and Manage Project Members roles to trusted users.
- Minimize the creation of custom roles that contain the
escalate,*or write verbs (create,delete,patch,update) onprojectroletemplatebindingsresource, and only grant such custom roles to trusted users. - Minimize the number of users that have permissions to
create,patchandupdateroletemplates.
Patches
Patched versions include releases 2.5.17 and 2.6.10 and later versions. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.7 releases.
Detection
The following script was developed to list role template bindings that give written access to the affected resources listed above. It is highly recommended to run the script in your environment and review the list of identified roles and role template bindings for possible signs of exploitation of this issue. The script requires jq installed and a kubeconfig with access to Rancher local cluster; it can also be executed in Rancher's kubectl shell.
#!/bin/bash
help="
Usage: bash find_promoted_resource.sh \n \n
Requires: \n
- jq installed and on path \n
- A kubeconfig pointing at rancher's local cluster (can also run from rancher's kubectl shell) \n \n
Outputs a list of roletemplates and roletemplate bindings which give write access to promoted resources.
"
if [[ $1 == "-h" || $1 == "--help" ]]
then
echo -e $help
exit 0
fi
# first, get the current roletemplates so that we only issue a get once
kubectl get roletemplates.management.cattle.io -o json >> script_templates.json
# find roles which have write access to a promoted resource. Filter on roleTemplates which fulfill all requirements:
# Have a project context
# Have some rules
# Have one/more of the target api groups, or a * in the api groups
# Have one/more of the target resources, or a * in the resources
# Have a verb that is not read access (i.e. a verb that is not get/list/watch)
roles=$(jq --argjson apiGroups '["", "ui.cattle.io", "core", "storage.k8s.io", "apiregistration.k8s.io", "catalog.cattle.io", "management.cattle.io"]' --argjson resources '["navlinks", "persistentvolumes", "nodes", "storageclasses", "apiservices", "clusterrepos", "clusters"]' --argjson verbs '["get", "list", "watch"]' '.items[] | select(.context=="project" and (.rules | length >= 1)) | select( .rules[] | select( (($apiGroups - .apiGroups | length < 7) or (.apiGroups | index("*"))) and (($resources - .resources | length < 7) or (.resources | index("*"))) and (.verbs - $verbs | length > 0)) | length >= 1 ) | .metadata.name' script_templates.json | jq -s )
# log promoted roles which give direct write access so they can be easily fixed
echo "The following role templates give direct write access to a promoted resource:"
echo $roles
echo -e ""
# find any roles which inherit first-level roles. Mostly a BFS which radiates outward from the known bad roles
old_roles="[]"
new_roles="$roles"
old_length=$(echo $old_roles | jq 'length')
new_length=$(echo $new_roles | jq 'length')
# if our last loop found nothing new, it's safe to stop
while [[ $old_length != $new_length ]];
do
# set old values to what we currently know about
old_roles=$new_roles
old_length=$new_length
# update new values with anything that inherits a "bad" role we know about
new_roles=$(jq --argjson roles "$old_roles" --argjson roleLen "$old_length" '.items[] | .metadata.name as $NAME | select (( $roles | index($NAME)) or ((.roleTemplateNames | length > 0 ) and ($roles - .roleTemplateNames | length < $roleLen))) | .metadata.name ' script_templates.json | jq -s)
new_length=$(echo $new_roles | jq 'length')
done
roles=$new_roles
# log all roles which can give write access, even if it's not first level
echo -e "The following role templates give write access to a promoted resource directly or through inheritance:"
echo $roles
echo -e ""
kubectl get projectroletemplatebindings.management.cattle.io -A -o json >> script_bindings.json
role_template_bindings=$(jq --argjson roleTemplates "$roles" '.items[] | .roleTemplateName as $TemplateName | select($roleTemplates | index($TemplateName)) | .metadata.name' script_bindings.json | jq -s)
# since these bindings could be for users or groups, we need to include all fields which could help identify the subject. But they won't all be present, which makes the list look less pretty
echo -e "The following is a list of bindings which give access to promoted resource, with the format of: bindingName, projectName, userName, userPrincipalName, groupName, groupPrincipalName: "
echo $(jq --argjson bindings "$role_template_bindings" '.items[] | .metadata.name as $BindingName | select ( $bindings | index($BindingName)) | .metadata.name, .projectName, .userName?, .userPrincipalName?, .groupName?, .groupPrincipalName?' script_bindings.json | jq -s)
unset old_roles
unset new_roles
unset roles
unset role_template_bindings
rm script_templates.json
rm script_bindings.json
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Reach out to SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries.
- Open an issue in Rancher repository.
- Verify our support matrix and product support lifecycle
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/rancher/rancher | >= 2.5.0, < 2.5.17 |
2.5.17 |
| github.com/rancher/rancher | >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.10 |
2.6.10 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/rancher/rancher Go → 2.5.17
- go
go get github.com/rancher/rancher@v2.5.17 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.2
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
- Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-4j6x-2764-m8gh Rancher has over-inclusive team membership expansion in GitHub App authentication provider | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-vx8h-4prv-g744 Rancher has Privilege Escalation from Project Owner to Host | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mhc6-2gfq-xx62 Rancher vulnerable to command injection through unsanitized YAML parameter | Critical | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-5v3h-x4wf-5c35 Rancher Extensions have arbitrary file access via path traversal | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-gqf8-rvrh-g7w6 Rancher cloud credentials can be used through proxy API by users without access | Critical | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-hwm2-4ph6-w6m5 Rancher's restricted PodSecurityPolicy does not prevent containers from running as a privileged user | High | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mc24-7m59-4q5p Rancher CLI skips TLS verification on Rancher CLI login command | Medium | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
| GHSA-mw39-9qc2-f7mg Rancher exposes sensitive information through audit logs | Medium | Also affects github.com/rancher/rancher |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor