GHSA-6c8g-9hfh-pq5h CVE-2026-46395
HAXcms: Private Key Disclosure via Broken HMAC Implementation
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.29%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.15% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-321 Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
- CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
- Fix
26.0.0- Upgrade @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs to this version or later
Description
Summary
The hmacBase64() function in the HAXcms Node.js backend contains two critical cryptographic implementation errors that together allow any unauthenticated attacker to extract the system’s private signing key and forge arbitrary admin-level JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) allowing them to get full admin access with a single HTTP request.
Details
Bug 1: Hardcoded HMAC Key (line 2160): The function passes the literal string "0" as the HMAC signing key instead of the key parameter, making every HAXcms instance compute identical HMACs for the same input.
Bug 2: Private Key Appended to Output (lines 2161- 2163): After computing the HMAC, the function concatenates the real key parameter which is "this.privateKey + this.salt", the system’s master signing secret is directly onto the output. The combined buffer is base64-encoded and returned as the token.
Every base64url token produced has the same structure: 32 bytes HMAC keyed with "0" and N bytes of privateKey+salt. An attacker base64-decodes any token, discards the first 32 bytes, and reads the private key directly.
The /system/api/connectionSettings endpoint is unauthenticated and returns multiple tokens generated by this function. A single GET request to this endpoint exposes the private key.
The PHP backend (HAXCMS.php:1619-1631) implements this function correctly with the actual key and returns only the hash. The PHP version produces 44-character tokens whereas the broken Node.js version produces 139+ character tokens.
PoC
- GET request to
/system/api/connectionSettingsendpoint and fetch the token. - Extract the private key from the fetched token. The
hmacBase64()function produces 32 bytes with HMAC-SHA256 with hardcoded key "0" and the rest of the bytes areprivateKey+salt(plaintext). Decode the Base64 token, discard the first 32 bytes, read the remaining bytes as UTF-8 (this is your extracted private key). - Since JWT's are signed with
privateKey+salt, use this stolen private key to forge a JWT for admin usingJWT.sign(payload, this.privateKey+this.salt). NOTE: the payload uses {id, user (set this as admin), iat (current timestamp), exp (expiration timestamp)} - The same key can also be used to create other tokens (user_token, base_token, form_token, etc).
- Use these forged tokens to hit all authenticated endpoints (modify/delete/create etc) with admin privileges.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can perform the complete attack chain with a single HTTP request:
- Extract private key: GET "/system/api/connectionSettings", base64-decode any token, discard first 32 bytes.
- Forge admin JWT: sign arbitrary JWT payloads with the stolen privateKey+salt.
- Forge all request tokens: compute valid user_token, site_token for any API call.
- Full admin access: create/modify/delete sites, upload files, modify content.
This works even if the admin has changed the default credentials to a strong password. The forged tokens produce no login events in logs.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs | < 26.0.0 |
26.0.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs npm → 26.0.0
- npm
npm install @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs@26.0.0- yarn
yarn add @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs@26.0.0- pnpm
pnpm add @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs@26.0.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-321: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
The product uses a hard-coded, unchangeable cryptographic key.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Prevention schemes mirror that of hard-coded password storage.
CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192]. Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
- Architecture and Design: Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-g2g8-95qg-v35h HaxCMS has a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) bypass in its saveNode endpoint | High | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-9r33-xhw8-4qqp HAX CMS: Denial of Service using Malicious Import Request | Medium | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-x3x5-7h4h-gwxg HAXcms: Mass Token Exfiltration and Cross-Tenant Hijack | High | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-jh3h-rpxg-fr36 Stored XSS via <iframe> in HAX CMS allows access to sensitive client-side data and account takeover | High | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-2m6p-hm3w-6jm3 HAX CMS: Stored XSS via '<video-player>' component allows arbitrary JavaScript execution and token theft | Medium | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-q862-gcgq-5m6g HAXcms createSite SSRF Enables Arbitrary File Read | High | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-3fm2-xfq7-7778 HAXcms Has Stored XSS Vulnerability that May Lead to Account Takeover | Medium | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
| GHSA-9jr9-8ff3-m894 HAX CMS API Lacks Authorization Checks | High | Also affects @haxtheweb/haxcms-nodejs |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor